Literature DB >> 21725257

Stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel baha implant system: six-month data from a multicenter clinical investigation.

Catharina A J Dun1, Maarten J F de Wolf, Myrthe K S Hol, Stina Wigren, Mans Eeg-Olofsson, Kevin Green, Anneli Karlsmo, Mark C Flynn, Joacim Stalfors, Mike Rothera, Emmanuel A M Mylanus, Cor W R J Cremers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determination of the difference in implant stability between a novel Baha implant system (test) and the previous-generation implant system (control).
METHODS: In an open, randomized, prospective multicenter clinical investigation, 77 adult patients with Baha implants were included. Test and control implants were randomly assigned in proportions of 2:1. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were recorded using resonance frequency analysis at the time of implantation and at 10 days, at 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks, and at 6 months after surgery. Skin reactions were evaluated according to the Holgers classification. Sound processor fitting was performed from 6 weeks after implantation.
RESULTS: Significantly higher mean ISQ values, measured between 0 and 6 months, were obtained for test compared to control implants (70.4 versus 65.4, p < 0.0001). Statistically significant differences were obtained for the study population as a whole and for the subgroup of patients loaded at 6 ± 1 weeks after implant surgery (63.6% of patients). Up to 12 weeks, Holgers rates were comparable, whereas at 6 months, more skin reactions (Grades 1 and 2) were observed in the control implant group. No reduction in mean ISQ values was observed after implant loading.
CONCLUSION: The test implant showed higher mean ISQ values at the time of placement and over time. The level of osseointegration reached with the implants in adults as early as 6 weeks after implantation was sufficient to support the sound processor. The test implant system is expected to provide additional benefits related to the improvement of the degree of osseointegration, especially for patients with thin or compromised bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21725257     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182267e9c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  17 in total

1.  Wide diameter bone-anchored hearing system implants: a comparison of long-term follow-up data between tissue reduction and tissue preservation techniques.

Authors:  Martin Reznitsky; Kirsten Wielandt; Søren Foghsgaard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A novel vacuum assisted closure therapy model for use with percutaneous devices.

Authors:  Saranne J Cook; Francesca R Nichols; Lucille B Brunker; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Bone anchored hearing implants without skin thinning: the Gruppo Otologico surgical and audiological experience.

Authors:  Antonio Caruso; Anna Lisa Giannuzzi; Valerio Sozzi; Mario Sanna
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Percutaneous titanium implants for bone conduction hearing aids: experience with 283 cases].

Authors:  P A Federspil; A Koch; M H Schneider; K Zaoui
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Baha implant as a hearing solution for single-sided deafness after retrosigmoid approach for the vestibular schwannoma: surgical results.

Authors:  Jan Boucek; Jan Vokral; Libor Cerny; Martin Chovanec; Jiří Skrivan; Eduard Zverina; Jan Betka; Michal Zabrodsky
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  A new bone-anchored hearing implant: short-term retrospective data on implant survival and subjective benefit.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Henricus P M Kunst; Ronald J E Pennings; Ad F M Snik; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Soft tissue reactions in patients with bone anchored hearing aids.

Authors:  J Rebol
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  A new wide-diameter bone-anchored hearing implant-prospective 1-year data on complications, implant stability, and survival.

Authors:  Søren Foghsgaard; Per Caye-Thomasen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review.

Authors:  Sabine Reinfeldt; Bo Håkansson; Hamidreza Taghavi; Måns Eeg-Olofsson
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-01-16

10.  Stability Testing of a Wide Bone-Anchored Device after Surgery without Skin Thinning.

Authors:  Malou Hultcrantz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.