Literature DB >> 21750127

Spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis: impact of vertebral hypoplasia on the use of the Meyerding classification.

P Niggemann1, J Kuchta, D Grosskurth, H K Beyer, J Hoeffer, K S Delank.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis are common multifactorial disorders. The extent of slipping of the spondylolytic vertebra is considered a major predicator for prognosis and further follow-up. Vertebral hypoplasia is a common finding associated with spondylolysis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence of hypoplastic vertebral bodies in patients with spondylolysis and in the general population and to analyse the impact of the findings on the measurement and grading of spondylolisthesis.
METHODS: 140 patients with 141 levels of spondylolysis identified by MRI were included in this study. The slippage of the spondylolytic vertebral body and the size in the midline sagittal image were measured and correlated. In addition, a randomised control group was evaluated to test the hypothesis that shortened, hypoplastic vertebral bodies can also be found in the general population.
RESULTS: Shortened, hypoplastic vertebrae were found in 50 patients with spondylolysis and none was found in the control group. These shortened vertebrae mimicked spondylolisthesis and in 19 patients the slippage equalled the shortening, thus mimicking spondylolisthesis, although only spondylolysis was present.
CONCLUSION: Sagittal shortening of the spondylolytic vertebra is common and may mimic spondylolisthesis. In order to define and measure spondylolisthesis the shortening of the spondylolytic vertebra has to be taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21750127      PMCID: PMC3486675          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/60355971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  12 in total

Review 1.  Spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis.

Authors:  Serena S Hu; Clifford B Tribus; Mohammad Diab; Alexander J Ghanayem
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Classification of spondylolisis and spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  L L Wiltse; P H Newman; I Macnab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Pathogenesis of sports-related spondylolisthesis in adolescents. Radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  T Ikata; R Miyake; S Katoh; T Morita; M Murase
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  MR imaging of lumbar spondylolysis: the importance of ancillary observations.

Authors:  J L Ulmer; V P Mathews; A D Elster; L P Mark; D L Daniels; W Mueller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Distinction between degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis on sagittal MR images: importance of increased anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal ("wide canal sign").

Authors:  J L Ulmer; A D Elster; V P Mathews; J C King
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  B E Fredrickson; D Baker; W J McHolick; H A Yuan; J P Lubicky
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Hypoplasia of the lumbar vertebral body simulating spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  D F Frank; J E Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Hypoplasia of L5 and wedging and pseudospondylolisthesis in patients with spondylolysis: study with MR imaging.

Authors:  G Wilms; B Maldague; P Parizel; L Meylaerts; D Vanneste; J Peluso
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Family study of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  M Albanese; P D Pizzutillo
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: 45-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  William J Beutler; Bruce E Fredrickson; Albert Murtland; Colleen A Sweeney; William D Grant; Daniel Baker
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Effects of shear force on intervertebral disc: an in vivo rabbit study.

Authors:  Dong-Dong Xia; Sheng-Lei Lin; Xiang-Yang Wang; Yong-Li Wang; Hong-Ming Xu; Feng Zhou; Jun Tan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Correlation of listhesis on upright radiographs and central lumbar spinal canal stenosis on supine MRI: is it possible to predict lumbar spinal canal stenosis?

Authors:  Tim Finkenstaedt; Filippo Del Grande; Nicolae Bolog; Nils H Ulrich; Sina Tok; Jakob M Burgstaller; Johann Steurer; Christine B Chung; Gustav Andreisek; Sebastian Winklhofer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Clinical Evaluation of Paraspinal Mini-Tubular Lumbar Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Grade I with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Zeyan Liang; Xiongjie Xu; Jian Rao; Yan Chen; Rui Wang; Chunmei Chen
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-10

4.  New physical examination tests for lumbar spondylolisthesis and instability: low midline sill sign and interspinous gap change during lumbar flexion-extension motion.

Authors:  Kang Ahn; Hyung-Joon Jhun
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews.

Authors:  Tom Petersen; Mark Laslett; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Incidence of Revision Surgery After Decompression With vs Without Fusion Among Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Nils H Ulrich; Jakob M Burgstaller; Fabio Valeri; Giuseppe Pichierri; Michael Betz; Tamas F Fekete; Maria M Wertli; François Porchet; Johann Steurer; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01

7.  Comparison of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Peng Peng; Kangwu Chen; Hao Chen; Kai Zhang; Jiajia Sun; Peng Yang; Feng Zhou; Yu Liu; Huilin Yang; Haiqing Mao
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  SIZE study: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of an interarcuair decompression versus extended decompression in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jamie Arjun Sharma; Pravesh S Gadjradj; Wilco C Peul; Maurits W van Tulder; Wouter A Moojen; Biswadjiet S Harhangi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Local Bone Graft Alone for Single-Level Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Ahmed Sleem; Ashraf Marzouk
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.