| Literature DB >> 21745393 |
Zhaobin Xu1, Xiaohua Xu, Mianhua Zhong, Ian P Hotchkiss, Ryan P Lewandowski, James G Wagner, Lori A Bramble, Yifeng Yang, Aixia Wang, Jack R Harkema, Morton Lippmann, Sanjay Rajagopalan, Lung-Chi Chen, Qinghua Sun.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have demonstrated a link between air pollution and metabolic diseases such as type II diabetes. Changes in adipose tissue and its mitochondrial content/function are closely associated with the development of insulin resistance and attendant metabolic complications. We investigated changes in adipose tissue structure and function in brown and white adipose depots in response to chronic ambient air pollutant exposure in a rodent model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21745393 PMCID: PMC3152885 DOI: 10.1186/1743-8977-8-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
Primers used for real-time PCR
| Gene | Forward primer (5' - 3') | Reverse primer (5' - 3') |
|---|---|---|
| GCAGCAAGCACAAAGAGGAGAAG | GCGTCTGGTACTTGGTGTAGGG | |
| GCAGCCTAAGCACCTACCTC | TCCTCCTCGGACTCACTGAT | |
| CTGCCGCTATAGCAAGAGGT | TGGCTTGGGTACTCTGTTGTC | |
| GGCCTCTACGACTCAGTCCA | TAAGCCGGCTGAGATCTTGT | |
| GAAAGGGCCAAACAGAGAGA | GTAAATCACACGGCGCTCTT | |
| AAGGCTGCCGAATGTCAACGAATG | TGCTGGTTCAGACTCACCTTGGAA | |
| GCCTCTCATCCTCTGGTCCT | TGCCATAAACTTCCACATCCT | |
| TGTGATGGTGGGAATGGGTCAGAA | TGTGGTGCCAGATCTTCTCCATGT |
Elemental concentrations of PM2.5 particle during the exposure
| Ambient air | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Mean | |||
| 1142.2 | 1045.7 | 10167.9 | 8038.0 | |
| 244.9 | 145.2 | 1297.9 | 571.0 | |
| 70.0 | 60.1 | 1166.9 | 918.7 | |
| 37.9 | 37.8 | 631.7 | 519.5 | |
| 27.5 | 20.5 | 403.5 | 211.6 | |
| 64.6 | 73.3 | 365.0 | 281.7 | |
| 49.3 | 24.0 | 358.4 | 216.1 | |
| 17.6 | 38.4 | 262.8 | 332.1 | |
| 21.5 | 40.6 | 250.6 | 260.9 | |
| 6.2 | 12.2 | 155.8 | 161.0 | |
| 6.8 | 11.2 | 147.5 | 166.8 | |
| 19.4 | 15.1 | 141.7 | 127.4 | |
| 34.1 | 29.9 | 126.7 | 76.9 | |
| 5.7 | 4.6 | 55.6 | 40.2 | |
| 17.4 | 18.9 | 54.5 | 49.0 | |
| 7.7 | 31.1 | 44.5 | 185.6 | |
| 10.8 | 7.8 | 39.5 | 23.1 | |
| 10.0 | 7.3 | 35.2 | 21.9 | |
| 6.5 | 3.3 | 33.9 | 12.7 | |
| 8.1 | 5.6 | 28.2 | 15.0 | |
| 5.7 | 15.7 | 28.2 | 55.6 | |
| 8.5 | 5.0 | 27.2 | 12.9 | |
| 4.1 | 6.0 | 24.9 | 18.8 | |
| 1.8 | 2.4 | 22.2 | 20.0 | |
| 4.4 | 6.4 | 21.5 | 21.8 | |
| 4.3 | 5.2 | 18.2 | 14.9 | |
| 4.5 | 2.7 | 13.7 | 7.2 | |
| 3.5 | 4.7 | 11.9 | 11.7 | |
| 1.4 | 2.2 | 11.5 | 24.7 | |
| 2.4 | 2.0 | 11.3 | 6.2 | |
| 2.0 | 3.7 | 11.1 | 10.7 | |
| 2.8 | 7.5 | 10.3 | 36.6 | |
| 3.0 | 2.5 | 9.8 | 6.9 | |
| 10.5 | 3.0 | 5.6 | 17.4 | |
| 1.6 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 8.5 | |
Note: unit, ng/m3. s.d., standard deviation.
Figure 1Exposure to PM. A. DHE staining of adipose tissue sections from the mice exposed to PM2.5 or FA for 2 months. Frozen iBAT sections were stained with DHE (10 μmol/L). The oxidative red fluorescence was analyzed by fluorescent microscope. B. DHE signals were quantified by the percentage of DHE-positive areas in 5 random fields. n = 8. *P < 0.05 vs. FA.
Figure 2The number and area of mitochondria in the eWAT and iBAT. A-B. Representative TEM images of eWAT. C-D. Representative TEM images of iBAT (Arrows point to mitochondria). E: The analysis of mitochondrial number per field in the eWAT and iBAT. F: The analysis of mitochondrial area per field in the eWAT and iBAT. n = 4. *P < 0.05 vs. FA. Scale bars represent 500 nm in panels A, B, C and D.
Figure 3PM. A. Immunochemistry for macrophage-specific marker F4/80 in sections of eWAT from FA- and PM2.5-exposed mice. B. Quantification of adipose tissue macrophages in eWAT. n = 4. **P < 0.001 vs. FA. Arrow shows F4/80+ macrophages.
Figure 4Immunohistochemical examination of uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) in the iBAT. A. iBAT was stained by antibody against UCP1 and counterstained with hematoxylin. B. Quantification of UCP1 in iBAT. n = 8 *P < 0.05 vs. FA. Arrows show UCP1-positive brown adipocyte staining.
Figure 5PM. A. Representative bands of FA and PM2.5 on UCP1 protein level in iBAT by Western blotting. B. Quantitative results of Western blotting of UCP1. n = 8. *P <0.05 vs. FA.
Figure 6Effect of PM. n = 8. *P < 0.05 vs. FA.
Figure 7Effect of PM. n = 8. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001 vs. FA.