Literature DB >> 21738093

A prospective randomized FDA-IDE trial comparing Cortoss with PMMA for vertebroplasty: a comparative effectiveness research study with 24-month follow-up.

Hyun Bae1, Homer Paul Hatten, Raymond Linovitz, A David Tahernia, Michael K Schaufele, Vance McCollom, Louis Gilula, Philip Maurer, Ramsin Benyamin, John M Mathis, Maarten Persenaire.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, prospective (AAOS therapeutic level I) trial conducted under Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption hypothesized noninferiority of a novel bioactive composite material to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA).
OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of a new, nonresorbable bioactive composite (Cortoss) compared with PMMA, the standard treatment of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebroplasty with PMMA, the widely adopted treatment for VCFs nonresponsive to conservative care, provides effective, immediate pain relief, but the material has received criticism for its properties. A new bioactive composite material designed specifically for vertebroplasty showed promising results in animals and nonrandomized clinical studies and was subsequently compared with PMMA in a randomized study. This study represents the first prospective study evaluating vertebroplasty comparing PMMA with another material with 24-month follow-up.
METHODS: Using 2:1 randomization, vertebroplasty was performed with Cortoss on 162 patients and PMMA on 94 patients. Inclusion criteria were painful osteoporotic VCFs with a visual analogue scale pain score of at least 50 mm on a 100-mm scale and at least 30% disability as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index. Evaluations at pretreatment, treatment day, and 7 posttreatment intervals out to 24 months included pain, disability, neurological status, adverse events, quality of life, patient satisfaction, analgesic use, and independently reviewed radiographs.
RESULTS: Noninferiority of Cortoss relative to PMMA was observed, with Cortoss-treated patients experiencing significant pain relief at 3 months (P = 0.0395) and better maintenance or improvement in function at 24 months (P = 0.0299). Incidence of serious device-related adverse events was 4.3% in both groups; none were life threatening.
CONCLUSION: Vertebroplasty using either Cortoss or PMMA provides effective, immediate, and lasting pain relief and prevents further loss of function. Both materials performed comparably at most time points; Cortoss demonstrated better results for pain reduction at 3 months and for function at 24 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21738093     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ba50b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Authors:  Bradley S Duhon; Fabien Bitan; Harry Lockstadt; Don Kovalsky; Daniel Cher; Travis Hillen
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-04-20

2.  Critique of the analysis of UpToDate.com on the treatment of painful vertebral compression fractures: time to update UpToDate.

Authors:  D P Beall; W P McRoberts; S H Berven; J T Ledlie; S M Tutton; B P Parsons
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Optimizing bone cement stiffness for vertebroplasty through biomechanical effects analysis based on patient-specific three-dimensional finite element modeling.

Authors:  Yi Peng; Xianping Du; Lihua Huang; Jinsong Li; Ruisen Zhan; Weiguo Wang; Biaoxiang Xu; Song Wu; Cheng Peng; Shijie Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  [Biocompatibility of polymer-bioglass cement Cortoss®: in vitro test with the MG63 cell model].

Authors:  C Fölsch; R Pinkernell; R Stiletto
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Modification of PMMA vertebroplasty cement for reduced stiffness by addition of normal saline: a material properties evaluation.

Authors:  Christian Schröder; Mai Nguyen; Michael Kraxenberger; Yan Chevalier; Carolin Melcher; Bernd Wegener; Christof Birkenmaier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Subsequent fractures post-vertebral augmentation: analysis of a prospective randomized trial in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  L Gilula; M Persenaire
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Screw augmentation for spinopelvic fixation in neuromuscular spine deformities: technical note.

Authors:  Arnaud Dubory; Manon Bachy; Houssam Bouloussa; Aurélien Courvoisier; Baptiste Morel; Raphaël Vialle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Creep and fatigue behavior of a novel 2-component paste-like formulation of acrylic bone cements.

Authors:  Ulrike Köster; Raimund Jaeger; Mareike Bardts; Christian Wahnes; Hubert Büchner; Klaus-Dieter Kühn; Sebastian Vogt
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Superiority Claims for Spinal Devices: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  S Raymond Golish; Michael W Groff; Ali Araghi; Jason A Inzana
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-06-07

10.  Effect of bone cement volume and stiffness on occurrences of adjacent vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Jin-Myung Kim; Dong Ah Shin; Dong-Hak Byun; Hyung-Sun Kim; Sohee Kim; Hyoung-Ihl Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.