Literature DB >> 21744139

Agreement in regard to total sleep time during a nap obtained via a sleep polygraph and accelerometer: a comparison of different sensitivity thresholds of the accelerometer.

Tomoyuki Kawada1, Hiroko Suzuki, Takako Shimizu, Masao Katsumata.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appropriate sensitivity threshold of accelerometer to measure total sleep time during nap is not established.
PURPOSE: Actigraphy-derived total sleep times during naps were calculated using three different sensitivity threshold values and compared with polysomnography.
METHOD: The mean age of the 60 subjects (53 men and 7 women) was 22.8, ranging from 22 to 27 years. Determination of the sleep stage by the polygraph and the sleep/wake judgment by the accelerometer obeyed the sleep/wake judgment, and the accelerometer was monitored under different sensitivity threshold settings. The study was carried out during one afternoon with a 3-h nap opportunity. Kappa statistics, correlations, and several indices of accuracy were compared using statistical methods.
RESULTS: The mean total sleep times during a nap set for 180 min were 160.4, 151.8, and 140.5 min, respectively, as judged under the low-sensitive, middle-sensitive, high-sensitive settings of an accelerometer worn on the non-dominant wrist. The corresponding mean total sleep time as calculated using a sleep polygraph was 133.0 min. Sleep/wake judgment by three levels of threshold values for the accelerometer showed that high-sensitive threshold showed relatively high specificity (0.452) compared with specificities by the low-sensitive threshold (0.249) or by the middle-sensitive threshold (0.358). The concordance correlation coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (in parenthesis) between the total sleep time judged by polygraph and low-sensitive, middle-sensitive, or high-sensitive accelerometer were 0.40 (0.26-0.51), 0.53 (0.38-0.65), and 0.64 (0.49-0.75), respectively. The Bland-Altman plot of the measurements showed higher agreement between the total sleep time by polygraph and by the accelerometer using the high-sensitive threshold.
CONCLUSIONS: From the result obtained in this study, the high-sensitive accelerometer showed the strongest agreement of total sleep time and sleep/wake judgment with the calculated value using the sleep polygraph.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21744139     DOI: 10.1007/s12529-011-9180-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Behav Med        ISSN: 1070-5503


  8 in total

1.  Proposed supplements and amendments to 'A Manual of Standardized Terminology, Techniques and Scoring System for Sleep Stages of Human Subjects', the Rechtschaffen & Kales (1968) standard.

Authors:  T Hori; Y Sugita; E Koga; S Shirakawa; K Inoue; S Uchida; H Kuwahara; M Kousaka; T Kobayashi; Y Tsuji; M Terashima; K Fukuda; N Fukuda
Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.188

2.  The measurement of sleep by actigraphy: direct comparison of 2 commercially available actigraphs in a nonclinical population.

Authors:  Kathleen Benson; Leah Friedman; Art Noda; Deryl Wicks; Edward Wakabayashi; Jerome Yesavage
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Actigraphic assessment of a polysomnographic-recorded nap: a validation study.

Authors:  Jennifer C Kanady; Sean P A Drummond; Sara C Mednick
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.981

4.  Wake detection capacity of actigraphy during sleep.

Authors:  Jean Paquet; Anna Kawinska; Julie Carrier
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  Sleep assessments in healthy school-aged children using actigraphy: concordance with polysomnography.

Authors:  Karen Spruyt; David Gozal; Ehab Dayyat; Adrienne Roman; Dennis L Molfese
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.981

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Sex differences in subjective and actigraphic sleep measures: a population-based study of elderly persons.

Authors:  Julia F van den Berg; Henk M E Miedema; Joke H M Tulen; Albert Hofman; Arie Knuistingh Neven; Henning Tiemeier
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the assessment of sleep and sleep disorders: an update for 2007.

Authors:  Timothy Morgenthaler; Cathy Alessi; Leah Friedman; Judith Owens; Vishesh Kapur; Brian Boehlecke; Terry Brown; Andrew Chesson; Jack Coleman; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Jeffrey Pancer; Todd J Swick
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.849

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Sleep duration, obesity, and insulin resistance for children.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kawada
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Actigraphy-based sleep estimation in adolescents and adults: a comparison with polysomnography using two scoring algorithms.

Authors:  Mirja Quante; Emily R Kaplan; Michael Cailler; Michael Rueschman; Rui Wang; Jia Weng; Elsie M Taveras; Susan Redline
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2018-01-18

3.  Influence of Sleep Duration on Postpartum Weight Change in Black and Hispanic Women.

Authors:  Sharon J Herring; Daohai Yu; Andrea Spaeth; Grace Pien; Niesha Darden; Valerie Riis; Veronica Bersani; Jessica Wallen; Adam Davey; Gary D Foster
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2018-12-30       Impact factor: 5.002

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.