Literature DB >> 21741820

Comparison of setup error using different reference images: a phantom and lung cancer patients study.

Bo Jiang1, Jianrong Dai, Ye Zhang, Ke Zhang, Kuo Men, Zongmei Zhou, Jun Liang, Lvhua Wang.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare setup errors obtained with kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 2 different kinds of reference images, free-breathing 3D localization CT images (FB-CT) and the average images of 4-D localization CT images (AVG-CT) for phantom and lung cancer patients. This study also explored the correlation between the difference of translational setup errors and the gross tumor volume (GTV) motion. A respiratory phantom and 14 patients were enrolled in this study. For phantom and each patient, 3D helical CT and 4D CT images were acquired, and AVG-CT images were generated from the 4D CT. The setup errors were determined based on the image registration between the CBCT and the 2 different reference images, respectively. The data for both translational and rotational setup errors were analyzed and compared. The GTV centroid movement as well as its correlation with the translational setup error differences was also evaluated. In the phantom study, the AVG-CT method was more accurate than the FB-CT method. For patients, the translational setup errors based on FB-CT were significantly larger than those from AVG-CT in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions (p < 0.05). Translational setup errors differed by >1 mm in 32.6% and >2 mm in 12.9% of CBCT scans. The rotational setup errors from FB-CT were significantly different from those from AVG-CT in the LR and AP directions (p < 0.05). The correlation coefficient of the translational setup error differences and the GTV centroid movement in the LR, SI, and AP directions was 0.515 (p = 0.060), 0.902 (p < 0.001), and 0.510 (p = 0.062), respectively. For lung cancer patients, respiration may affect the on-line target position location. AVG-CT provides different reference information than FB-CT. The difference in SI direction caused by the 2 methods increases with the GTV movement. Therefore, AVG-CT should be the prefered choice of reference images. Copyright Â
© 2012 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21741820     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2011.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  7 in total

1.  Reconstructing cone-beam CT with spatially varying qualities for adaptive radiotherapy: a proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  Wenting Lu; Hao Yan; Xuejun Gu; Zhen Tian; Ouyang Luo; Liu Yang; Linghong Zhou; Laura Cervino; Jing Wang; Steve Jiang; Xun Jia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: setup reproducibility with novel arms-down immobilization.

Authors:  Karen Moore; Claire Paterson; Jonathan Hicks; Stephen Harrow; Mark McJury
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Interobserver variability of patient positioning using four different CT datasets for image registration in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Markus Oechsner; Barbara Chizzali; Michal Devecka; Stefan Münch; Stephanie Elisabeth Combs; Jan Jakob Wilkens; Marciana Nona Duma
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Registration uncertainties between 3D cone beam computed tomography and different reference CT datasets in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Markus Oechsner; Barbara Chizzali; Michal Devecka; Stephanie Elisabeth Combs; Jan Jakob Wilkens; Marciana Nona Duma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Development of a novel airbag system of abdominal compression for reducing respiratory motion: preliminary results in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Wenxin Li; Kenta Konishi; Keiichi Ohira; Masanori Hirata; Kohei Wakabayashi; Shuhei Aramaki; Masataka Sakamoto; Katsumasa Nakamura
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.438

6.  Accuracy of image guidance using free-breathing cone-beam computed tomography for stereotactic lung radiotherapy.

Authors:  Takeshi Kamomae; Hajime Monzen; Shinichi Nakayama; Rika Mizote; Yuuichi Oonishi; Soichiro Kaneshige; Takashi Sakamoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Inter- and intrafractional setup errors and baseline shifts of fiducial markers in patients with liver tumors receiving free-breathing postoperative radiation analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Weihu Wang; Yexiong Li; Jing Jin; Shulian Wang; Yongwen Song; Yueping Liu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.