Literature DB >> 21729062

Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.

Zenobia Lewis1, Nina Wedell, John Hunt.   

Abstract

Males and females share a genome and express many shared phenotypic traits, which are often selected in opposite directions. This generates intralocus sexual conflict that may constrain trait evolution by preventing the sexes from reaching their optimal phenotype. Furthermore, if present across multiple loci, intralocus sexual conflict can result in a gender load that may diminish the benefits of sexual selection and help maintain genetic variation for fitness. Despite the importance of intralocus sexual conflict, surprisingly few empirical studies conclusively demonstrate its operation. We show that the pattern of multivariate selection acting on three sexually dimorphic life-history traits (development time, body size, and longevity) in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella, is opposing for the sexes. Moreover, we combined our estimates of selection with the additive genetic variance-covariance matrix (G) to predict the evolutionary response of the life-history traits in the sexes and showed that the angle between the vector of responses and the vector of sexually antagonistic selection was almost orthogonal at 84.70°. Thus, G biases the predicted response of life-history traits in the sexes away from the direction of sexually antagonistic selection, confirming the presence of strong intralocus sexual conflict in this species. Despite this, sexual dimorphism has evolved in all of the life-history traits examined suggesting that mechanism(s) have evolved to resolve this conflict and allow the sexes to reach their life-history optima. We argue that intralocus sexual conflict is likely to play an important role in the evolution of divergent life-history strategies between the sexes in this species.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21729062     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01267.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  35 in total

1.  Evolutionary inevitability of sexual antagonism.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Quantifying maladaptation during the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Genevieve Matthews; Sandra Hangartner; David G Chapple; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Release from intralocus sexual conflict? Evolved loss of a male sexual trait demasculinizes female gene expression.

Authors:  Jack G Rayner; Sonia Pascoal; Nathan W Bailey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Sexual conflict, life span, and aging.

Authors:  Margo I Adler; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  Sperm morph and remating frequency in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.

Authors:  Doko-Miles J Thorburn; Robert J Knell; Jonathan M Parrett
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Sexually antagonistic selection promotes genetic divergence between males and females in an ant.

Authors:  Pierre-André Eyer; Alexander J Blumenfeld; Edward L Vargo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Phenotypic plasticity and integration in the mangrove rivulus (Kryptolebias marmoratus): a prospectus.

Authors:  Ryan L Earley; Amanda F Hanninen; Adam Fuller; Mark J Garcia; Elizabeth A Lee
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.326

9.  Constraints on the coevolution of contemporary human males and females.

Authors:  Stephen C Stearns; Diddahally R Govindaraju; Douglas Ewbank; Sean G Byars
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Sexes suffer from suboptimal lifespan because of genetic conflict in a seed beetle.

Authors:  Elena C Berg; Alexei A Maklakov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.