Literature DB >> 17401087

Prognostic value of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET and MRI in low-grade glioma.

Frank W Floeth1, Dirk Pauleit, Michael Sabel, Gabriele Stoffels, Guido Reifenberger, Markus J Riemenschneider, Paul Jansen, Heinz H Coenen, Hans-Jakob Steiger, Karl-Josef Langen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In glioma of World Health Organization (WHO) grade II (low-grade glioma), the natural course of a particular patient is not predictable and the treatment strategy is controversial. We determined prognostic factors in adult patients with untreated, nonenhancing, supratentorial low-grade glioma with special regard to PET using the amino acid O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) and MRI.
METHODS: In a prospective study, baseline (18)F-FET PET and MRI analyses were performed on 33 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed low-grade glioma. None of the patients had radiation or chemotherapy. Clinical, histologic, therapeutic (initial cytoreduction vs. biopsy), (18)F-FET uptake, and MRI morphologic parameters were analyzed for their prognostic significance. Statistical endpoints were clinical or radiologic tumor progression, malignant transformation to glioma of WHO grade III or IV (high-grade glioma), and death.
RESULTS: Baseline (18)F-FET uptake and a diffuse versus circumscribed tumor pattern on MRI were highly significant predictors of prognosis (P < 0.01). By the combination of these prognostically significant variables, 3 major prognostic subgroups of low-grade glioma patients could be identified. The first of these subgroups was patients with circumscribed low-grade glioma on MRI without (18)F-FET uptake (n = 11 patients, progression in 18%, no malignant transformation and no death). The second subgroup was patients with circumscribed low-grade glioma with (18)F-FET uptake (n = 13 patients, progression in 46%, malignant transformation to a high-grade glioma in 15%, and death in 8%). The third subgroup was patients with diffuse low-grade glioma with (18)F-FET uptake (n = 9 patients, progression in 100%, malignant transformation to a high-grade glioma in 78%, and death in 56%).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that baseline amino acid uptake on (18)F-FET PET and a diffuse versus circumscribed tumor pattern on MRI are strong predictors for the outcome of patients with low-grade glioma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17401087     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.106.037895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  49 in total

1.  Independent prognostic value of pre-treatment 18-FDG-PET in high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Cécile Colavolpe; Philippe Metellus; Julien Mancini; Maryline Barrie; Céline Béquet-Boucard; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Olivier Mundler; Olivier Chinot; Eric Guedj
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  MRI-suspected low-grade glioma: is there a need to perform dynamic FET PET?

Authors:  Nathalie L Jansen; Vera Graute; Lena Armbruster; Bogdana Suchorska; Juergen Lutz; Sabina Eigenbrod; Paul Cumming; Peter Bartenstein; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Friedrich Wilhelm Kreth; Christian la Fougère
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Comparison of F-18 FET-PET with F-18 FDG-PET for biopsy planning of non-contrast-enhancing gliomas.

Authors:  Michail Plotkin; C Blechschmidt; G Auf; F Nyuyki; L Geworski; T Denecke; W Brenner; F Stockhammer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Molecular imaging of gliomas with PET: opportunities and limitations.

Authors:  Christian la Fougère; Bogdana Suchorska; Peter Bartenstein; Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth; Jörg-Christian Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas.

Authors:  Nathalie L Albert; Michael Weller; Bogdana Suchorska; Norbert Galldiks; Riccardo Soffietti; Michelle M Kim; Christian la Fougère; Whitney Pope; Ian Law; Javier Arbizu; Marc C Chamberlain; Michael Vogelbaum; Ben M Ellingson; Joerg C Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Synthesis, Radiolabeling, and Biological Evaluation of (R)- and (S)-2-Amino-5-[(18)F]fluoro-2-methylpentanoic Acid ((R)-, (S)-[(18)F]FAMPe) as Potential Positron Emission Tomography Tracers for Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Ahlem Bouhlel; Dong Zhou; Aixiao Li; Liya Yuan; Keith M Rich; Jonathan McConathy
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Hypometabolic gliomas on FET-PET-is there an inverted U-curve for survival?

Authors:  David Olayinka Kamson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Influence of Dexamethasone on O-(2-[18F]-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine Uptake in the Human Brain and Quantification of Tumor Uptake.

Authors:  Carina Stegmayr; Gabriele Stoffels; Elena Rota Kops; Philipp Lohmann; Norbert Galldiks; Nadim J Shah; Bernd Neumaier; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Continuous low-dose temozolomide and celecoxib in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Florian Stockhammer; Martin Misch; Arend Koch; Marcus Czabanka; Michail Plotkin; Cristiane Blechschmidt; Jochen Tuettenberg; Peter Vajkoczy
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: diagnosing atypical or malignant meningiomas and detecting tumor dedifferentiation.

Authors:  V A Nagar; J R Ye; W H Ng; Y H Chan; F Hui; C K Lee; C C T Lim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.