Literature DB >> 21723299

Review: Game theory of public goods in one-shot social dilemmas without assortment.

Marco Archetti1, István Scheuring.   

Abstract

We review the theory of public goods in biology. In the N-person prisoner's dilemma, where the public good is a linear function of the individual contributions, cooperation requires some form of assortment, for example due to kin discrimination, population viscosity or repeated interactions. In most social species ranging from bacteria to humans, however, public goods are usually a non-linear function of the contributions, which makes cooperation possible without assortment. More specifically, a polymorphic state can be stable in which cooperators and non-cooperators coexist. The existence of mixed equilibria in public goods games is a fundamental result in the study of cooperation that has been overlooked so far, because of the disproportionate attention given to the two- and N-person prisoner's dilemma. Methods and results from games with pairwise interactions or linear benefits cannot, in general, be extended to the analysis of public goods. Game theory helps explain the production of public goods in one-shot, N-person interactions without assortment, it leads to predictions that can be easily tested and allows a prescriptive approach to cooperation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21723299     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  62 in total

1.  Confrontational scavenging as a possible source for language and cooperation.

Authors:  Derek Bickerton; Eörs Szathmáry
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 2.  Collective action problem in heterogeneous groups.

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Host discrimination in modular mutualisms: a theoretical framework for meta-populations of mutualists and exploiters.

Authors:  Brian S Steidinger; James D Bever
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The organization and control of an evolving interdependent population.

Authors:  Dervis C Vural; Alexander Isakov; L Mahadevan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Reply to Gerlee and Altrock: Diffusion and population size in game theory models of cancer.

Authors:  Marco Archetti; Daniela A Ferraro; Gerhard Christofori
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Structure coefficients and strategy selection in multiplayer games.

Authors:  Alex McAvoy; Christoph Hauert
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Evolutionary dynamics of higher-order interactions in social networks.

Authors:  Unai Alvarez-Rodriguez; Federico Battiston; Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda; Yamir Moreno; Matjaž Perc; Vito Latora
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-01-04

8.  On the stochastic evolution of finite populations.

Authors:  Fabio A C C Chalub; Max O Souza
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Population structure reduces benefits from partner choice in mutualistic symbiosis.

Authors:  Erol Akçay
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The coevolution of cooperation and cognition in humans.

Authors:  Miguel Dos Santos; Stuart A West
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.