Literature DB >> 21734399

The structure of genetic linkage data: from LIPED to 1M SNPs.

Elizabeth Thompson1.   

Abstract

There are three assumptions of independence or conditional independence that underlie linkage likelihood computations on sets of related individuals. The first is the independence of meioses, which gives rise to the conditional independence of haplotypes carried by offspring, given those of their parents. The second derives from the assumption of absence of genetic interference, which gives rise to the conditional independence of inheritance vectors, given the inheritance vector at an intermediate location. The third is the assumption of independence of allelic types, at the population level, both among haplotypes of unrelated individuals and also over the loci along a given haplotype. These three assumptions have been integral to likelihood computations since the first lod scores were computed, and remain key components in analysis of modern genetic data. In this paper we trace the role of these assumptions through the history of linkage likelihood computation, through to a new framework of genetic linkage analysis in the era of dense genomic marker data.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21734399      PMCID: PMC3136382          DOI: 10.1159/000313555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  16 in total

1.  Sequential tests for the detection of linkage.

Authors:  N E MORTON
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1955-09       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Optimizing exact genetic linkage computations.

Authors:  Ma'ayan Fishelson; Dan Geiger
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Handling marker-marker linkage disequilibrium: pedigree analysis with clustered markers.

Authors:  Gonçalo R Abecasis; Janis E Wigginton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Multipoint linkage analysis with many multiallelic or dense diallelic markers: Markov chain-Monte Carlo provides practical approaches for genome scans on general pedigrees.

Authors:  Ellen M Wijsman; Joseph H Rothstein; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Multilocus lod scores in large pedigrees: combination of exact and approximate calculations.

Authors:  Liping Tong; Elizabeth Thompson
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 0.444

6.  A new estimate of the linkage between the genes for colourblindness and haemophilia in man.

Authors:  J B S HALDANE; C A B SMITH
Journal:  Ann Eugen       Date:  1947-10

7.  Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis for oligogenic models.

Authors:  S C Heath
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Descent graphs in pedigree analysis: applications to haplotyping, location scores, and marker-sharing statistics.

Authors:  E Sobel; K Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data.

Authors:  R C Elston; J Stewart
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 0.444

10.  Limits of resolution of genetic linkage studies: implications for the positional cloning of human disease genes.

Authors:  M Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  30 in total

1.  Estimation and visualization of identity-by-descent within pedigrees simplifies interpretation of complex trait analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Marchani; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  Computationally efficient multipoint linkage analysis on extended pedigrees for trait models with two contributing major Loci.

Authors:  Ming Su; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  PBAP: a pipeline for file processing and quality control of pedigree data with dense genetic markers.

Authors:  Alejandro Q Nato; Nicola H Chapman; Harkirat K Sohi; Hiep D Nguyen; Zoran Brkanac; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Identity by descent: variation in meiosis, across genomes, and in populations.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Efficient identification of equivalences in dynamic graphs and pedigree structures.

Authors:  Hoyt Koepke; Elizabeth Thompson
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.479

6.  Power of family-based association designs to detect rare variants in large pedigrees using imputed genotypes.

Authors:  Mohamad Saad; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Linkage and association of phospholipid transfer protein activity to LASS4.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Rosenthal; James Ronald; Joseph Rothstein; Ramakrishnan Rajagopalan; Jane Ranchalis; G Wolfbauer; John J Albers; John D Brunzell; Arno G Motulsky; Mark J Rieder; Deborah A Nickerson; Ellen M Wijsman; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.922

8.  GIGI: an approach to effective imputation of dense genotypes on large pedigrees.

Authors:  Charles Y K Cheung; Elizabeth A Thompson; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  A statistical framework to guide sequencing choices in pedigrees.

Authors:  Charles Y K Cheung; Elizabeth Marchani Blue; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Visualization of haplotype sharing patterns in pedigree samples.

Authors:  Sulgi Kim; Mohamad Saad; Debby W Tsuang; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 0.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.