Literature DB >> 21724502

A statistical modeling approach to the analysis of spatial patterns of FDG-PET uptake in human sarcoma.

F O'Sullivan1, E Wolsztynski, J O'Sullivan, T Richards, E U Conrad, J F Eary.   

Abstract

Clinical experience with positron emission tomography (PET) scanning of sarcoma, using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), has established spatial heterogeneity in the standardized uptake values within the tumor mass as a key prognostic indicator of patient survival. But it may be that a more detailed quantitation of the tumor FDG uptake pattern could provide additional insights into risk. The present work develops a statistical model for this purpose. The approach is based on a tubular representation of the tumor mass with a simplified radial analysis of uptake, transverse to the tubular axis. The technique provides novel ways of characterizing the overall profile of the tumor, including the introduction of an approach for the measurement of its phase of development. The phase measure can distinguish between early phase tumors, in which the uptake is highest at the core, and later stage masses, in which there can often be central voids in FDG uptake. Biologically, these voids arise from necrosis and fluid, fat or cartilage accumulations. The tumor profiling technique is implemented using open-source software tools and illustrations are provided with clinically representative scans. A series of FDG-PET studies from 185 patients is used to formally evaluate the prognostic benefit. Significant improvements in the prediction of patient survival and progression are obtained from the tumor profiling analysis. After adjustment for other factors including heterogeneity, a typical one standard deviation increase in phase (as determined by the analysis) is associated with close to 20% more risk of progression or death. The work confirms that more detailed quantitative assessments of the spatial pattern of PET imaging data of tumor masses, beyond the maximum FDG uptake (SUV(max)) and previously considered measures of heterogeneity, provide improved prognostic information for potential input to treatment decisions for future patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21724502      PMCID: PMC4753574          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2160984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  10 in total

1.  AMIDE: a free software tool for multimodality medical image analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Markus Loening; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.488

2.  Vessel boundary tracking for intravital microscopy via multiscale gradient vector flow snakes.

Authors:  Jinshan Tang; Scott T Acton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Vessel Boundary Detection for its 3D Reconstruction by Using a Deformable Model (GVF Snake).

Authors:  H Kim; C Ahn; G Jeong; H Kim; M Kim; K Sun
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2005

4.  Quantitative [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in pretreatment and grading of sarcoma.

Authors:  J F Eary; E U Conrad; J D Bruckner; A Folpe; K J Hunt; D A Mankoff; A T Howlett
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  The integration of quantitative multi-modality imaging data into mathematical models of tumors.

Authors:  Nkiruka C Atuegwu; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Current trends in mathematical modeling of tumor-microenvironment interactions: a survey of tools and applications.

Authors:  Katarzyna A Rejniak; Lisa J McCawley
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2010-04

7.  Predictions of tumour morphological stability and evaluation against experimental observations.

Authors:  Kara Pham; Hermann B Frieboes; Vittorio Cristini; John Lowengrub
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Spatial heterogeneity in sarcoma 18F-FDG uptake as a predictor of patient outcome.

Authors:  Janet F Eary; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Janet O'Sullivan; Ernest U Conrad
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  A statistical measure of tissue heterogeneity with application to 3D PET sarcoma data.

Authors:  Finbarr O'Sullivan; Supratik Roy; Janet Eary
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.899

10.  Sarcoma tumor FDG uptake measured by PET and patient outcome: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Janet F Eary; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Yudi Powitan; Kingshuk Roy Chandhury; Cheryl Vernon; James D Bruckner; Ernest U Conrad
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 9.236

  10 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Rhabdomyosarcoma in adults: new perspectives on therapy.

Authors:  Catalina Ruiz-Mesa; John M Goldberg; Alvaro J Coronado Munoz; Sarah N Dumont; Jonathan C Trent
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-06

Review 2.  Towards enhanced PET quantification in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Nicolas Karakatsanis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Recent Trends in PET Image Interpretations Using Volumetric and Texture-based Quantification Methods in Nuclear Oncology.

Authors:  Muhammad Kashif Rahim; Sung Eun Kim; Hyeongryul So; Hyung Jun Kim; Gi Jeong Cheon; Eun Seong Lee; Keon Wook Kang; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-01-22

4.  Robustness of intratumour ¹⁸F-FDG PET uptake heterogeneity quantification for therapy response prediction in oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Florent Tixier; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; Olivier Pradier; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Statistical assessment of treatment response in a cancer patient based on pre-therapy and post-therapy FDG-PET scans.

Authors:  E Wolsztynski; F O'Sullivan; J O'Sullivan; J F Eary
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Spatially coherent modeling of 3D FDG-PET data for assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity and uptake gradients.

Authors:  Eric Wolsztynski; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Janet F Eary
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-07-29

Review 7.  Tumor quantification in clinical positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Bing Bai; James Bading; Peter S Conti
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 8.  Quantification of heterogeneity as a biomarker in tumor imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lejla Alic; Wiro J Niessen; Jifke F Veenland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prognostic value of FDG-PET indices for the assessment of histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcome in pediatric patients with Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Clement Bailly; Rodolphe Leforestier; Loic Campion; Estelle Thebaud; Anne Moreau; Francoise Kraeber-Bodere; Thomas Carlier; Caroline Bodet-Milin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  FDG uptake heterogeneity in FIGO IIb cervical carcinoma does not predict pelvic lymph node involvement.

Authors:  Frank J Brooks; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.