Literature DB >> 30199015

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients.

Lindsay Canniff1, Miri Dainson2, Analía V López3, Mark E Hauber2, Tomáš Grim4, Peter Samaš5, Daniel Hanley6.   

Abstract

Brood parasites lay their eggs in other females' nests, leaving the host parents to hatch and rear their young. Studying how brood parasites manipulate hosts into raising their young and how hosts detect parasitism provide important insights in the field of coevolutionary biology. Brood parasites, such as cuckoos and cowbirds, gain an evolutionary advantage because they do not have to pay the costs of rearing their own young. However, these costs select for host defenses against all developmental stages of parasites, including eggs, their young, and adults. Egg rejection experiments are the most common method used to study host defenses. During these experiments, a researcher places an experimental egg in a host nest and monitors how hosts respond. Color is often manipulated, and the expectation is that the likelihood of egg discrimination and the degree of dissimilarity between the host and experimental egg are positively related. This paper serves as a guide for conducting egg rejection experiments from describing methods for creating consistent egg colors to analyzing the findings of such experiments. Special attention is given to a new method involving uniquely colored eggs along color gradients that has the potential to explore color biases in host recognition. Without standardization, it is not possible to compare findings between studies in a meaningful way; a standard protocol within this field will allow for increasingly accurate and comparable results for further experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30199015      PMCID: PMC6231696          DOI: 10.3791/57512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  37 in total

Review 1.  The visual ecology of avian photoreceptors.

Authors:  N S Hart
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Evolution of bird eggs in the absence of cuckoo parasitism.

Authors:  David C Lahti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Experimental reduction of ultraviolet wavelengths reflected from parasitic eggs affects rejection behaviour in the blackcap Sylvia atricapilla.

Authors:  Marcel Honza; Lenka Polaciková
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Experimental shift in hosts' acceptance threshold of inaccurate-mimic brood parasite eggs.

Authors:  Márk E Hauber; Csaba Moskát; Miklós Bán
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Arms races between and within species.

Authors:  R Dawkins; J R Krebs
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

6.  Avian vision and the evolution of egg color mimicry in the common cuckoo.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Coevolution in action: disruptive selection on egg colour in an avian brood parasite and its host.

Authors:  Canchao Yang; Wei Liang; Yan Cai; Suhua Shi; Fugo Takasu; Anders P Møller; Anton Antonov; Frode Fossøy; Arne Moksnes; Eivin Røskaft; Bård G Stokke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The modelling of avian visual perception predicts behavioural rejection responses to foreign egg colours.

Authors:  Phillip Cassey; Marcel Honza; Tomas Grim; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Who moved my eggs? An experimental test of the egg arrangement hypothesis for the rejection of brood parasitic eggs.

Authors:  Daniel Hanley; Peter Samaš; Mark E Hauber; Tomáš Grim
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Paul C D Johnson; Holger Schielzeth
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.118

View more
  2 in total

1.  Variation in multicomponent recognition cues alters egg rejection decisions: a test of the optimal acceptance threshold hypothesis.

Authors:  Daniel Hanley; Analía V López; Vanina D Fiorini; Juan C Reboreda; Tomáš Grim; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  CamoEvo: An open access toolbox for artificial camouflage evolution experiments.

Authors:  George R A Hancock; Jolyon Troscianko
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.171

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.