V A Coenen1, C Jenkner2, C R Honey3, B Mädler4. 1. From the Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (V.A.C., B.M.) volker.coenen@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 2. the Clinical Trial Unit (C.J.), Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany. 3. Surgical Center for Movement Disorders/Division of Neurosurgery (C.R.H.). 4. From the Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (V.A.C., B.M.) Department of Physics and Astronomy (B.M.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Philips Healthcare (B.M.), Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion tensor imaging fiber tractography-assisted planning of deep brain stimulation is an emerging technology. We investigated its accuracy by using electrophysiology under clinical conditions. We hypothesized that a level of concordance between electrophysiology and DTI fiber tractography can be reached, comparable with published modeling approaches for deep brain stimulation surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients underwent subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. DTI scans and high-resolution T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging was performed at 3T. Corticospinal tracts were traced. We studied electrode positions and current amplitudes that elicited corticospinal tract effects during the operation to determine relative corticospinal tract distance. Postoperatively, 3D deep brain stimulation electrode contact locations and stimulation patterns were applied for the same corticospinal tract distance estimation. RESULTS: Intraoperative electrophysiologic (n = 40) clinical effects in 11 patients were detected. The mean intraoperative electrophysiologic corticospinal tract distance was 3.0 ± 0.6 mm; the mean image-derived corticospinal tract distance (DTI fiber tractography) was 3.0 ± 1.3 mm. The 95% limits of agreement were ±2.4 mm. Postoperative electrophysiology (n = 44) corticospinal tract activation effects were encountered in 9 patients; 39 were further evaluated. Mean electrophysiologic corticospinal tract distance was 3.7 ± 0.7 mm; for DTI fiber tractography, it was 3.2 ± 1.9 mm. The 95% limits of agreement were ±2.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: DTI fiber tractography depicted the medial corticospinal tract border with proved concordance. Although the overall range of measurements was relatively small and variance was high, we believe that further use of DTI fiber tractography to assist deep brain stimulation procedures is advisable if inherent limitations are respected. These results confirm our previously published electric field simulation studies.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion tensor imaging fiber tractography-assisted planning of deep brain stimulation is an emerging technology. We investigated its accuracy by using electrophysiology under clinical conditions. We hypothesized that a level of concordance between electrophysiology and DTI fiber tractography can be reached, comparable with published modeling approaches for deep brain stimulation surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients underwent subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. DTI scans and high-resolution T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging was performed at 3T. Corticospinal tracts were traced. We studied electrode positions and current amplitudes that elicited corticospinal tract effects during the operation to determine relative corticospinal tract distance. Postoperatively, 3D deep brain stimulation electrode contact locations and stimulation patterns were applied for the same corticospinal tract distance estimation. RESULTS: Intraoperative electrophysiologic (n = 40) clinical effects in 11 patients were detected. The mean intraoperative electrophysiologic corticospinal tract distance was 3.0 ± 0.6 mm; the mean image-derived corticospinal tract distance (DTI fiber tractography) was 3.0 ± 1.3 mm. The 95% limits of agreement were ±2.4 mm. Postoperative electrophysiology (n = 44) corticospinal tract activation effects were encountered in 9 patients; 39 were further evaluated. Mean electrophysiologic corticospinal tract distance was 3.7 ± 0.7 mm; for DTI fiber tractography, it was 3.2 ± 1.9 mm. The 95% limits of agreement were ±2.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: DTI fiber tractography depicted the medial corticospinal tract border with proved concordance. Although the overall range of measurements was relatively small and variance was high, we believe that further use of DTI fiber tractography to assist deep brain stimulation procedures is advisable if inherent limitations are respected. These results confirm our previously published electric field simulation studies.
Authors: Setsu Wakana; Hangyi Jiang; Lidia M Nagae-Poetscher; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-11-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Kathryn L Holloway; Steven E Gaede; Philip A Starr; Joshua M Rosenow; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Jaimie M Henderson Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Garni Barkhoudarian; Tony Klochkov; Mark Sedrak; Andrew Frew; Alessandra Gorgulho; Eric Behnke; Antonio De Salles Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2010-07-21 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Thomas E Schlaepfer; Bettina H Bewernick; Sarah Kayser; Burkhard Mädler; Volker A Coenen Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: András Jakab; Beat Werner; Marco Piccirelli; Kázmér Kovács; Ernst Martin; John S Thornton; Tarek Yousry; Gabor Szekely; Ruth O'Gorman Tuura Journal: Front Neuroanat Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 3.856
Authors: Volker A Coenen; Bastian E Sajonz; Marco Reisert; Horst Urbach; Peter C Reinacher Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2020-04-26 Impact factor: 2.216