Literature DB >> 20626612

Actigraphic assessment of a polysomnographic-recorded nap: a validation study.

Jennifer C Kanady1, Sean P A Drummond, Sara C Mednick.   

Abstract

This study aimed to determine if actigraphy could differentiate sleep and wake during a daytime nap and no-nap rest period. Fifty-seven subjects participated in the study; 30 subjects were in the nap group and the remaining 27 in the no-nap comparison group. All subjects wore actigraphs while simultaneously undergoing polysomnography (PSG). Three actigraphic sensitivity levels (high, medium, low) and two interval duration minimums (15 and 40 min) were used to score the nap and no-nap data. The variables examined included total sleep time (TST), sleep latency (SL), wake after sleep onset (WASO) and sleep efficiency (SE). The Bland-Altman technique was used to determine concordance. Epoch-by-epoch analysis examined actigraphic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. For the naps, all actigraph settings except low-40 showed significant correlations with TST. The high and medium settings predicted SE significantly and the high settings predicted SL significantly. Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated high settings overestimated TST while high and medium settings overestimated SE. Overall, for the nap condition accuracy for the actigraph was 82-86%, sensitivity was 92-96% and specificity was 40-67%. In the no-nap condition, accuracy for the actigraph was 60-84%, sensitivity was 47-78% and specificity was 60-86%. Medium-40 and low-40 were the only settings that did not misidentify sleep in the no-nap condition. These results suggest that actigraphy can predict TST, SE and SL reliably, depending upon parameter settings, and actigraphy is a highly sensitive but not specific measure for daytime naps. Different actigraphy settings may be optimal depending upon the variables of interest. Discrimination of sleep and wake during periods of waking quiescence is not as robust as during periods of mainly daytime sleep.
© 2010 European Sleep Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20626612     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2010.00858.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sleep Res        ISSN: 0962-1105            Impact factor:   3.981


  34 in total

1.  Performance of a Portable Sleep Monitoring Device in Individuals with High Versus Low Sleep Efficiency.

Authors:  Rachel R Markwald; Sara C Bessman; Seth A Reini; Sean P A Drummond
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Chronotype variation drives night-time sentinel-like behaviour in hunter-gatherers.

Authors:  David R Samson; Alyssa N Crittenden; Ibrahim A Mabulla; Audax Z P Mabulla; Charles L Nunn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Relation between ambulatory actigraphy and laboratory polysomnography in insomnia practice and research.

Authors:  Dana Withrow; Thomas Roth; Gail Koshorek; Timothy Roehrs
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.981

4.  Natural sleep and its seasonal variations in three pre-industrial societies.

Authors:  Gandhi Yetish; Hillard Kaplan; Michael Gurven; Brian Wood; Herman Pontzer; Paul R Manger; Charles Wilson; Ronald McGregor; Jerome M Siegel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Validation of an automated wireless system for sleep monitoring during daytime naps.

Authors:  Nicola Cellini; Elizabeth A McDevitt; Ashley A Ricker; Kelly M Rowe; Sara C Mednick
Journal:  Behav Sleep Med       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 2.964

6.  Validation of sleep measurement in a multisensor consumer grade wearable device in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Jennifer C Kanady; Leslie Ruoff; Laura D Straus; Jonathan Varbel; Thomas Metzler; Anne Richards; Sabra S Inslicht; Aoife O'Donovan; Jennifer Hlavin; Thomas C Neylan
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  Agreement in regard to total sleep time during a nap obtained via a sleep polygraph and accelerometer: a comparison of different sensitivity thresholds of the accelerometer.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kawada; Hiroko Suzuki; Takako Shimizu; Masao Katsumata
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2012-09

8.  The 8-Hour Challenge: Incentivizing Sleep during End-of-Term Assessments.

Authors:  Elise King; Michael K Scullin
Journal:  J Inter Des       Date:  2018-11-18

Review 9.  Actigraphy for measurement of sleep and sleep-wake rhythms in relation to surgery.

Authors:  Michael T Madsen; Jacob Rosenberg; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

10.  Cold hands, warm feet: sleep deprivation disrupts thermoregulation and its association with vigilance.

Authors:  Nico Romeijn; Ilse M Verweij; Anne Koeleman; Anne Mooij; Rosa Steimke; Jussi Virkkala; Ysbrand van der Werf; Eus J W Van Someren
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 5.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.