Literature DB >> 20056633

Feasibility study for collection of HER2 data by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program central cancer registries.

Marsha E Reichman1, Sean Altekruse, Christopher I Li, Vivien W Chen, Dennis Deapen, Mary Potts, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Donna Morrell, Jennifer Hafterson, Amanda I Phipps, Linda C Harlan, Lynn G Ries, Brenda K Edwards.   

Abstract

The clinical importance of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) in breast cancer is now clearly established, given that expression of this tumor marker is used to guide therapy and as a prognostic indicator. Despite its now routine evaluation in breast cancer patients, population-based data are lacking because information on HER2 status is not routinely collected in the majority of population-based cancer registries. We assessed the feasibility of collecting HER2 data and its completeness in three registries in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program. Among a sample of invasive first primary breast cancer patients diagnosed between June and December 2007, HER2 tests had been done on 96.5% (n = 522), and test results were available for 95.2% (n = 515) of patients. The majority of HER2 tests were performed by immunohistochemistry alone (50.9%), 35.3% by both immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and 11.8% of tests by FISH alone. As a result of these findings, SEER registries will collect HER2 data on all invasive breast cancer patients as an optional data element for those diagnosed in 2009 and HER2 will likely be a required data element for these patients in 2010.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20056633      PMCID: PMC2805457          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  8 in total

1.  neu/erbB-2 amplification identifies a poor-prognosis group of women with node-negative breast cancer. Toronto Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  I L Andrulis; S B Bull; M E Blackstein; D Sutherland; C Mak; S Sidlofsky; K P Pritzker; R W Hartwick; W Hanna; L Lickley; R Wilkinson; A Qizilbash; U Ambus; M Lipa; H Weizel; A Katz; M Baida; S Mariz; G Stoik; P Dacamara; D Strongitharm; W Geddie; D McCready
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Amplification of the HER2 gene in breast cancers testing 2+ weak positive by HercepTest immunohistochemistry: false-positive or false-negative immunohistochemistry?

Authors:  Ciara Barrett; Hilary Magee; Denise O'Toole; Sinead Daly; Michael Jeffers
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Diagnostic evaluation of HER-2 as a molecular target: an assessment of accuracy and reproducibility of laboratory testing in large, prospective, randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael F Press; Guido Sauter; Leslie Bernstein; Ivonne E Villalobos; Martina Mirlacher; Jian-Yuan Zhou; Rooba Wardeh; Yong-Tian Li; Roberta Guzman; Yanling Ma; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Angela Santiago; Jinha M Park; Alessandro Riva; Dennis J Slamon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry.

Authors:  Katrina R Bauer; Monica Brown; Rosemary D Cress; Carol A Parise; Vincent Caggiano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Real-world performance of HER2 testing--National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; John Bryant; Elizabeth Tan-Chiu; Edward Romond; William Hiller; Kyeongmee Park; Ann Brown; Greg Yothers; Steve Anderson; Roy Smith; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  HER2 and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kathleen I Pritchard; Lois E Shepherd; Frances P O'Malley; Irene L Andrulis; Dongsheng Tu; Vivien H Bramwell; Mark N Levine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The role of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in the survival of women with estrogen and progesterone receptor-negative, invasive breast cancer: the California Cancer Registry, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Monica Brown; Alex Tsodikov; Katrina R Bauer; Carol A Parise; Vincent Caggiano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

  8 in total
  21 in total

Review 1.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the impact of obesity on breast cancer risk and survival: a global perspective.

Authors:  Elisa V Bandera; Gertraud Maskarinec; Isabelle Romieu; Esther M John
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Five-year risk of interval-invasive second breast cancer.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Diana S M Buist; Nehmat Houssami; Emily C Dowling; Elkan F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle; Constance D Lehman; Louise M Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Prevalence and prognostic role of triple-negative breast cancer by race: a surveillance study.

Authors:  Helen Swede; David I Gregorio; Susan H Tannenbaum; Jessica A Brockmeyer; Christine Ambrosone; Lori L Wilson; Mellisa A Pensa; Lou Gonsalves; Richard G Stevens; Carolyn D Runowicz
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Diabetes and differences in detection of incident invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Gregory S Calip; Onchee Yu; Denise M Boudreau; Huibo Shao; Ruth Oratz; Stephen B Richardson; Heather T Gold
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Frailty and skeletal muscle in older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Grant R Williams; Allison M Deal; Hyman B Muss; Marc S Weinberg; Hanna K Sanoff; Emily J Guerard; Kirsten A Nyrop; Mackenzi Pergolotti; Shlomit Strulov Shachar
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  Brachytherapy improves outcomes in young men (≤60 years) with prostate cancer: A SEER analysis.

Authors:  Hani Ashamalla; Adel Guirguis; Kyle McCool; Shauna McVorran; Malcolm Mattes; Daniel Metzger; Clara Oromendia; Karla V Ballman; Bahaa Mokhtar; Mounzer Tchelebi; Evangelia Katsoulakis; Sameer Rafla
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Epidemiology of triple negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Aileen Burke; William F Anderson
Journal:  Breast Dis       Date:  2010

8.  The effect of time on racial differences in epithelial ovarian cancer (OVCA) diagnosis stage, overall and by histologic subtypes: a study of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Anna B Beckmeyer-Borowko; Caryn E Peterson; Katherine C Brewer; Mary A Otoo; Faith G Davis; Kent F Hoskins; Charlotte E Joslin
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  New diagnostic markers in salivary gland tumors.

Authors:  Sven Schneider; Philipp Kloimstein; Johannes Pammer; Werner Brannath; Matthaeus Ch Grasl; Boban M Erovic
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Use of imputed population-based cancer registry data as a method of accounting for missing information: application to estrogen receptor status for breast cancer.

Authors:  Nadia Howlader; Anne-Michelle Noone; Mandi Yu; Kathleen A Cronin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.