Literature DB >> 21749214

Willingness to pay for genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease: a measure of personal utility.

Ilona M Kopits1, Clara Chen, J Scott Roberts, Wendy Uhlmann, Robert C Green.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The increased availability of genetic tests for common, complex diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), raises questions about what people are willing to pay for these services.
METHODS: We studied willingness-to-pay for genetic testing in a study of AD risk assessment that included APOE genotype disclosure among 276 first-degree relatives of persons with AD.
RESULTS: Seventy-one percent reported that they would ask for such testing from their doctor if it were covered by health insurance, and 60% would ask for it even if it required self-pay. Forty-one percent were willing to pay more than $100 for testing, and more than half would have been willing to pay for the test out of pocket. Participants who learned that they were APOE ε4 positive and those who had higher education were less likely to want testing if covered by insurance, possibly to avoid discrimination.
CONCLUSION: This is the first report to examine willingness to pay for susceptibility genetic testing in a sample of participants who had actually undergone such testing. These findings reveal that some participants find valuable personal utility in genetic risk information even when such information does not have proven clinical utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21749214      PMCID: PMC3241735          DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2011.0028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers        ISSN: 1945-0257


  15 in total

1.  Evidence of range bias in contingent valuation payment scales.

Authors:  David K Whynes; Jane L Wolstenholme; Emma Frew
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Comparing willingness-to-pay: bidding game format versus open-ended and payment scale formats.

Authors:  Emma J Frew; Jane L Wolstenholme; David K Whynes
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Willingness-to-pay for predictive tests with no immediate treatment implications: a survey of US residents.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Joshua T Cohen; James K Hammitt; Thomas W Concannon; Hannah R Auerbach; Chihui Fang; David M Kent
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Benefit evaluation of mass screening for prostate cancer: willingness-to-pay measurement using contingent valuation.

Authors:  Hideo Yasunaga; Hiroo Ide; Tomoaki Imamura; Kazuhiko Ohe
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease and its impact on insurance purchasing behavior.

Authors:  Cathleen D Zick; Charles J Mathews; J Scott Roberts; Robert Cook-Deegan; Robert J Pokorski; Robert C Green
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts; L Adrienne Cupples; Norman R Relkin; Peter J Whitehouse; Tamsen Brown; Susan LaRusse Eckert; Melissa Butson; A Dessa Sadovnick; Kimberly A Quaid; Clara Chen; Robert Cook-Deegan; Lindsay A Farrer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Assessment of demand for prenatal diagnostic testing using willingness to pay.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey; A Eugene Washington; Virginia Gildengorin; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Health behavior changes after genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer disease: The REVEAL Study.

Authors:  Serena Chao; J Scott Roberts; Theresa M Marteau; Rebecca Silliman; L Adrienne Cupples; Robert C Green
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

9.  Reasons for seeking genetic susceptibility testing among first-degree relatives of people with Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Susan A LaRusse; Heather Katzen; Peter J Whitehouse; Melissa Barber; Stephen G Post; Norman Relkin; Kimberly Quaid; Robert H Pietrzak; L Adrienne Cupples; Lindsay A Farrer; Tamsen Brown; Robert C Green
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.703

10.  Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis. APOE and Alzheimer Disease Meta Analysis Consortium.

Authors:  L A Farrer; L A Cupples; J L Haines; B Hyman; W A Kukull; R Mayeux; R H Myers; M A Pericak-Vance; N Risch; C M van Duijn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Oct 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  27 in total

1.  Timing and context: important considerations in the return of genetic results to research participants.

Authors:  Kate A McBride; Nina Hallowell; Martin H N Tattersall; Judy Kirk; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Gillian Mitchell; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-05-26

2.  Clinical implications of APOE genotyping for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) risk estimation: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Victoria S Marshe; Ilona Gorbovskaya; Sarah Kanji; Maxine Kish; Daniel J Müller
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  The perspective from EASAC and FEAM on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes.

Authors:  Robin Fears; Volker ter Meulen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Emerging issues in public health genomics.

Authors:  Dana Dolinoy; Beth Tarini; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 8.929

5.  Genesurance Counseling: Genetic Counselors' Roles and Responsibilities in Regards to Genetic Insurance and Financial Topics.

Authors:  Shelby Brown; Susan Puumala; Jennifer Leonhard; Megan Bell; Jason Flanagan; Lori Williamson Dean; Quinn Stein
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Patients' perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing for their healthcare: findings from the MedSeq project.

Authors:  Philip J Lupo; Jill O Robinson; Pamela M Diamond; Leila Jamal; Heather E Danysh; Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Jason L Vassy; Kurt D Christensen; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Assessing feasibility of delivering pharmacogenetic testing in a community pharmacy setting.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Jivan Moaddeb; Rachel Mills; Deepak Voora
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.533

8.  Was it worth it? Patients' perspectives on the perceived value of genomic-based individualized medicine.

Authors:  Colin Me Halverson; Kristin E Clift; Jennifer B McCormick
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-02-09

Review 9.  Genetic susceptibility testing for neurodegenerative diseases: ethical and practice issues.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Wendy R Uhlmann
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Public perceptions of presymptomatic testing for Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Richard J Caselli; Jessica Langbaum; Gary E Marchant; Rachel A Lindor; Katherine S Hunt; Bruce R Henslin; Amylou C Dueck; Jason S Robert
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.