Thuli Mthiyane1, Jonny Peter2, Jenny Allen1,3, Cathy Connolly4, Malika Davids5, Roxana Rustomjee1,6, Timothy H Holtz7, Lesibana Malinga1, Keertan Dheda8,9. 1. Tuberculosis Platform, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa. 2. Division of Allergology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. 3. Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality, East Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 4. Biostatistics Department, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa. 5. Centre for Lung Infection and Immunity, Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. 6. Division of AIDS/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Therapeutics Research Program, Tuberculosis Clinical Research Branch, Rockville, MD, USA. 7. Division of Global HIV and TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 8. Centre for Lung Infection and Immunity, Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine and UCT Lung Institute & South African MRC/UCT Centre for the Study of Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. 9. Department of Infection Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Based on current WHO guidelines, hospitalized tuberculosis (TB) and HIV co-infected patients with CD4 count <100 cells/mm3 who are urine lipoarabinomannan (LAM) positive should be initiated on TB treatment. This recommendation is conditional, and data are limited in sputum smear-negative patients from TB endemic countries where the LAM test is largely inaccessible. Other potential benefits of LAM, including reduction in antibiotic usage have, hitherto, not been explored. METHODS: We consecutively enrolled newly-admitted seriously-ill HIV-infected patients (n=187) with suspected TB from three hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. All patients were empirically treated for TB as per the WHO 2007 smear-negative TB algorithm (patients untreated for TB were not recruited). Bio-banked urine, donated prior to anti-TB treatment, was tested for TB-infection using a commercially available LAM-ELISA test. TB sputum and blood cultures were performed. RESULTS: Data from 156 patients containing CD4 count, urine-LAM, sputum and blood culture results were analysed. Mean age was 37 years, median CD4-count was 75 cells/mm3 [interquartile range (IQR), 34-169 cells/mm3], 54/156 (34.6%) were sputum culture-positive, 12/54 (22.2%) blood-culture positive, and 53/156 (34.0%) LAM-positive. Thus, LAM sensitivity was 55.6% (30/54). The study design did not allow for calculation of specificity. Urine-LAM positivity was associated with low CD4 count (P=0.002). Ninety-point-six percent (48/53) of LAM-positive patients received antibiotics [15/48 (31.3%), 23/48 (47.9%) and 10/48 (20.8%) received one, two or three different antibiotics respectively], while the duration of antibiotic therapy was more than 5 days in 26 of 46 (56.5%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Urine LAM testing in sputum smear-negative severely-ill hospitalized patients with TB-HIV co-infection and advanced immunosuppression, offered an immediate rule-in diagnosis in one-third of empirically treated patients. Moreover, LAM, by providing a rapid alternative diagnosis, could potentially reduce antibiotic overusage in such patients thereby reducing health-care costs and facilitating antibiotic stewardship.
BACKGROUND: Based on current WHO guidelines, hospitalized tuberculosis (TB) and HIV co-infected patients with CD4 count <100 cells/mm3 who are urine lipoarabinomannan (LAM) positive should be initiated on TB treatment. This recommendation is conditional, and data are limited in sputum smear-negative patients from TB endemic countries where the LAM test is largely inaccessible. Other potential benefits of LAM, including reduction in antibiotic usage have, hitherto, not been explored. METHODS: We consecutively enrolled newly-admitted seriously-ill HIV-infected patients (n=187) with suspected TB from three hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. All patients were empirically treated for TB as per the WHO 2007 smear-negative TB algorithm (patients untreated for TB were not recruited). Bio-banked urine, donated prior to anti-TB treatment, was tested for TB-infection using a commercially available LAM-ELISA test. TB sputum and blood cultures were performed. RESULTS: Data from 156 patients containing CD4 count, urine-LAM, sputum and blood culture results were analysed. Mean age was 37 years, median CD4-count was 75 cells/mm3 [interquartile range (IQR), 34-169 cells/mm3], 54/156 (34.6%) were sputum culture-positive, 12/54 (22.2%) blood-culture positive, and 53/156 (34.0%) LAM-positive. Thus, LAM sensitivity was 55.6% (30/54). The study design did not allow for calculation of specificity. Urine-LAM positivity was associated with low CD4 count (P=0.002). Ninety-point-six percent (48/53) of LAM-positive patients received antibiotics [15/48 (31.3%), 23/48 (47.9%) and 10/48 (20.8%) received one, two or three different antibiotics respectively], while the duration of antibiotic therapy was more than 5 days in 26 of 46 (56.5%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Urine LAM testing in sputum smear-negative severely-ill hospitalized patients with TB-HIV co-infection and advanced immunosuppression, offered an immediate rule-in diagnosis in one-third of empirically treated patients. Moreover, LAM, by providing a rapid alternative diagnosis, could potentially reduce antibiotic overusage in such patients thereby reducing health-care costs and facilitating antibiotic stewardship.
Authors: B Hamasur; J Bruchfeld; M Haile; A Pawlowski; B Bjorvatn; G Källenius; S B Svenson Journal: J Microbiol Methods Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 2.363
Authors: Daniel Vargas; Luis García; Robert H Gilman; Carlton Evans; Eduardo Ticona; Marcos Navincopa; Robert F Luo; Luz Caviedes; Clemens Hong; Rod Escombe; David A J Moore Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jan 8-14 Impact factor: 79.321