Literature DB >> 31638857

Evaluation of condyle-fossa relationships in adolescents with various skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.

Jong-Moon Chae, Jae Hyun Park, Kiyoshi Tai, Kyosuke Mizutani, Satoshi Uzuka, Wataru Miyashita, Hye Young Seo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the condyle-fossa relationship in adolescents with various skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CBCT images obtained in 120 adolescent patients were used for this study. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to 3 criteria: (1) age (early, middle, and late adolescence); (2) facial height ratio or Jarabak quotient (hyperdivergent, normodivergent, and hypodivergent); and (3) ANB classification (Class I, Class II, and Class III). Temporomandibular joint space (TMJS: AS, anterior space; SS, superior space; PS, posterior space; MS, medial space; LS, lateral space), width and depth of the condyle (MLT, mediolateral thickness; APT, anteroposterior thickness), articular slope (ArS) and vertical height of the fossa (VHF) were measured and compared using CBCT.
RESULTS: Differences in condyle-fossa relationships were not significantly different between male and female adolescents, but were significantly different (P < .05) between left and right sides. The mean values showed no statistical differences according to age and skeletal pattern. Most measurements in the sagittal view showed that SS was the greatest, and the mean ratio of AS to SS to PS was 1.00 to 1.27 to 1.19, respectively. The mean values of coronal MS and LS were not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: There were almost no statistical differences in the TMJS in adolescents across various factors except between left and right sides.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT; Condyle-fossa relationship; Skeletal patterns; TMJS

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31638857      PMCID: PMC8051241          DOI: 10.2319/052919-369.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  39 in total

1.  Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: a morphometric tomographic study.

Authors:  Elias G Katsavrias; Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Correlation between condylar position and different sagittal skeletal facial types.

Authors:  Maryam Paknahad; Shoaleh Shahidi; Hajar Abbaszade
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Temporomandibular joint and normal occlusion: Is there anything singular about it? A computed tomographic evaluation.

Authors:  Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral; Márcio José da Silva Campos; Andréia Fialho Rodrigues; Marcelo Reis Fraga
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Relationship of mandibular condylar position to dental occlusion factors in an asymptomatic population.

Authors:  A G Pullinger; W K Solberg; L Hollender; A Petersson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  A classification of skeletal facial types.

Authors:  V Sassouni
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1969-02

6.  Age and gender differences in temporomandibular joint radiographic findings before orthodontic treatment in adolescents.

Authors:  C G Petrikowski; M G Grace
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1999-03

Review 7.  Temporomandibular disorders: a review of current understanding.

Authors:  B H Goldstein
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1999-10

Review 8.  Optimum temporomandibular joint (TMJ) condylar position.

Authors:  R A Abdel-Fattah
Journal:  Todays FDA       Date:  1989-11

9.  Characteristics of articular fossa and condyle in patients with temporomandibular joint complaint.

Authors:  A Okur; M Ozkiris; Z Kapusuz; S Karaçavus; L Saydam
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.507

10.  Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? An epidemiologic study.

Authors:  P P Siriwat; J R Jarabak
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  7 in total

1.  The relationship of maxillary arch dimension with vertical facial morphology in proto-malay race.

Authors:  Hilda Fitria Lubis; Mimi Marina Lubis; Christinawaty Sutan
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Age-related variations in position and morphology of the temporomandibular joint in individuals with anterior openbite and crossbite: a multi-cross-sectional comparative study.

Authors:  Yanxi Chen; Jingxi Wang; Ying Li; Lingfeng Li; Nan Luo; Yan Wu; Hongwei Dai; Jianping Zhou
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Sagittal Condylar Inclination and Transversal Condylar Inclination in Different Skeletal Classes.

Authors:  Anahit Lewandowska; Katarzyna Mańka-Malara; Jolanta Kostrzewa-Janicka
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Comprehensive three-dimensional positional and morphological assessment of the temporomandibular joint in skeletal Class II patients with mandibular retrognathism in different vertical skeletal patterns.

Authors:  Saba Ahmed Al-Hadad; Enas Senan ALyafrusee; Abbas Ahmed Abdulqader; Waseem Saleh Al-Gumaei; Rana A A M Al-Mohana; Liling Ren
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Kyoung Jin Noh; Hyoung-Seon Baik; Sang-Sun Han; Woowon Jang; Yoon Jeong Choi
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 6.  Assessment of the Morphology and Degenerative Changes in the Temporomandibular Joint Using CBCT according to the Orthodontic Approach: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sebastian Dygas; Izabela Szarmach; Ilona Radej
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The relation between incisal guidance angle and the growth and development of temporomandibular joint: a multi-cross-sectional retrospective study.

Authors:  Ying Li; Wenwen Zhou; Yan Wu; Hongwei Dai; Jianping Zhou
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.757

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.