Literature DB >> 27990685

Statistical assessment of treatment response in a cancer patient based on pre-therapy and post-therapy FDG-PET scans.

E Wolsztynski1, F O'Sullivan1, J O'Sullivan1, J F Eary2.   

Abstract

This work arises from consideration of sarcoma patients in which fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging pre-therapy and post-chemotherapy is used to assess treatment response. Our focus is on methods for evaluation of the statistical uncertainty in the measured response for an individual patient. The gamma distribution is often used to describe data with constant coefficient of variation, but it can be adapted to describe the pseudo-Poisson character of PET measurements. We propose co-registering the pre-therapy and post- therapy images and modeling the approximately paired voxel-level data using the gamma statistics. Expressions for the estimation of the treatment effect and its variability are provided. Simulation studies explore the performance in the context of testing for a treatment effect. The impact of misregistration errors and how test power is affected by estimation of variability using simplified sampling assumptions, as might be produced by direct bootstrapping, is also clarified. The results illustrate a marked benefit in using a properly constructed paired approach. Remarkably, the power of the paired analysis is maintained even if the pre-image and post- image data are poorly registered. A theoretical explanation for this is indicated. The methodology is further illustrated in the context of a series of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET sarcoma patient studies. These data demonstrate the additional prognostic value of the proposed treatment effect test statistic.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gamma distribution; paired analysis; patient-adaptive treatment; percentage change in mean; therapeutic effectiveness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27990685      PMCID: PMC5334348          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  40 in total

1.  Positron emission tomography: imaging tumor response.

Authors:  J F Eary; K A Krohn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-12

2.  A statistical modeling approach to the analysis of spatial patterns of FDG-PET uptake in human sarcoma.

Authors:  F O'Sullivan; E Wolsztynski; J O'Sullivan; T Richards; E U Conrad; J F Eary
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Impact of the definition of peak standardized uptake value on quantification of treatment response.

Authors:  Matt Vanderhoek; Scott B Perlman; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma using dual-phase (18)F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Byung Hyun Byun; Sung Hoon Kim; Sang Moo Lim; Ilhan Lim; Chang-Bae Kong; Won Seok Song; Wan Hyeong Cho; Dae-Geun Jeon; Soo-Yong Lee; Jae-Soo Koh; Soo Kyo Chung
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Analysis of overdispersed count data: application to the Human Papillomavirus Infection in Men (HIM) Study.

Authors:  J-H Lee; G Han; W J Fulp; A R Giuliano
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 2.451

6.  18F-FDG PET uptake characterization through texture analysis: investigating the complementary nature of heterogeneity and functional tumor volume in a multi-cancer site patient cohort.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Mohamed Majdoub; Martin Vallières; Florent Tixier; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; David Groheux; Elif Hindié; Antoine Martineau; Olivier Pradier; Roland Hustinx; Remy Perdrisot; Remy Guillevin; Issam El Naqa; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Use of positron emission tomography in localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Scott M Schuetze; Brian P Rubin; Cheryl Vernon; Douglas S Hawkins; James D Bruckner; Ernest U Conrad; Janet F Eary
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging. The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis.

Authors:  Steven M. Larson; Yusuf Erdi; Timothy Akhurst; Madhu Mazumdar; Homer A. Macapinlac; Ronald D. Finn; Cecille Casilla; Melissa Fazzari; Neil Srivastava; Henry W.D. Yeung; John L. Humm; Jose Guillem; Robert Downey; Martin Karpeh; Alfred E. Cohen; Robert Ginsberg
Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging       Date:  1999-05

9.  Spatial heterogeneity in sarcoma 18F-FDG uptake as a predictor of patient outcome.

Authors:  Janet F Eary; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Janet O'Sullivan; Ernest U Conrad
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  FDG-PET Response Prediction in Pediatric Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Impact of Metabolically Defined Tumor Volumes and Individualized SUV Measurements on the Positive Predictive Value.

Authors:  Amr Elsayed M Hussien; Christian Furth; Stefan Schönberger; Patrick Hundsdoerfer; Ingo G Steffen; Holger Amthauer; Hans-Wilhelm Müller; Hubertus Hautzel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.639

View more
  4 in total

1.  Efficient Bandwidth Estimation in 2D Filtered Backprojection Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ranjan Maitra
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 10.856

2.  Dose-Distribution-Driven PET Image-Based Outcome Prediction (DDD-PIOP): A Deep Learning Study for Oropharyngeal Cancer IMRT Application.

Authors:  Chunhao Wang; Chenyang Liu; Yushi Chang; Kyle Lafata; Yunfeng Cui; Jiahan Zhang; Yang Sheng; Yvonne Mowery; David Brizel; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Allosteric inhibitor remotely modulates the conformation of the orthestric pockets in mutant IDH2/R140Q.

Authors:  Jiao Chen; Jie Yang; Xianqiang Sun; Zhongming Wang; Xiaolan Cheng; Wuguang Lu; Xueting Cai; Chunping Hu; Xu Shen; Peng Cao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Sample size calculations based on a difference in medians for positively skewed outcomes in health care studies.

Authors:  Aidan G O'Keeffe; Gareth Ambler; Julie A Barber
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 4.615

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.