Literature DB >> 21729670

Prevalence and prognostic role of triple-negative breast cancer by race: a surveillance study.

Helen Swede1, David I Gregorio, Susan H Tannenbaum, Jessica A Brockmeyer, Christine Ambrosone, Lori L Wilson, Mellisa A Pensa, Lou Gonsalves, Richard G Stevens, Carolyn D Runowicz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Emerging research suggests a substantially greater prevalence of the adverse triple-negative (TN) subtype (human epidermal growth factor receptor [HER]2(-), estrogen receptor [ER](-), and progesterone receptor [PR])(-)) among black patients with breast cancer. No reports however have been generated from a statewide cancer registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study consisted of all black patients (N = 643) and a random sample of white patients (n = 719) diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer (2000-2003) listed in the National Cancer Institute-Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (NCI-SEER) Connecticut Tumor Registry (CTR). HER2 status was obtained from pathology reports submitted to the registry. Remaining data were obtained from the registry database.
RESULTS: TN tumors were more prevalent in black compared with white patients (30.8% vs. 11.2%, respectively; P < .001.) There was a 2-fold greater frequency of ER(-) and PR(-) phenotypes among black patients, but HER2 status did not differ by race. Patients with lobular cancer were less likely to have TN breast cancer compared with patients with ductal tumors (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.58). Among patients with regional disease, black patients exhibited increased risk of death (relative risk [RR] = 2.71; 95% CI, 1.48-4.97) independent of TN status. No survival disparity was found among patients with local disease. DISCUSSION: These registry-based data corroborate reports that TN breast cancer varies substantially by race and histologic subtype. A survival disparity among patients with advanced disease, but not local disease, casts some doubt on TN status as an explanation for differences.
CONCLUSION: More research is warranted to understand why black patients with advanced breast cancer may be at increased risk for death whether or not their tumors express the TN phenotype.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21729670      PMCID: PMC4459583          DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2011.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  44 in total

1.  HER2 amplification ratios by fluorescence in situ hybridization and correlation with immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 6556 breast cancer tissues.

Authors:  Marilyn A Owens; Bruce C Horten; Moacyr M Da Silva
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Differential expression of HER-2/NEU receptor of invasive mammary carcinoma between Caucasian and African American patients in the Detroit metropolitan area. Correlation with overall survival and other prognostic factors.

Authors:  M A Al-Abbadi; T A Washington; H A Saleh; S E Tekyi-Mensah; D R Lucas; C A Briston
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Feasibility study for collection of HER2 data by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program central cancer registries.

Authors:  Marsha E Reichman; Sean Altekruse; Christopher I Li; Vivien W Chen; Dennis Deapen; Mary Potts; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Donna Morrell; Jennifer Hafterson; Amanda I Phipps; Linda C Harlan; Lynn G Ries; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  B A Gusterson; R D Gelber; A Goldhirsch; K N Price; J Säve-Söderborgh; R Anbazhagan; J Styles; C M Rudenstam; R Golouh; R Reed
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Population differences in breast cancer: survey in indigenous African women reveals over-representation of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Dezheng Huo; Francis Ikpatt; Andrey Khramtsov; Jean-Marie Dangou; Rita Nanda; James Dignam; Bifeng Zhang; Tatyana Grushko; Chunling Zhang; Olayiwola Oluwasola; David Malaka; Sani Malami; Abayomi Odetunde; Adewumi O Adeoye; Festus Iyare; Adeyinka Falusi; Charles M Perou; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Triple-negative breast cancer: risk factors to potential targets.

Authors:  Bryan P Schneider; Eric P Winer; William D Foulkes; Judy Garber; Charles M Perou; Andrea Richardson; George W Sledge; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Patterns of HER2 testing in the management of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Mellisa Pensa; Helen Swede; Jessica A Brockmeyer; David I Gregorio
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 9.  Breast lesions in black women.

Authors:  J Kovi; S Mohla; H J Norris; C C Sampson; M Y Heshmat
Journal:  Pathol Annu       Date:  1989

10.  Challenges in studying the etiology of breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Melissa A Troester; Theresa Swift-Scanlan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  7 in total

1.  Looking to the future: incorporating genomic information into disparities research to reduce measurement error and selection bias.

Authors:  Alexandra E Shields; William H Crown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Mortality risk from comorbidities independent of triple-negative breast cancer status: NCI-SEER-based cohort analysis.

Authors:  Helen Swede; Amna Sarwar; Anil Magge; Dejana Braithwaite; Linda S Cook; David I Gregorio; Beth A Jones; Jessica R Hoag; Lou Gonsalves; Andrew L Salner; Kristen Zarfos; Biree Andemariam; Richard G Stevens; Alicia G Dugan; Mellisa Pensa; Jessica A Brockmeyer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 3.  Triple-negative breast cancer: new perspectives for novel therapies.

Authors:  Yashin A Mahamodhossen; Wei Liu; Zhou Rong-Rong
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Triple negative breast cancer in North of Morocco: clinicopathologic and prognostic features.

Authors:  Touria Derkaoui; Joaira Bakkach; Mohamed Mansouri; Ali Loudiyi; Mohamed Fihri; Fatima Zahra Alaoui; Amina Barakat; Bouchra El Yemlahi; Hassan Bihri; Naima Ghailani Nourouti; Mohcine Bennani Mechita
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Epidemiology of breast cancer: retrospective study in the Central African Republic.

Authors:  Augustin Balekouzou; Ping Yin; Christian Maucler Pamatika; Ghose Bishwajit; Sylvain Wilfrid Nambei; Marceline Djeintote; Barbara Esther Ouansaba; Chang Shu; Minghui Yin; Zhen Fu; Tingting Qing; Mingming Yan; Yuanli Chen; Hongyu Li; Zhongyu Xu; Boniface Koffi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Androgen Receptor Expression in Thai Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Suthat Chottanapund; M B M Van Duursen; Kumpol Ratchaworapong; Panida Navasumrit; Mathuros Ruchirawat; Martin Van den Berg
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-14

7.  Inhibitory effects of BMP9 on breast cancer cells by regulating their interaction with pre-adipocytes/adipocytes.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Zhihui Zhang; Ke Wang; Jinshu Wang; Yayun Jiang; Jing Xia; Liyao Gou; Mengyao Liu; Lan Zhou; Tongchuan He; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.