Literature DB >> 21729055

Avian vision and the evolution of egg color mimicry in the common cuckoo.

Mary Caswell Stoddard1, Martin Stevens.   

Abstract

Coevolutionary arms races are a potent force in evolution, and brood parasite-host dynamics provide classical examples. Different host-races of the common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, lay eggs in the nests of other species, leaving all parental care to hosts. Cuckoo eggs often (but not always) appear to match remarkably the color and pattern of host eggs, thus reducing detection by hosts. However, most studies of egg mimicry focus on human assessments or reflectance spectra, which fail to account for avian vision. Here, we use discrimination and tetrachromatic color space modeling of bird vision to quantify egg background and spot color mimicry in the common cuckoo and 11 of its principal hosts, and we relate this to egg rejection by different hosts. Egg background color and luminance are strongly mimicked by most cuckoo host-races, and mimicry is better when hosts show strong rejection. We introduce a novel measure of color mimicry-"color overlap"-and show that cuckoo and host background colors increasingly overlap in avian color space as hosts exhibit stronger rejection. Finally, cuckoos with better background color mimicry also have better pattern mimicry. Our findings reveal new information about egg mimicry that would be impossible to derive by the human eye.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21729055     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01262.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  35 in total

1.  Egg retrieval versus egg rejection in cuckoo hosts.

Authors:  Canchao Yang; Wei Liang; Anders P Møller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Variation in multicomponent recognition cues alters egg rejection decisions: a test of the optimal acceptance threshold hypothesis.

Authors:  Daniel Hanley; Analía V López; Vanina D Fiorini; Juan C Reboreda; Tomáš Grim; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Defences against brood parasites from a social immunity perspective.

Authors:  S C Cotter; D Pincheira-Donoso; R Thorogood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Interspecific visual signalling in animals and plants: a functional classification.

Authors:  Tim Caro; William L Allen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Colour, vision and coevolution in avian brood parasitism.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients.

Authors:  Lindsay Canniff; Miri Dainson; Analía V López; Mark E Hauber; Tomáš Grim; Peter Samaš; Daniel Hanley
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Cryptic cuckoo eggs hide from competing cuckoos.

Authors:  Ros Gloag; Laurie-Anne Keller; Naomi E Langmore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Avian egg and nestling detection in the wild: should we rely on visual models or behavioural experiments?

Authors:  Jesús M Avilés
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Signal detection and optimal acceptance thresholds in avian brood parasite-host systems: implications for egg rejection.

Authors:  Francisco Ruiz-Raya; Manuel Soler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  A shared chemical basis of avian host-parasite egg colour mimicry.

Authors:  Branislav Igic; Phillip Cassey; Tomás Grim; David R Greenwood; Csaba Moskát; Jarkko Rutila; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.