Literature DB >> 17033961

Multipoint linkage analysis with many multiallelic or dense diallelic markers: Markov chain-Monte Carlo provides practical approaches for genome scans on general pedigrees.

Ellen M Wijsman1, Joseph H Rothstein, Elizabeth A Thompson.   

Abstract

Computations for genome scans need to adapt to the increasing use of dense diallelic markers as well as of full-chromosome multipoint linkage analysis with either diallelic or multiallelic markers. Whereas suitable exact-computation tools are available for use with small pedigrees, equivalent exact computation for larger pedigrees remains infeasible. Markov chain-Monte Carlo (MCMC)-based methods currently provide the only computationally practical option. To date, no systematic comparison of the performance of MCMC-based programs is available, nor have these programs been systematically evaluated for use with dense diallelic markers. Using simulated data, we evaluate the performance of two MCMC-based linkage-analysis programs--lm_markers from the MORGAN package and SimWalk2--under a variety of analysis conditions. Pedigrees consisted of 14, 52, or 98 individuals in 3, 5, or 6 generations, respectively, with increasing amounts of missing data in larger pedigrees. One hundred replicates of markers and trait data were simulated on a 100-cM chromosome, with up to 10 multiallelic and up to 200 diallelic markers used simultaneously for computation of multipoint LOD scores. Exact computation was available for comparison in most situations, and comparison with a perfectly informative marker or interprogram comparison was available in the remaining situations. Our results confirm the accuracy of both programs in multipoint analysis with multiallelic markers on pedigrees of varied sizes and missing-data patterns, but there are some computational differences. In contrast, for large numbers of dense diallelic markers, only the lm_markers program was able to provide accurate results within a computationally practical time. Thus, programs in the MORGAN package are the first available to provide a computationally practical option for accurate linkage analyses in genome scans with both large numbers of diallelic markers and large pedigrees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17033961      PMCID: PMC1698573          DOI: 10.1086/508472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  41 in total

1.  Conditional probability methods for haplotyping in pedigrees.

Authors:  Guimin Gao; Ina Hoeschele; Peter Sorensen; Fengxing Du
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  A random walk method for computing genetic location scores.

Authors:  K Lange; E Sobel
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Programs for Pedigree Analysis: MENDEL, FISHER, and dGENE.

Authors:  K Lange; D Weeks; M Boehnke
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data.

Authors:  R C Elston; J Stewart
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  A deductive method of haplotype analysis in pedigrees.

Authors:  E M Wijsman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Sequential imputation and multipoint linkage analysis.

Authors:  A Kong; N Cox; M Frigge; M Irwin
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Monte Carlo analysis on a large pedigree.

Authors:  E A Thompson; S Lin; A B Olshen; E M Wijsman
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Limits of resolution of genetic linkage studies: implications for the positional cloning of human disease genes.

Authors:  M Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Evidence for a novel late-onset Alzheimer disease locus on chromosome 19p13.2.

Authors:  Ellen M Wijsman; E Warwick Daw; Change-En Yu; Haydeh Payami; Ellen J Steinbart; David Nochlin; Erin M Conlon; Thomas D Bird; Gerard D Schellenberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans.

Authors:  E S Lander; P Green
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  43 in total

1.  Estimation and visualization of identity-by-descent within pedigrees simplifies interpretation of complex trait analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Marchani; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  Computationally efficient multipoint linkage analysis on extended pedigrees for trait models with two contributing major Loci.

Authors:  Ming Su; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Modifier locus of the skeletal muscle involvement in Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  B Granger; L Gueneau; V Drouin-Garraud; V Pedergnana; F Gagnon; R Ben Yaou; S Tezenas du Montcel; G Bonne
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  PBAP: a pipeline for file processing and quality control of pedigree data with dense genetic markers.

Authors:  Alejandro Q Nato; Nicola H Chapman; Harkirat K Sohi; Hiep D Nguyen; Zoran Brkanac; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  The advantages of dense marker sets for linkage analysis with very large families.

Authors:  Russell Thomson; Stephen Quinn; James McKay; Jeremy Silver; Melanie Bahlo; Liesel FitzGerald; Simon Foote; Jo Dickinson; Jim Stankovich
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Shared genomic segment analysis. Mapping disease predisposition genes in extended pedigrees using SNP genotype assays.

Authors:  A Thomas; N J Camp; J M Farnham; K Allen-Brady; L A Cannon-Albright
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.670

7.  Multilocus lod scores in large pedigrees: combination of exact and approximate calculations.

Authors:  Liping Tong; Elizabeth Thompson
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 0.444

8.  Multipoint approximations of identity-by-descent probabilities for accurate linkage analysis of distantly related individuals.

Authors:  Cornelis A Albers; Jim Stankovich; Russell Thomson; Melanie Bahlo; Hilbert J Kappen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Comparing population structure as inferred from genealogical versus genetic information.

Authors:  Vincenza Colonna; Teresa Nutile; Ronald R Ferrucci; Giulio Fardella; Mario Aversano; Guido Barbujani; Marina Ciullo
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Eating disorder predisposition is associated with ESRRA and HDAC4 mutations.

Authors:  Huxing Cui; Jarrette Moore; Sunbola S Ashimi; Brittany L Mason; Jordan N Drawbridge; Shizhong Han; Benjamin Hing; Abigail Matthews; Carrie J McAdams; Benjamin W Darbro; Andrew A Pieper; David A Waller; Chao Xing; Michael Lutter
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.