Literature DB >> 19679057

Patterns of HER2 testing in the management of primary breast cancer.

Mellisa Pensa1, Helen Swede, Jessica A Brockmeyer, David I Gregorio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with invasive breast cancer should be tested for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status at the time of diagnosis. To date, no population-based patterns of use studies have examined demographic and clinicopathologic factors associated with decisions by clinicians to test patients.
METHODS: We reviewed summary pathology reports submitted to the Connecticut Tumor Registry for all Black/African American (B/AA) women (n=644) and a 7% random sample (n=720) of White women diagnosed in 2000-2003 with primary invasive breast carcinoma. Receipt of a HER2 test (yes vs. no) was examined in relation to patient race, age, socioeconomic status, year of diagnosis, estrogen receptor (ER) status, tumor grade, lymph node status, size and stage at diagnosis.
RESULTS: A greater proportion of tumors from B/AA patients were tested compared to those of White women (69.5% vs. 61.9%, p<0.05). Tumors of patients under the age of 60 were 1.50-times more likely than older women to have been tested, and B/AA women were 1.40-times more likely than White patients to be tested. HER2 testing was more likely to be observed when information also was reported about ER status (OR=15.9, p<0.001), tumor grade (OR=2.28, p<0.05), tumor size (OR=2.16, p<0.05), and lymph node status (OR=2.06, p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Variation in which breast cancer patients received HER2 testing appears to reflect expectations about a woman's prognosis. Discrepancies in receipt of testing deserve further study as current guidelines call for all tumors to be assessed in order to adequately characterize prognosis and determine eligibility for HER2-targeted therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19679057     DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2009.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  6 in total

1.  Prevalence and prognostic role of triple-negative breast cancer by race: a surveillance study.

Authors:  Helen Swede; David I Gregorio; Susan H Tannenbaum; Jessica A Brockmeyer; Christine Ambrosone; Lori L Wilson; Mellisa A Pensa; Lou Gonsalves; Richard G Stevens; Carolyn D Runowicz
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Clinicopathological factors associated to HER-2 status in a hospital-based sample of breast cancer patients in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Ana P Ortiz; Orquídea Frías; Carmen González-Keelan; Erick Suárez; David Capó; Javier Pérez; Fernando Cabanillas; Edna Mora
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.705

3.  Sociodemographic disparities in molecular testing for breast cancer.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Radhika Ranganathan; Swann Arp Adams; Oluwole A Babatunde
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts prognosis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving targeted therapy.

Authors:  Gui-Ming Zhang; Yao Zhu; Wei-Jie Gu; Hai-Liang Zhang; Guo-Hai Shi; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Mortality risk from comorbidities independent of triple-negative breast cancer status: NCI-SEER-based cohort analysis.

Authors:  Helen Swede; Amna Sarwar; Anil Magge; Dejana Braithwaite; Linda S Cook; David I Gregorio; Beth A Jones; Jessica R Hoag; Lou Gonsalves; Andrew L Salner; Kristen Zarfos; Biree Andemariam; Richard G Stevens; Alicia G Dugan; Mellisa Pensa; Jessica A Brockmeyer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Are there socio-economic inequalities in utilization of predictive biomarker tests and biological and precision therapies for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ruth P Norris; Rosie Dew; Linda Sharp; Alastair Greystoke; Stephen Rice; Kristina Johnell; Adam Todd
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 8.775

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.