Eric Wolsztynski1,2, Finbarr O'Sullivan1,2, Janet F Eary3. 1. University College Cork, Statistics Department, Cork, Ireland. 2. Insight SFI Research Centre for Data Analytics, Cork, Ireland. 3. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: Radiomics have become invaluable for non-invasive cancer patient risk prediction, and the community now turns to exogenous assessment, e.g., from genomics, for interpretability of these agnostic analyses. Yet, some opportunities for clinically interpretable modeling of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging data remain unexplored, that could facilitate insightful characterization at voxel level. Approach: Here, we present a novel deformable tubular representation of the distribution of tracer uptake within a volume of interest, and derive interpretable prognostic summaries from it. This data-adaptive strategy yields a 3D-coherent and smooth model fit, and a profile curve describing tracer uptake as a function of voxel location within the volume. Local trends in uptake rates are assessed at each voxel via the calculation of gradients derived from this curve. Intratumoral heterogeneity can also be assessed directly from it. Results: We illustrate the added value of this approach over previous strategies, in terms of volume rendering and coherence of the structural representation of the data. We further demonstrate consistency of the implementation via simulations, and prognostic potential of heterogeneity and statistical summaries of the uptake gradients derived from the model on a clinical cohort of 158 sarcoma patients imaged with F 18 -fluorodeoxyglucose-PET, in multivariate prognostic models of patient survival. Conclusions: The proposed approach captures uptake characteristics consistently at any location, and yields a description of variations in uptake that holds prognostic value complementarily to structural heterogeneity. This creates opportunities for monitoring of local areas of greater interest within a tumor, e.g., to assess therapeutic response in avid locations.
Purpose: Radiomics have become invaluable for non-invasive cancer patient risk prediction, and the community now turns to exogenous assessment, e.g., from genomics, for interpretability of these agnostic analyses. Yet, some opportunities for clinically interpretable modeling of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging data remain unexplored, that could facilitate insightful characterization at voxel level. Approach: Here, we present a novel deformable tubular representation of the distribution of tracer uptake within a volume of interest, and derive interpretable prognostic summaries from it. This data-adaptive strategy yields a 3D-coherent and smooth model fit, and a profile curve describing tracer uptake as a function of voxel location within the volume. Local trends in uptake rates are assessed at each voxel via the calculation of gradients derived from this curve. Intratumoral heterogeneity can also be assessed directly from it. Results: We illustrate the added value of this approach over previous strategies, in terms of volume rendering and coherence of the structural representation of the data. We further demonstrate consistency of the implementation via simulations, and prognostic potential of heterogeneity and statistical summaries of the uptake gradients derived from the model on a clinical cohort of 158 sarcoma patients imaged with F 18 -fluorodeoxyglucose-PET, in multivariate prognostic models of patient survival. Conclusions: The proposed approach captures uptake characteristics consistently at any location, and yields a description of variations in uptake that holds prognostic value complementarily to structural heterogeneity. This creates opportunities for monitoring of local areas of greater interest within a tumor, e.g., to assess therapeutic response in avid locations.
Authors: Katja Pinker; Fuki Shitano; Evis Sala; Richard K Do; Robert J Young; Andreas G Wibmer; Hedvig Hricak; Elizabeth J Sutton; Elizabeth A Morris Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Janet F Eary; Ernest U Conrad; Janet O'Sullivan; Douglas S Hawkins; Scott M Schuetze; Finbarr O'Sullivan Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Joo Hyun O; Brandon S Luber; Jeffrey P Leal; Hao Wang; Vanessa Bolejack; Scott M Schuetze; Lawrence H Schwartz; Lee J Helman; Denise Reinke; Laurence H Baker; Richard L Wahl Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Fergus Davnall; Connie S P Yip; Gunnar Ljungqvist; Mariyah Selmi; Francesca Ng; Bal Sanghera; Balaji Ganeshan; Kenneth A Miles; Gary J Cook; Vicky Goh Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2012-10-24
Authors: Alex Zwanenburg; Martin Vallières; Mahmoud A Abdalah; Hugo J W L Aerts; Vincent Andrearczyk; Aditya Apte; Saeed Ashrafinia; Spyridon Bakas; Roelof J Beukinga; Ronald Boellaard; Marta Bogowicz; Luca Boldrini; Irène Buvat; Gary J R Cook; Christos Davatzikos; Adrien Depeursinge; Marie-Charlotte Desseroit; Nicola Dinapoli; Cuong Viet Dinh; Sebastian Echegaray; Issam El Naqa; Andriy Y Fedorov; Roberto Gatta; Robert J Gillies; Vicky Goh; Michael Götz; Matthias Guckenberger; Sung Min Ha; Mathieu Hatt; Fabian Isensee; Philippe Lambin; Stefan Leger; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Jacopo Lenkowicz; Fiona Lippert; Are Losnegård; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Olivier Morin; Henning Müller; Sandy Napel; Christophe Nioche; Fanny Orlhac; Sarthak Pati; Elisabeth A G Pfaehler; Arman Rahmim; Arvind U K Rao; Jonas Scherer; Muhammad Musib Siddique; Nanna M Sijtsema; Jairo Socarras Fernandez; Emiliano Spezi; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Stephanie Tanadini-Lang; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost; Taman Upadhaya; Vincenzo Valentini; Lisanne V van Dijk; Joost van Griethuysen; Floris H P van Velden; Philip Whybra; Christian Richter; Steffen Löck Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 29.146