Literature DB >> 2384270

Early indicators of efficacy of breast cancer screening programmes. Results of the Florence District Programme.

E Paci1, S Ciatto, E Buiatti, S Cecchini, D Palli, M Rosselli del Turco.   

Abstract

A mammographic breast cancer screening programme has been ongoing in the Florence District (Italy) since 1970 and a favourable impact of screening on breast cancer mortality of women aged 50-70 has been shown by means of a case-control study. Two hundred and eleven screen- and 116 interval-detected cancers in the period 1975-1986 have been identified, and detection rates calculated, for first and repeated screening test (2nd to 7th). Overall, 22,980 subjects were screened and 44,988 repeated tests performed. The observed number of interval cancers has been compared with the expected incident cancers and their ratio (O/E) studied at different time intervals since last test. The O/E ratio at the third year since the last test was 0.98 for the age-group 40-49 0.50 (95% CI: 0.23-0.95) and 0.39 (95% CI: 0.26-0.94) for the 50-59 and 60-69 groups, respectively. The prevalence/incidence ratio (P/I) was then calculated as an early indicator of efficacy. For the 40-49 age-group the P/I ratio at first test was 1.09, suggesting poor anticipation of diagnosis. In contrast, for women 50-59 and 60-69 results suggest quite a good diagnosis anticipation (P/I: 3.14; 4.82), confirming the result of the previous case-control study on mortality reduction. The proportion of advanced carcinomas (stage II or worse) and 5-year survival have been analysed and discussed. The study confirms the opportunity of using early indicators of screening efficacy for monitoring of screening services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2384270     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910460209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  14 in total

1.  Benefits of double reading of screening mammograms: retrospective study on a consecutive series.

Authors:  F Caumo; S Brunelli; M Zorzi; I Baglio; S Ciatto; S Montemezzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Long term breast cancer screening in Nijmegen, The Netherlands: the nine rounds from 1975-92.

Authors:  J D Otten; J A van Dijck; P G Peer; H Straatman; A L Verbeek; M Mravunac; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Real time reading in mammography breast screening.

Authors:  S Ciatto
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Proportional incidence and radiological review of large (T2+) breast cancers as surrogate indicators of screening programme performance.

Authors:  S Ciatto; D Bernardi; M Pellegrini; G Borsato; P Peterlongo; M A Gentilini; F Caumo; A Frigerio; N Houssami
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Analysis of proportional incidence and review of interval cancer cases observed within the mammography screening programme in Trento province, Italy.

Authors:  M Pellegrini; D Bernardi; S Di Michele; P Tuttobene; C Fantò; M Valentini; P Peterlongo; F Caumo; A Frigerio; S Ciatto
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Age-specific sensitivities of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  P G Peer; A L Verbeek; H Straatman; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Breast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening?

Authors:  D Giorgi; E Paci; M Zappa; M Rosselli del Turco
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Evaluating the breast screening programme: the need for surgical audit.

Authors:  F Kee; D Gorman; W Odling-Smee
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Analysis of interval cancers observed in an Italian mammography screening programme (2000-2006).

Authors:  F Caumo; F Vecchiato; M Pellegrini; M Vettorazzi; S Ciatto; S Montemezzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Are increases in mammographic screening still a valid explanation for trends in breast cancer incidence in the United States?

Authors:  L M Wun; E J Feuer; B A Miller
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.