Literature DB >> 21756567

Efficacy of cranial electrotherapy stimulation for neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury: a multi-site randomized controlled trial with a secondary 6-month open-label phase.

Gabriel Tan1, Diana H Rintala, Mark P Jensen, J Scott Richards, Sally Ann Holmes, Rama Parachuri, Shamsi Lashgari-Saegh, Larry R Price.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a significant problem for many individuals following spinal cord injury (SCI). Unfortunately, SCI-related neuropathic pain has proven to be largely refractory to analgesic medications and other available treatments. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) has been effective in managing some types of pain. It involves the application of a small amount of current through the head via ear clip electrodes.
OBJECTIVE: Explore the effectiveness of CES for neuropathic pain in persons with SCI and chronic pain. STUDY
DESIGN: Multi-site, double-blind, sham-controlled study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with SCI and chronic neuropathic pain at or below the level of injury were randomized to receive active or sham CES. INTERVENTION: Application of active CES or sham CES 1 hour daily for 21 days. Six-month open-label phase to assess 'as-needed' CES use. OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in pre- to post-session pain ratings as well as change in pain intensity, pain interference, pain quality, pain beliefs and coping strategies, general physical and mental health status, depressive symptomatology, perceived stress, and anxiety pre- to post-treatment.
RESULTS: The active group reported a significantly greater average decrease in pain during daily treatments than the sham group (Kruskal-Wallis chi-square = 4.70, P < 0.05). During the 21-day trial, there was a significant group × time interaction for only one outcome variable; the active group showed larger pre- to post-treatment decreases in pain interference than the sham group did (F = 8.50, P < 0.01, d = 0.59).
CONCLUSIONS: On average, CES appears to have provided a small but statistically significant improvement in pain intensity and pain interference with few troublesome side effects. Individual results varied from no pain relief to a great deal of relief.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21756567      PMCID: PMC3127367          DOI: 10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med        ISSN: 1079-0268            Impact factor:   1.985


  26 in total

1.  The use of cranial electrotherapy stimulation in the management of chronic pain: A review.

Authors:  Daniel L. Kirsch; Ray B. Smith
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.138

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Pain following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  P J Siddall; J D Loeser
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

5.  Chronic pain associated with spinal cord injuries: a community survey.

Authors:  J A Turner; D D Cardenas; C A Warms; C B McClellan
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Pain in cerebral palsy: the relation of coping strategies to adjustment.

Authors:  J M Engel; L Schwartz; M P Jensen; D R Johnson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale).

Authors:  E M Andresen; J A Malmgren; W B Carter; D L Patrick
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  One- and two-item measures of pain beliefs and coping strategies.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Francis J Keefe; John C Lefebvre; Joan M Romano; Judith A Turner
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Chronic pain in a community-based sample of men with spinal cord injury: prevalence, severity, and relationship with impairment, disability, handicap, and subjective well-being.

Authors:  D H Rintala; P G Loubser; J Castro; K A Hart; M J Fuhrer
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Dorsal raphe and external electrical stimulation modulate noxious input to single neurons in nucleus parafascicularis thalami.

Authors:  J T Qiao; M Skolnick; N Dafny
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.077

View more
  9 in total

1.  Feasibility and efficacy of remotely supervised cranial electrical stimulation for pain in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Hyochol Ahn; Kelli Galle; Kenneth B Mathis; Hongyu Miao; Samuel Montero-Hernandez; Natalie Jackson; Hsiao-Hui Ju; Heather McCrackin; Catherine Goodwin; Allison Hargraves; Bhawna Jain; Helen Dinh; Sarah Abdul-Mooti; Lindsey Park; Luca Pollonini
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 2.  Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a review.

Authors:  Raffaele Nardone; Yvonne Höller; Stefan Leis; Peter Höller; Natasha Thon; Aljoscha Thomschewski; Stefan Golaszewski; Francesco Brigo; Eugen Trinka
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Moving towards multiple site outcomes in spinal cord injury pain clinical trials: An issue of clustered observations in trial design and analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Richardson; David T Redden
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 4.  Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.

Authors:  Neil E O'Connell; Louise Marston; Sally Spencer; Lorraine H DeSouza; Benedict M Wand
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-13

5.  Management of Neuropathic Pain Associated with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Ellen M Hagen; Tiina Rekand
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2015-03-06

6.  Efficacy and Tolerability of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in the Treatment of Anxiety: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pao-Yuan Ching; Tien-Wei Hsu; Guan-Wei Chen; Chih-Chuan Pan; Che-Sheng Chu; Po-Han Chou
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 5.435

Review 7.  Short Form health surveys and related variants in spinal cord injury research: a systematic review.

Authors:  David G T Whitehurst; Lidia Engel; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Effects of cranial electrotherapy stimulation on resting state brain activity.

Authors:  Jamie D Feusner; Sarah Madsen; Teena D Moody; Cara Bohon; Emily Hembacher; Susan Y Bookheimer; Alexander Bystritsky
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 9.  Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.

Authors:  Neil E O'Connell; Louise Marston; Sally Spencer; Lorraine H DeSouza; Benedict M Wand
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.