Literature DB >> 32402609

Feasibility and efficacy of remotely supervised cranial electrical stimulation for pain in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled pilot study.

Hyochol Ahn1, Kelli Galle2, Kenneth B Mathis3, Hongyu Miao4, Samuel Montero-Hernandez5, Natalie Jackson2, Hsiao-Hui Ju2, Heather McCrackin2, Catherine Goodwin2, Allison Hargraves2, Bhawna Jain2, Helen Dinh2, Sarah Abdul-Mooti2, Lindsey Park2, Luca Pollonini5.   

Abstract

Cranial electrical stimulation (CES) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that has been shown to improve pain. However, few studies have investigated the potential benefits associated with remotely supervised CES in older adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of remotely supervised CES via secure videoconferencing software on clinical pain severity, experimental pain sensitivity, and pain-related cortical response in older adults with knee OA. Thirty participants with symptomatic knee OA pain were randomly assigned to receive 10 daily sessions (60 min each) of remotely supervised CES (n = 15) or sham CES (n = 15) over two weeks. We measured clinical pain severity via a Numeric Rating Scale, experimental pain sensitivity (e.g., heat pain sensitivity, pressure pain sensitivity, and conditioned pain modulation) using quantitative sensory testing, and pain-related cortical response via functional near-infrared spectroscopy imaging. We also measured participant satisfaction with treatment using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Active CES significantly reduced scores on the Numeric Rating Scale and increased heat pain threshold, pressure pain thresholds, and conditioned pain modulation. We also found significant changes in pain-related cortical hemodynamic activity after CES. Participants tolerated CES well without serious adverse effects and were satisfied with the treatment. Our findings demonstrate promising clinical efficacy of remotely supervised CES for older adults with knee OA.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditioned pain modulation; Cranial electrical stimulation; Knee osteoarthritis; Quantitative sensory testing; Quantitative sensory testings

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32402609      PMCID: PMC7308202          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  37 in total

1.  Characteristics of older adults receiving opioids in primary care: treatment duration and outcomes.

Authors:  M Carrington Reid; Charles R Henderson; Maria Papaleontiou; Leslie Amanfo; Yelena Olkhovskaya; Alison A Moore; Sagar S Parikh; Barbara J Turner
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  The dorsolateral prefrontal network is involved in pain perception in knee osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  Takeshi Hiramatsu; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Shinpei Yoshimura; Atsuo Yoshino; Nobuo Adachi; Yasumasa Okamoto; Shigeto Yamawaki; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association.

Authors:  R Altman; E Asch; D Bloch; G Bole; D Borenstein; K Brandt; W Christy; T D Cooke; R Greenwald; M Hochberg
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1986-08

4.  Estimation of optical pathlength through tissue from direct time of flight measurement.

Authors:  D T Delpy; M Cope; P van der Zee; S Arridge; S Wray; J Wyatt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Brain activity for chronic knee osteoarthritis: dissociating evoked pain from spontaneous pain.

Authors:  Elle L Parks; Paul Y Geha; Marwan N Baliki; Jeffrey Katz; Thomas J Schnitzer; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.931

6.  Functional MRI demonstrates pain perception in hand osteoarthritis has features of central pain processing.

Authors:  Nidhi Sofat; Cori Smee; Monika Hermansson; Matthew Howard; Emma H Baker; Franklyn A Howe; Thomas R Barrick
Journal:  J Biomed Graph Comput       Date:  2013-11

Review 7.  Epidemiology of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Tuhina Neogi; Yuqing Zhang
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.670

8.  Osteoarthritis: From Palliation to Prevention: AOA Critical Issues.

Authors:  Constance R Chu; Michael B Millis; Steven A Olson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Thermal and mechanical pain sensitization in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Debora Bevilaqua-Grossi; Marilia Zanin; Camila Benedetti; Lidiane Florencio; Anamaria Oliveira
Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Specificity of hemodynamic brain responses to painful stimuli: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Meryem A Yücel; Christopher M Aasted; Mihayl P Petkov; David Borsook; David A Boas; Lino Becerra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.996

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Adjunctive therapies in addition to land-based exercise therapy for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  Helen P French; J Haxby Abbott; Rose Galvin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-10-17

2.  Safety and Feasibility of Tele-Supervised Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Davide Cappon; Tim den Boer; Caleb Jordan; Wanting Yu; Alexander Lo; Nicole LaGanke; Maria Chiara Biagi; Pawel Skorupinski; Giulio Ruffini; Oscar Morales; Eran Metzger; Bradley Manor; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.750

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.