Literature DB >> 10498056

A new stroboscopy rating form.

B J Poburka1.   

Abstract

A newly developed stroboscopy rating form is presented. The evolution of the new form is discussed by focusing on how problems with another commonly used form led to its development. Interjudge agreement and intrajudge reliability data for the new rating form reveal that the parameters of phase closure, phase symmetry, and phase regularity remain difficult to rate even with the revised rating form.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10498056     DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(99)80045-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  12 in total

Review 1.  Rater methodology for stroboscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Kendrea L Focht; Bonnie Martin-Harris
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  UES pressure during phonation using high-resolution manometry and 24-h dual-probe pH-metry in patients with muscle tension dysphonia.

Authors:  Evelyne Van Houtte; Kristiane Van Lierde; Evelien D'haeseleer; Bart Van Imschoot; Sofie Claeys
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Is Acupuncture Efficacious for Treating Phonotraumatic Vocal Pathologies? A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Edwin M L Yiu; Karen M K Chan; Elaine Kwong; Nicole Y K Li; Estella P M Ma; Fred W Tse; Zhixiu Lin; Katherine Verdolini Abbott; Raymond Tsang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Synchronized, concurrent optical coherence tomography and videostroboscopy for monitoring vocal fold morphology and kinematics.

Authors:  Gopi Maguluri; Daryush Mehta; James Kobler; Jesung Park; Nicusor Iftimia
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Current role of stroboscopy in laryngeal imaging.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Prospective multi-arm evaluation of surgical treatments for vocal fold scar and pathologic sulcus vocalis.

Authors:  Nathan V Welham; Seong Hee Choi; Seth H Dailey; Charles N Ford; Jack J Jiang; Diane M Bless
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Effect of energy-based devices on voice quality after total thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Server Sezgin Uludag; Serkan Teksoz; Akif Enes Arikan; Ozge Tarhan; Haydar Murat Yener; Murat Ozcan; Whitney Liddy; Gregory William Randolph
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Efficacy of Videostroboscopy and High-Speed Videoendoscopy to Obtain Functional Outcomes From Perioperative Ratings in Patients With Vocal Fold Mass Lesions.

Authors:  Maria E Powell; Dimitar D Deliyski; Steven M Zeitels; James A Burns; Robert E Hillman; Terri Treman Gerlach; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Parameters and Scales Used to Assess and Report Findings From Stroboscopy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Maude Desjardins; Kendrea L Garand; Bonnie Martin-Harris
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Comparison of Videostroboscopy to Stroboscopy Derived From High-Speed Videoendoscopy for Evaluating Patients With Vocal Fold Mass Lesions.

Authors:  Maria E Powell; Dimitar D Deliyski; Robert E Hillman; Steven M Zeitels; James A Burns; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.