Literature DB >> 21748420

The influence of anxiety on processing capacity for threat detection.

Helen J Richards1, Julie A Hadwin, Valerie Benson, Michael J Wenger, Nick Donnelly.   

Abstract

In the present study, we explored the proposition that an individual's capacity for threat detection is related to his or her trait anxiety. Using a redundant signals paradigm with concurrent measurements of reaction times and eye movements, participants indicated the presence or absence of an emotional target face (angry or happy) in displays containing no targets, one target, or two targets. We used estimates of the orderings on the hazard functions of the RT distributions as measures of processing capacity (Townsend & Ashby, 1978; Wenger & Gibson, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 30,708-719, 2004) to assess whether self-reported anxiety and the affective state of the face interacted with the level of perceptual load (i.e., the number of targets). Results indicated that anxiety was associated with fewer eye movements and increased processing capacity to detect multiple (vs. single) threatening faces. The data are consistent with anxiety influencing threat detection via a broadly tuned attentional mechanism (Eysenck, Derakshan, Santos, & Calvo, Emotion, 7,336-353, 2007).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21748420     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0124-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons.

Authors:  Artem V Belopolsky; Laura Zwaan; Jan Theeuwes; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

2.  Express saccades: is there a separate population in humans?

Authors:  M G Wenban-Smith; J M Findlay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  An interactive race model of divided attention.

Authors:  J T Mordkoff; S Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants.

Authors:  Nim Tottenham; James W Tanaka; Andrew C Leon; Thomas McCarry; Marcella Nurse; Todd A Hare; David J Marcus; Alissa Westerlund; B J Casey; Charles Nelson
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  The impact of anxiety on visual attention to central and peripheral events.

Authors:  K L Shapiro; A Lim
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1989

6.  A source of error in attempts to distinguish coactivation from separate activation in the perception of redundant targets.

Authors:  C W Eriksen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-08

7.  Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety.

Authors:  D Watson; R Friend
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1969-08

8.  Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control.

Authors:  Douglas Derryberry; Marjorie A Reed
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2002-05

9.  Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety.

Authors:  K Mogg; B P Bradley
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1998-09
View more
  6 in total

1.  Faster than the speed of rejection: Object identification processes during visual search for multiple targets.

Authors:  Hayward J Godwin; Stephen C Walenchok; Joseph W Houpt; Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Statistical measures for workload capacity analysis.

Authors:  Joseph W Houpt; James T Townsend
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  Why are you looking like that? How the context influences evaluation and processing of human faces.

Authors:  Katharina A Schwarz; Matthias J Wieser; Antje B M Gerdes; Andreas Mühlberger; Paul Pauli
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Body actions change the appearance of facial expressions.

Authors:  Carlo Fantoni; Walter Gerbino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Psychomotor Abilities of Professional Handball Players.

Authors:  Krzysztof Przednowek; Maciej Śliż; Justyna Lenik; Bartosz Dziadek; Stanisław Cieszkowski; Paweł Lenik; Dorota Kopeć; Katarzyna Wardak; Karolina H Przednowek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Electrophysiological evidence for greater attention to threat when cognitive control resources are depleted.

Authors:  Amanda Holmes; Karin Mogg; Jan de Fockert; Maria Kragh Nielsen; Brendan P Bradley
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.526

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.