OBJECTIVE: To present a conceptual framework of caregiver coping and adaptation to early cleft care using nasoalveolar molding. DESIGN: In-depth interviews were conducted at three time points with caregivers of infants with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate whose children had nasoalveolar molding to treat their cleft. Qualitative data were analyzed using modified grounded theory. RESULTS: Most caregivers expressed initial apprehension and anxiety about the responsibilities of care associated with nasoalveolar molding (e.g., changing and positioning tapes, cleaning the appliance). In subsequent interviews, caregivers often reported positive feelings related to their active participation in their child's treatment for cleft. These positive feelings were associated with increased self-esteem and feelings of empowerment for the caregivers. Although caregivers also identified burdens associated with nasoalveolar molding (e.g., stress related to lip taping, concerns about the appliance causing sores in their child's mouth, travel to weekly appointments), they tended to minimize the impact of these issues in comparison with the perceived benefits of nasoalveolar molding. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increased burden of care, many caregivers of infants with cleft used nasoalveolar molding as a problem-focused coping strategy to deal with their child's cleft. Completing nasoalveolar molding was often associated with positive factors such as increased empowerment, self-esteem, and bonding with their infant.
OBJECTIVE: To present a conceptual framework of caregiver coping and adaptation to early cleft care using nasoalveolar molding. DESIGN: In-depth interviews were conducted at three time points with caregivers of infants with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate whose children had nasoalveolar molding to treat their cleft. Qualitative data were analyzed using modified grounded theory. RESULTS: Most caregivers expressed initial apprehension and anxiety about the responsibilities of care associated with nasoalveolar molding (e.g., changing and positioning tapes, cleaning the appliance). In subsequent interviews, caregivers often reported positive feelings related to their active participation in their child's treatment for cleft. These positive feelings were associated with increased self-esteem and feelings of empowerment for the caregivers. Although caregivers also identified burdens associated with nasoalveolar molding (e.g., stress related to lip taping, concerns about the appliance causing sores in their child's mouth, travel to weekly appointments), they tended to minimize the impact of these issues in comparison with the perceived benefits of nasoalveolar molding. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increased burden of care, many caregivers of infants with cleft used nasoalveolar molding as a problem-focused coping strategy to deal with their child's cleft. Completing nasoalveolar molding was often associated with positive factors such as increased empowerment, self-esteem, and bonding with their infant.
Entities:
Keywords:
burden of care; cleft; coping; nasoalveolar molding; qualitative
Authors: Marcos Jaeger; Jefferson Braga-Silva; Daniel Gehlen; Yuki Sato; Ronald Zuker; David Fisher Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 1.539
Authors: Catherine T H Lee; Judah S Garfinkle; Stephen M Warren; Lawrence E Brecht; Court B Cutting; Barry H Grayson Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Hillary L Broder; Roberto L Flores; Sean Clouston; Richard E Kirschner; Judah S Garfinkle; Lacey Sischo; Ceib Phillips Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Michelle Kornbluth; Richard E Campbell; John Daskalogiannakis; Elizabeth J Ross; Patricia H Glick; Kathleen A Russell; Jean-Charles Doucet; Ronald R Hathaway; Ross E Long; Thomas J Sitzman Journal: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Date: 2018-02-20
Authors: A Quast; J Waschkau; J Saptschak; N Daratsianos; K Jordan; P Fromberger; J L Müller; P Meyer-Marcotty Journal: J Orofac Orthop Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 1.938
Authors: Maximilian Roth; Daniel Lonic; Florian D Grill; Lucas M Ritschl; Denys J Loeffelbein; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Lien-Shin Niu; Betty Chien-Jung Pai; Lukas Prantl; Andreas Kehrer; Paul I Heidekrüger; Andrea Rau; Lun-Jou Lo Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 3.573