Literature DB >> 28309783

Protean defence by prey animals.

D A Humphries1,2, P M Driver1,2.   

Abstract

Attention is drawn to the widespread occurrence ofprotean phenomena, in which the appearance and behaviour of prey animals are rendered variable and irregular, as a weapon in the biological arms race between predators and their prey. Protean behaviour is defined as that behaviour which is sufficiently unsystematic to prevent a reactor predicting in detail the position or actions of the actor.Single prey animals frequently flee from a predator in an irregular manner, zigzagging, spinning, looping, or bouncing. Thissingle erratic display occurs widely in the Animal Kingdom, and may also be utilised in everyday movements of potential prey as insurance against possible attack. Examples are given.In a group of prey animals the protean aspect of escape is enhanced by the effect of numbers. In scatter reactions the effect is of multiple choice and of the simultaneous operation of several single erratics. In mobbing displays there are also successive changes in the actors' behavioural role. In protean deterrence the shuffling of individuals within a tightly packed group prevents a predator from singling one out for attack.In many species the confusing effect of changes in movement and behavioural role is enhanced by rapid changes in appearance, particularly colour.It is suggested that those prey individuals which employ escape patterns unfamiliar to the predator will tend to be at a selective advantage. During phylogeny this is likely to lead to intra-specific and inter-specific increase in the number and diversity of escape behaviours. Apostatic polymorphism is seen as a special case of protean variation within populations.There is evidence that protean displays operate by arousing neurological conflict, thereby delaying the predator's reactions and reducing the effectiveness of predatory mechanisms. Also they insure against learned countermeasures by incorporating irregularities as a basic principle. It is stressed that the irregular variability of protean displays is not accidental but has been selected for in phylogeny. A number of poorly understood behavioural aspects of the ecology of predator-prey relationships are thus united in a single theory.

Year:  1970        PMID: 28309783     DOI: 10.1007/BF00815496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  MOTH SOUNDS AND THE INSECT-CATCHING BEHAVIOR OF BATS.

Authors:  D C DUNNING; K D ROEDER
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-01-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The use and misuse of game theory.

Authors:  A RAPOPORT
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1962-12       Impact factor: 2.142

3.  Erratic display as a device against predators.

Authors:  D A Humphries; P M Driver
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Protean displays as inducers of conflict.

Authors:  P M Driver; D A Humphries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Ecological chemistry.

Authors:  L P Brower
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 2.142

6.  Predation by the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.): the influence of hunger and experience.

Authors:  J J Beukema
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.991

7.  Factors governing the changes in strength of a partially inborn response, as shown by the mobbing behaviour of the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs). I. The nature of the response, and an examination of its course.

Authors:  R A HINDE
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1954-05-27
  7 in total
  35 in total

1.  Fish prey change strategy with the direction of a threat.

Authors:  Arjun Nair; Kelsey Changsing; William J Stewart; Matthew J McHenry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A faster escape does not enhance survival in zebrafish larvae.

Authors:  Arjun Nair; Christy Nguyen; Matthew J McHenry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The effects of steady swimming on fish escape performance.

Authors:  Sanam B Anwar; Kelsey Cathcart; Karin Darakananda; Ashley N Gaing; Seo Yim Shin; Xena Vronay; Dania N Wright; David J Ellerby
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Escaping away from and towards a threat: the cockroach's strategy for staying alive.

Authors:  Paolo Domenici; David Booth; Jonathan M Blagburn; Jonathan P Bacon
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009-11

Review 5.  Animal escapology I: theoretical issues and emerging trends in escape trajectories.

Authors:  Paolo Domenici; Jonathan M Blagburn; Jonathan P Bacon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Alarm substance in Gyrinus aeratus (Coleoptera, Gyrinidae).

Authors:  Britt-Inger Henrikson; Jan A E Stenson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Unpredictable movement as an anti-predator strategy.

Authors:  Graham Richardson; Patrick Dickinson; Oliver H P Burman; Thomas W Pike
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Loudness-dependent behavioral responses and habituation to sound by the longfin squid (Doryteuthis pealeii).

Authors:  T Aran Mooney; Julia E Samson; Andrea D Schlunk; Samantha Zacarias
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race.

Authors:  Nickolay I Hristov; William E Conner
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-03-17

10.  Paranoia as a deficit in non-social belief updating.

Authors:  Erin J Reed; Stefan Uddenberg; Praveen Suthaharan; Christoph D Mathys; Jane R Taylor; Stephanie Mary Groman; Philip R Corlett
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.