BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The association between L5 hypoplasia and bilateral spondylolysis was described earlier on conventional radiographs of the lumbar spine. The purpose of this study was to describe the findings on MR imaging in patients with hypoplasia of L5 and to correlate these findings with the presence of bilateral spondylolysis of L5. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied the MR images of 22 patients with hypoplasia and posterior wedging of L5 and with bilateral spondylolysis at L5. The anteroposterior diameter of L4, L5, and S1 were measured and compared. The degree of posterior wedging of L5 was calculated. The degree of anterolisthesis was determined. The intervertebral disks of L4-L5 and L5-S1 were studied. RESULTS: The mean difference between the anteroposterior diameter of L4 and L5 was 3.0 mm, or 8.8% shortening of L5 compared with L4. The mean difference between the anteroposterior diameter of L5 and S1 was 4.4 mm, or 12.3% shortening of L5 compared with S1. The mean percentage posterior wedging was 24.7%. In 13 patients, there was no anterior vertebral slipping. True anterolisthesis grade I was seen in 5 patients and anterolisthesis grade II in 4 patients. Diskarthrosis with disk dehydration of L4-L5 was seen in 20 of the 22 patients. CONCLUSIONS: It is confirmed that hypoplasia of L5 can simulate anterolisthesis. Hypoplasia of the vertebral body of L5 can predict the presence of bilateral spondylolysis.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The association between L5 hypoplasia and bilateral spondylolysis was described earlier on conventional radiographs of the lumbar spine. The purpose of this study was to describe the findings on MR imaging in patients with hypoplasia of L5 and to correlate these findings with the presence of bilateral spondylolysis of L5. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied the MR images of 22 patients with hypoplasia and posterior wedging of L5 and with bilateral spondylolysis at L5. The anteroposterior diameter of L4, L5, and S1 were measured and compared. The degree of posterior wedging of L5 was calculated. The degree of anterolisthesis was determined. The intervertebral disks of L4-L5 and L5-S1 were studied. RESULTS: The mean difference between the anteroposterior diameter of L4 and L5 was 3.0 mm, or 8.8% shortening of L5 compared with L4. The mean difference between the anteroposterior diameter of L5 and S1 was 4.4 mm, or 12.3% shortening of L5 compared with S1. The mean percentage posterior wedging was 24.7%. In 13 patients, there was no anterior vertebral slipping. True anterolisthesis grade I was seen in 5 patients and anterolisthesis grade II in 4 patients. Diskarthrosis with disk dehydration of L4-L5 was seen in 20 of the 22 patients. CONCLUSIONS: It is confirmed that hypoplasia of L5 can simulate anterolisthesis. Hypoplasia of the vertebral body of L5 can predict the presence of bilateral spondylolysis.