Literature DB >> 16839701

Early change in glucose metabolic rate measured using FDG-PET in patients with high-grade glioma predicts response to temozolomide but not temozolomide plus radiotherapy.

Natalie Charnley1, Catharine M West, Carolyn M Barnett, Catherine Brock, Graeme M Bydder, Mark Glaser, Ed S Newlands, Ric Swindell, Julian Matthews, Pat Price.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the ability of positron emission tomography (PET) to predict response to temozolomide vs. temozolomide plus radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nineteen patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) were studied. Patients with recurrent glioma received temozolomide 75 mg/m2 daily for 7 weeks (n=8). Newly diagnosed patients received temozolomide 75 mg/m2 daily plus radiotherapy 60 Gy/30 fractions over 6 weeks, followed by six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide 200 mg/m2/day (Days 1-5 q28) starting 1 month after radiotherapy (n=11). [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) PET scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed at baseline, and 7 and 19 weeks after initiation of temozolomide administration. Changes in glucose metabolic rate (MRGlu) and MRI response were correlated with patient survival.
RESULTS: In the temozolomide-alone group, patients who survived>26 vs. <or=26 weeks showed a greater reduction in MRGlu measured at 7 weeks with median changes of -34% and -4%, respectively (p=0.02). PET responders, defined as a reduction in MRGlu>or=25%, survived longer than nonresponders with mean survival times of 75 weeks (95% CI, 34-115 vs. 20 weeks (95% CI, 14-26) (p=0.0067). In the small group of patients studied, there was no relationship between MRI response and survival (p=0.52). For patients receiving temozolomide plus radiotherapy, there was no difference in survival between PET responders and nonresponders (p=0.32).
CONCLUSIONS: Early changes in MRGlu predict response to temozolomide, but not temozolomide plus radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16839701     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  15 in total

Review 1.  Molecular imaging of gliomas with PET: opportunities and limitations.

Authors:  Christian la Fougère; Bogdana Suchorska; Peter Bartenstein; Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth; Jörg-Christian Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas.

Authors:  Nathalie L Albert; Michael Weller; Bogdana Suchorska; Norbert Galldiks; Riccardo Soffietti; Michelle M Kim; Christian la Fougère; Whitney Pope; Ian Law; Javier Arbizu; Marc C Chamberlain; Michael Vogelbaum; Ben M Ellingson; Joerg C Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  FDG-PET predicts survival in recurrent high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan.

Authors:  Cécile Colavolpe; Olivier Chinot; Philippe Metellus; Julien Mancini; Maryline Barrie; Céline Bequet-Boucard; Emeline Tabouret; Olivier Mundler; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Eric Guedj
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  Specific biomarkers of receptors, pathways of inhibition and targeted therapies: clinical applications.

Authors:  Y Waerzeggers; R T Ullrich; P Monfared; T Viel; M Weckesser; W Stummer; O Schober; A Winkeler; A H Jacobs
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Re-irradiation in recurrent malignant glioma: prognostic value of [18F]FET-PET.

Authors:  Maximilian Niyazi; Nathalie Jansen; Ute Ganswindt; Silke Birgit Schwarz; Julia Geisler; Oliver Schnell; Karen Büsing; Sabina Eigenbrod; Christian la Fougère; Claus Belka
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  Brain tumors.

Authors:  Karl Herholz; Karl-Josef Langen; Christiaan Schiepers; James M Mountz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 7.  Targeted molecular imaging in oncology: focus on radiation therapy.

Authors:  Sridhar Nimmagadda; Eric C Ford; John W Wong; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 8.  Performance of 18F-FET versus 18F-FDG-PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vincent Dunet; Anastasia Pomoni; Andreas Hottinger; Marie Nicod-Lalonde; John O Prior
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Adam D Waldman; Alan Jackson; Stephen J Price; Christopher A Clark; Thomas C Booth; Dorothee P Auer; Paul S Tofts; David J Collins; Martin O Leach; Jeremy H Rees
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Constantin Lapa; Ursula Nestle; Nathalie L Albert; Christian Baues; Ambros Beer; Andreas Buck; Volker Budach; Rebecca Bütof; Stephanie E Combs; Thorsten Derlin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Christian Furth; Cihan Gani; Eleni Gkika; Anca-L Grosu; Christoph Henkenberens; Harun Ilhan; Steffen Löck; Simone Marnitz-Schulze; Matthias Miederer; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Maximilian Niyazi; Christoph Pöttgen; Claus M Rödel; Imke Schatka; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Andrei S Todica; Wolfgang Weber; Simone Wegen; Thomas Wiegel; Constantinos Zamboglou; Daniel Zips; Klaus Zöphel; Sebastian Zschaeck; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.