Literature DB >> 21724082

Temporomandibular joint and normal occlusion: Is there anything singular about it? A computed tomographic evaluation.

Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral1, Márcio José da Silva Campos, Andréia Fialho Rodrigues, Marcelo Reis Fraga.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the condyle-fossa relationship, the position of the condyles in their respective mandibular fossae, and the dimensional and positional symmetries between the right and left condyles in a sample with normal occlusion.
METHODS: Thirty subjects from 15 to 32 years of age with normal occlusion had computed tomography scans of their temporomandibular joints. The images obtained from the axial slices were evaluated for possible asymmetries in size and position between the condylar processes. The images obtained from the sagittal slices were used to assess the depth of the mandibular fossa, the condyle-fossa relationship, and the centralization of the condyles in their respective mandibular fossae. Paired Student t tests were applied, and Pearson product moment correlations were determined after measurements on both sides were obtained.
RESULTS: The largest mediolateral diameter of the mandibular condylar processes (P = 0.022) and the posterior joint spaces (P = 0.048) showed statistically significant differences between the right and left sides. Statistically significant (P <0.05) anterior positioning of the condyles (noncentralized position) was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: No singular characteristic in the temporomandibular joints of the normal occlusion group was verified. The largest mediolateral diameter of the mandibular condylar processes and the posterior joint spaces showed statistically significant differences between the right and left sides. Evaluation of the position of the condyles in their respective mandibular fossae showed noncentralized positioning for the right and left sides.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21724082     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  9 in total

1.  Correlation between condylar position and different sagittal skeletal facial types.

Authors:  Maryam Paknahad; Shoaleh Shahidi; Hajar Abbaszade
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Biometry of the temporomandibular joint using computerized tomography.

Authors:  Isabelle Dupuy-Bonafé; Philippe Otal; Sylvie Montal; Alain Bonafé; Igor L Maldonado
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Evaluation of condyle-fossa relationships in adolescents with various skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Jong-Moon Chae; Jae Hyun Park; Kiyoshi Tai; Kyosuke Mizutani; Satoshi Uzuka; Wataru Miyashita; Hye Young Seo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Comparison of condylar position in normal occlusion, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2 and Class III malocclusions using CBCT imaging.

Authors:  Pilar Rivero-Millán; Jose-Maria Barrera-Mora; Eduardo Espinar-Escalona; Carlos-Antonio González-Del Pino; Domingo Martín-Salvador; Jose-Maria Llamas-Carreras
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-12-01

5.  Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry.

Authors:  Seulgi Han; Sang Min Shin; Yong-Seok Choi; Ki Beom Kim; Tetsutaro Yamaguchi; Koutaro Maki; Chooryung J Chung; Yong-Il Kim
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Evaluation of condyle position in patients with Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography panoramic reconstructions.

Authors:  Aslıhan Akbulut; Delal Dara Kılınç
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Lower Facial Asymmetry in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Non-Cleft Patients with Class III Skeletal Relationship.

Authors:  Yifan Lin; Gui Chen; Zhen Fu; Lian Ma; Weiran Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Anteroposterior condylar position: a comparative study between subjects with normal occlusion and patients with Class I, Class II Division 1, and Class III malocclusions.

Authors:  Marcelo Reis Fraga; Andréia Fialho Rodrigues; Luiz Claudio Ribeiro; Marcio José da Silva Campos; Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-10-29

9.  Comparison of the condyle-fossa relationship between skeletal class III malocclusion patients with and without asymmetry: a retrospective three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomograpy study.

Authors:  Hyoun Oak Kim; Won Lee; Yoon-Ah Kook; Yoonji Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 1.372

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.