Literature DB >> 14667349

Natural image statistics mediate brightness 'filling in'.

Steven C Dakin1, Peter J Bex.   

Abstract

Although the human visual system can accurately estimate the reflectance (or lightness) of surfaces under enormous variations in illumination, two equiluminant grey regions can be induced to appear quite different simply by placing a light-dark luminance transition between them. This illusion, the Craik-Cornsweet-O'Brien (CCOB) effect, has been taken as evidence for a low-level 'filling-in' mechanism subserving lightness perception. Here, we present evidence that the mechanism responsible for the CCOB effect operates not via propagation of a neural signal across space but by amplification of the low spatial frequency (SF) structure of the image. We develop a simple computational model that relies on the statistics of natural scenes actively to reconstruct the image that is most likely to have caused an observed series of responses across SF channels. This principle is tested psychophysically by deriving classification images (CIs) for subjects' discrimination of the contrast polarity of CCOB stimuli masked with noise. CIs resemble 'filled-in' stimuli; i.e. observers rely on portions of the stimuli that contain no information per se but that correspond closely to the reported perceptual completion. As predicted by the model, the filling-in process is contingent on the presence of appropriate low SF structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14667349      PMCID: PMC1691518          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  29 in total

1.  An empirical explanation of the cornsweet effect.

Authors:  D Purves; A Shimpi; R B Lotto
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A multiscale spatial filtering account of the White effect, simultaneous brightness contrast and grating induction.

Authors:  B Blakeslee; M E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Darkness filling-in: a neural model of darkness induction.

Authors:  M E Rudd; K F Arrington
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Dynamics of spatial frequency tuning in macaque V1.

Authors:  C E Bredfeldt; D L Ringach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A multiscale spatial filtering account of the Wertheimer-Benary effect and the corrugated Mondrian.

Authors:  B Blakeslee; M E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Contrast-dependent changes in spatial frequency tuning of macaque V1 neurons: effects of a changing receptive field size.

Authors:  Michael P Sceniak; Michael J Hawken; Robert Shapley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Simultaneous contrast, filling-in process and information processing in man's visual system.

Authors:  H J Gerrits; A J Vendrik
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1970-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Lightness and retinex theory.

Authors:  E H Land; J J McCann
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1971-01

9.  Human brightness perception near sharp contours.

Authors:  M Davidson; J A Whiteside
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1971-04

10.  The missing fundamental illusion: variation of spatio-temporal characteristics with dark adaptation.

Authors:  G D Sullivan; M A Georgeson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  28 in total

1.  Noise masking of White's illusion exposes the weakness of current spatial filtering models of lightness perception.

Authors:  Torsten Betz; Robert Shapley; Felix A Wichmann; Marianne Maertens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Dynamic properties of orientation discrimination assessed by using classification images.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dynamic brightness induction causes flicker adaptation, but only along the edges: evidence against the neural filling-in of brightness.

Authors:  Alan E Robinson; Virginia R de Sa
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Perceived contrast in complex images.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Spatiotemporal analysis of brightness induction.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Mechanisms underlying simultaneous brightness contrast: Early and innate.

Authors:  Pawan Sinha; Sarah Crucilla; Tapan Gandhi; Dylan Rose; Amy Singh; Suma Ganesh; Umang Mathur; Peter Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Discriminating natural image statistics from neuronal population codes.

Authors:  Satohiro Tajima; Masato Okada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Forms of prediction in the nervous system.

Authors:  Christoph Teufel; Paul C Fletcher
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  The aperture problem in contoured stimuli.

Authors:  David Kane; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Visual features underlying perceived brightness as revealed by classification images.

Authors:  Ilmari Kurki; Tarja Peromaa; Aapo Hyvärinen; Jussi Saarinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.