Literature DB >> 8037041

Distinction between degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis on sagittal MR images: importance of increased anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal ("wide canal sign").

J L Ulmer1, A D Elster, V P Mathews, J C King.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a visually apparent increase in the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal canal ("wide canal sign") can be used reliably to differentiate degenerative from isthmic spondylolisthesis on midline sagittal MR images. We hypothesized that the wide canal sign would be present only in isthmic spondylolisthesis, where the vertebral ring is disrupted by defects in the pars interarticularis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The midline sagittal MR images of 100 control subjects without spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis were analyzed to establish the normal range of sagittal canal diameters at the various lumbar levels. Midline sagittal MR images of the lumbar spine were reviewed in 53 patients in whom either isthmic (n = 35) or degenerative (n = 18) spondylolisthesis was confirmed with conventional radiography and/or CT. For each spinal level, the sagittal canal ratio, defined as the maximum anteroposterior diameter of the canal at that level divided by the diameter of the canal at L1, was calculated. From our analysis of the control subjects, a normal sagittal canal ratio was determined to be less than 1.25. A sagittal canal ratio of 1.25 or greater at the level of a spondylolisthesis was considered to represent an abnormally increased sagittal canal diameter (wide canal sign), indicating the presence of bilateral pars interarticularis defects. Using this sign alone, two neuroradiologists who had no knowledge of the true diagnosis classified the type of spondylolisthesis in a randomized subgroup of 34 age-matched adults (all more than 40 years old and with grade I isthmic or degenerative spondylolisthesis).
RESULTS: In the 100 subjects without spondylolisthesis and in the 18 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis, the sagittal canal ratio did not exceed 1.25 (mean values, 0.93-0.99) at any level of the lumbar spine. Conversely, the sagittal canal ratio at the level of isthmic spondylolisthesis exceeded 1.25 (mean value, 1.56) in 34 of 35 patients. In patients more than 40 years old, in whom degenerative spondylolisthesis is prevalent and misdiagnosis of isthmic spondylolisthesis is potentially more likely, both neuroradiologists were 100% accurate in correctly assigning the type of spondylolisthesis when using the wide canal sign alone.
CONCLUSION: The wide canal sign on midline sagittal MR images (corresponding to an sagittal canal ratio > or = 1.25) is a reliable predictor of the presence of defects of the pars interarticularis at the level of a spondylolisthesis. This sign could be useful for distinguishing degenerative from isthmic spondylolisthesis when degenerative sclerosis in the pars interarticularis mimics spondylolysis, when direct axial imaging of the pars interarticularis has not been done, or when imaging is technically inadequate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8037041     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.163.2.8037041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

1.  No correlation between patient outcome and abnormal lumbar MRI findings 21 years after posterior or posterolateral fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Ville M Remes; Tommi S Lamberg; Pekka O Tervahartiala; Ilkka J Helenius; Kalevi Osterman; Dietrich Schlenzka; Timo Yrjönen; Seppo Seitsalo; Mikko S Poussa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis: impact of vertebral hypoplasia on the use of the Meyerding classification.

Authors:  P Niggemann; J Kuchta; D Grosskurth; H K Beyer; J Hoeffer; K S Delank
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Imaging of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  P R Hession; W P Butt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Lumbar spondylolysis: a review.

Authors:  Antonio Leone; Alessandro Cianfoni; Alfonso Cerase; Nicola Magarelli; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  L5 pedicle length is increased in subjects with spondylolysis: an anatomic study of 1072 cadavers.

Authors:  Navkirat S Bajwa; Jason O Toy; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  CT volumetry of lumbar vertebral bodies in patients with hypoplasia L5 and bilateral spondylolysis and in normal controls.

Authors:  Guido E Wilms; Endry Willems; Philippe Demaerel; Frederik De Keyzer
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Disc space-targeted angled axial MR images of the lumbar spine: a potential source of diagnostic error.

Authors:  Kush Singh; Clyde A Helms; David Fiorella; Nancy A Major
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Effects and Safety of Lumbar Fusion Techniques in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yi-No Kang; Yu-Wan Ho; William Chu; Wen-Shiang Chou; Shih-Hao Cheng
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-03-23

9.  Increased sagittal diameter of the vertebral arch aids in diagnosis of lumbar spondylolysis.

Authors:  Shi-Zheng Chen; An-Ni Tong; He-Hu Tang; Zhen Lv; Shu-Jia Liu; Jie-Sheng Liu; Jun-Wei Zhang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.