Literature DB >> 30484184

Evaluation of condyle position in patients with Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography panoramic reconstructions.

Aslıhan Akbulut1, Delal Dara Kılınç2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to compare the positions of the right and left condyles between male and female patients with different Angle malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) panoramic reconstructions.
METHODS: The CBCT images of 60 patients (age of 18-37 years) were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided according to their Angle malocclusion classifications (Angle Classes I, II, and III). The condyle-to-eminence, condyle-to-fossa, and condyle-to-meatus distances were measured digitally using i-CAT software.
RESULTS: The left and right condyle-to-fossa distances were the most variable parameters among the Angle classes. The right condyle-to-eminence and right condyle-to-fossa distances were significantly different among the classes. Male patients seemed to have a greater condyle-to-fossa distance on the right side in both the Class I and III groups. The mean distance from the condyle to eminence, condyle to fossa, and condyle to meatus on the right side was the greatest in the Angle Class II group.
CONCLUSIONS: In all three types of malocclusion (Angle Classes I, II, and III), the condyles on both the right and left sides were not exactly symmetric or centrally located within the glenoid fossa. This work emphasizes the differences in the condyle position between male and female patients. Furthermore, the symmetry and centricity of the condyles are not dependent on the patient's sex or type of malocclusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT; Condyle position; Panoramic; Ricketts; Temporomandibular joint

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30484184     DOI: 10.1007/s11282-018-0326-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Radiol        ISSN: 0911-6028            Impact factor:   1.852


  31 in total

1.  Multifactorial modeling of temporomandibular anatomic and orthopedic relationships in normal versus undifferentiated disk displacement joints.

Authors:  Andrew G Pullinger; Donald A Seligman; Mike T John; Stephen Harkins
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 2.  Temporomandibular joint imaging.

Authors:  R W Katzberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: a morphometric tomographic study.

Authors:  Elias G Katsavrias; Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging.

Authors:  Robert A Mischkowski; Reinhard Pulsfort; Lutz Ritter; Jörg Neugebauer; Hans Georg Brochhagen; Erwin Keeve; Joachim E Zöller
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2007-07-05

5.  Tomographic evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in malocclusion subjects: condylar morphology and position.

Authors:  Luciana Fonseca Merigue; Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti; Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro; Ricardo de Lima Navarro; Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2016-03-08

6.  The effect of bite plane use on terminal hinge axis location.

Authors:  E H Williamson; D L Evans; W A Barton; B H Williams
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Remodelling of the mandibular condyle in the adult and its relationship to the condition of the dental arches.

Authors:  F Mongini
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1972

8.  Association between mandibular condylar position and clinical dysfunction index.

Authors:  Maryam Paknahad; Shoaleh Shahidi
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Three-Dimensional Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Using MRI-CBCT Image Registration.

Authors:  Mohammed A Q Al-Saleh; Kumaradevan Punithakumar; Manuel Lagravere; Pierre Boulanger; Jacob L Jaremko; Paul W Major
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of the condyle-fossa relationship between skeletal class III malocclusion patients with and without asymmetry: a retrospective three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomograpy study.

Authors:  Hyoun Oak Kim; Won Lee; Yoon-Ah Kook; Yoonji Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 1.372

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of the Morphology and Degenerative Changes in the Temporomandibular Joint Using CBCT according to the Orthodontic Approach: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sebastian Dygas; Izabela Szarmach; Ilona Radej
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.