Literature DB >> 30967079

Egg retrieval versus egg rejection in cuckoo hosts.

Canchao Yang1, Wei Liang1, Anders P Møller2.   

Abstract

Before complex nests evolved, birds laid eggs on the ground, and egg retrieval evolved as an adaptation against accidental displacement of eggs outside the nest. Therefore, egg retrieval is an ancient, and likely ancestral, widespread behaviour in birds. However, it has received little attention in studies of avian brood parasitism, perhaps because most parasitism occurs in species with complex nests, a context in which egg retrieval seems irrelevant. However, for cavity-nesting hosts of avian brood parasites, egg retrieval may still play an important role in the coevolutionary interactions between obligate brood parasites and hosts, because egg retrieval can be considered to be antagonistic to egg rejection behaviour in hosts, yet both may involve cognition to recognize eggs. We hypothesized that (1) cavity-nesting hosts should retrieve misplaced eggs from outside the nest cup, (2) brood parasitism has modulated egg retrieval behaviour in cavity-nesting hosts and (3) hosts use the same visual cues for decision-making during egg recognition in both egg retrieval and egg rejection actions. To test these hypotheses, we performed a series of experiments in a cavity-nesting host, the green-backed tit ( Parus monticolus). Foreign eggs with different levels of mimicry were placed within or outside nest cups of hosts to test their responses. We found that host decisions about whether to retrieve or reject an egg both depended on the degree of mimicry. However, hosts sometimes first retrieved poorly mimetic foreign eggs and then rejected them. Alternatively, hosts sometimes failed to retrieve highly mimetic conspecific eggs. We suggest that egg retrieval in hosts is likely to be a result of the interaction between ancient retrieval behaviour and subsequent adaptation against brood parasitism. This article is part of the theme issue 'The coevolutionary biology of brood parasitism: from mechanism to pattern'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Parus monticolus; brood parasitism; cavity-nesting host; cognition mechanism; egg mimicry

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30967079      PMCID: PMC6388044          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  16 in total

Review 1.  Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.

Authors:  M E Hauber; P W Sherman
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs.

Authors:  Claire N Spottiswoode; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coots use hatch order to learn to recognize and reject conspecific brood parasitic chicks.

Authors:  Daizaburo Shizuka; Bruce E Lyon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Evolution of avian plumage color in a tetrahedral color space: a phylogenetic analysis of new world buntings.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Richard O Prum
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism.

Authors:  Bruce E Lyon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Avian vision and the evolution of egg color mimicry in the common cuckoo.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 7.  Optimization, constraint, and history in the evolution of eyes.

Authors:  T H Goldsmith
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.875

8.  Coevolution in action: disruptive selection on egg colour in an avian brood parasite and its host.

Authors:  Canchao Yang; Wei Liang; Yan Cai; Suhua Shi; Fugo Takasu; Anders P Møller; Anton Antonov; Frode Fossøy; Arne Moksnes; Eivin Røskaft; Bård G Stokke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The modelling of avian visual perception predicts behavioural rejection responses to foreign egg colours.

Authors:  Phillip Cassey; Marcel Honza; Tomas Grim; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Relationships between egg-recognition and egg-ejection in a grasp-ejector species.

Authors:  Manuel Soler; Francisco Ruiz-Raya; Gianluca Roncalli; Juan Diego Ibáñez-Álamo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Differently sized cuckoos pose different threats to hosts.

Authors:  Jiangping Yu; Mingju E; Wei Sun; Wei Liang; Haitao Wang; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.624

2.  Nest site availability and niche differentiation between two cavity-nesting birds in time and space.

Authors:  Ping Ye; Canchao Yang; Wei Liang
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Egg recognition abilities of tit species in the Paridae family: do Indomalayan tits exhibit higher recognition than Palearctic tits?

Authors:  Jian-Ping Liu; Lei Zhang; Li Zhang; Can-Chao Yang; Cheng-Te Yao; Xin Lu; Anders Pape Møller; Dong-Mei Wan; Wei Liang
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2020-11-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.