Literature DB >> 21735181

UES pressure during phonation using high-resolution manometry and 24-h dual-probe pH-metry in patients with muscle tension dysphonia.

Evelyne Van Houtte1, Kristiane Van Lierde, Evelien D'haeseleer, Bart Van Imschoot, Sofie Claeys.   

Abstract

Muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) is the pathological condition in which excessive tension of the (para)laryngeal musculature leads to a disturbed voice. This study was developed to investigate if differences in pressure in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) were present in patients with MTD in comparison with normal speakers. Concurrently, all patients were screened for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as an associated cause or aggravating factor in MTD. The study's design was a prospective case-control study. Fourteen patients with MTD (mean age = 40.2 years, range = 22-62 years) and 14 adult controls (mean age = 33.9 years, range = 23-58 years) were studied. A water-perfusion assembly with 22 sensors was positioned to record pressures during phonation. The mean values of the phonation pressures at the UES were measured. All patients underwent a dual-probe 24-h ambulatory pH impedance in order to measure the pH and the height of the refluxes from the lower esophageal sphincter to the hypopharynx. There were no significant differences in the UES pressures of patients with MTD compared to those of normal speakers during phonation tasks and reading. Two patients were identified with GERD. In these patients the refluxate reached the UES but this did not influence the UES pressures. We conclude that this study was not able to detect differences in phonation-induced UES pressures between patients with MTD and normal speakers using a standard water-perfusion high-resolution manometry assembly. Future investigation should be focused on developing probes with closely spaced sensors in the hypopharynx and the esophagus in order to investigate if differences in UES pressures in these study populations are present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21735181     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-011-9354-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  24 in total

1.  A new stroboscopy rating form.

Authors:  B J Poburka
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  24-H pharyngeal pH monitoring in healthy volunteers: a normative study.

Authors:  M Bove; M Ruth; L Cange; I Månsson
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  Prevalence of laryngeal irritation signs associated with reflux in asymptomatic volunteers: impact of endoscopic technique (rigid vs. flexible laryngoscope).

Authors:  Claudio F Milstein; Samer Charbel; Douglas M Hicks; Tom I Abelson; Joel E Richter; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Esophagolaryngeal reflex in a porcine animal model.

Authors:  C Gill; M D Morrison
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1998-04

5.  The dysphonia severity index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach.

Authors:  F L Wuyts; M S De Bodt; G Molenberghs; M Remacle; L Heylen; B Millet; K Van Lierde; J Raes; P H Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 6.  Current and emerging concepts in muscle tension dysphonia: a 30-month review.

Authors:  Kenneth W Altman; Cory Atkinson; Cathy Lazarus
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Upper esophageal sphincter function during gastroesophageal reflux events revisited.

Authors:  S Torrico; M Kern; M Aslam; S Narayanan; A Kannappan; J Ren; Z Sui; C Hofmann; R Shaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.052

8.  Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10.

Authors:  Clark A Rosen; Annie S Lee; Jamie Osborne; Thomas Zullo; Thomas Murry
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Manometric evidence for a phonation-induced UES contractile reflex.

Authors:  Lilani Perera; Mark Kern; Candy Hofmann; Linda Tatro; Krisna Chai; Shiko Kuribayashi; Adeyemi Lawal; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 4.052

10.  Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI).

Authors:  Peter C Belafsky; Gregory N Postma; James A Koufman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The upper esophageal sphincter in the high-resolution manometry era.

Authors:  Pedro Norton; Fernando A M Herbella; Francisco Schlottmann; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Laryngeal Manipulation for Dysphagia with Muscle Tension Dysphonia.

Authors:  Joseph D DePietro; Samuel Rubin; Daniel J Stein; Hadas Golan; J Pieter Noordzij
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Prevalence of MTD among Patients with Functional Dysphagia.

Authors:  Abdul-Latif Hamdan; Georges Ziade; Elie Khalifee; Nader Al Souky; Hussein Jaffal; Tamer El Natout
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2018-08-09

4.  Comorbid Dysphagia and Dyspnea in Muscle Tension Dysphonia: A Global Laryngeal Musculoskeletal Problem.

Authors:  Patrick O McGarey; Nicholas A Barone; Michael Freeman; James J Daniero
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2018-08-24

5.  Bolus transit of upper esophageal sphincter on high-resolution impedance manometry study correlate with the laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms.

Authors:  Jia-Feng Wu; Wei-Chung Hsu; I-Jung Tsai; Tzu-Wei Tong; Yu-Cheng Lin; Chia-Hsiang Yang; Ping-Huei Tseng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.