PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the mammography screening programme in Trento Province, Italy, by analysing the interval cancers (IC) observed from 2001 to 2008. MATERIAL AND METHODS: IC were identified by linking screening archives with local cancer registry and pathology archives as well as with hospital discharge records. Proportional incidence was determined according to breast cancers expected in the absence of screening, estimated on the basis of patients/year at risk and age-specific incidence. The review of screening mammograms preceding ICs was performed by an external (three radiologists) and an internal (five radiologists) panel and aimed at assessing the proportion of IC reviewed as screening errors. Results were compared with European Community (EC) recommended standards. RESULTS: IC proportional incidence was 15.90% for the first year (EC standard <30%) and 25.77% for the second year (EC standard <50%) of the interval. At external review, 18.4% of cases were reviewed as screening errors (identified by at least two of three reviewers), whereas at internal review (identified by at least three of five reviewers) it was 17.4% (EC standard <20%). No significant difference was observed between external and internal review (mean recall rate 8.3% vs. 9.0%; mean identification rate 19.7% vs 19.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms good performance of the mammography screening programme in Trento Province, Italy. Comparable results of external and internal reviews suggest that the latter, no doubt easier to be implemented, might be adopted as a routine procedure to assess this early efficacy indicator.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the mammography screening programme in Trento Province, Italy, by analysing the interval cancers (IC) observed from 2001 to 2008. MATERIAL AND METHODS: IC were identified by linking screening archives with local cancer registry and pathology archives as well as with hospital discharge records. Proportional incidence was determined according to breast cancers expected in the absence of screening, estimated on the basis of patients/year at risk and age-specific incidence. The review of screening mammograms preceding ICs was performed by an external (three radiologists) and an internal (five radiologists) panel and aimed at assessing the proportion of IC reviewed as screening errors. Results were compared with European Community (EC) recommended standards. RESULTS: IC proportional incidence was 15.90% for the first year (EC standard <30%) and 25.77% for the second year (EC standard <50%) of the interval. At external review, 18.4% of cases were reviewed as screening errors (identified by at least two of three reviewers), whereas at internal review (identified by at least three of five reviewers) it was 17.4% (EC standard <20%). No significant difference was observed between external and internal review (mean recall rate 8.3% vs. 9.0%; mean identification rate 19.7% vs 19.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms good performance of the mammography screening programme in Trento Province, Italy. Comparable results of external and internal reviews suggest that the latter, no doubt easier to be implemented, might be adopted as a routine procedure to assess this early efficacy indicator.
Authors: Rossella Burani; Francesco Caimi; Carlo Maggioni; Guia Marinoni; Romana Pellizzoni; Maria Elena Pirola; Roberto Villa; Stefano Ciatto Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: S Ciatto; D Ambrogetti; R Bonardi; S Catarzi; G Risso; M Rosselli Del Turco; P Mantellini Journal: J Med Screen Date: 2005 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: S Ciatto; D Bernardi; M Pellegrini; G Borsato; P Peterlongo; M A Gentilini; F Caumo; A Frigerio; N Houssami Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-12-27 Impact factor: 5.315