Literature DB >> 21756665

Acoustic change complex in cochlear implant subjects in comparison with psychoacoustic measures.

Ulrich Hoppe1, Torsten Wohlberedt, Galina Danilkina, Horst Hessel.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21756665     DOI: 10.1179/146701010X12671177204101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Peripheral and Central Contributions to Cortical Responses in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Brain Responses to Surprising Stimulus Offsets: Phenomenology and Functional Significance.

Authors:  R Somervail; R J Bufacchi; C Salvatori; L Neary-Zajiczek; Y Guo; G Novembre; G D Iannetti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.861

5.  Intracorporeal Cortical Telemetry as a Step to Automatic Closed-Loop EEG-Based CI Fitting: A Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Andy J Beynon; Bart M Luijten; Emmanuel A M Mylanus
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2021-12-13

6.  Waves of Change: Brain Sensitivity to Differential, not Absolute, Stimulus Intensity is Conserved Across Humans and Rats.

Authors:  R Somervail; F Zhang; G Novembre; R J Bufacchi; Y Guo; M Crepaldi; L Hu; G D Iannetti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.