Literature DB >> 26740613

Host discrimination in modular mutualisms: a theoretical framework for meta-populations of mutualists and exploiters.

Brian S Steidinger1, James D Bever2.   

Abstract

Plants in multiple symbioses are exploited by symbionts that consume their resources without providing services. Discriminating hosts are thought to stabilize mutualism by preferentially allocating resources into anatomical structures (modules) where services are generated, with examples of modules including the entire inflorescences of figs and the root nodules of legumes. Modules are often colonized by multiple symbiotic partners, such that exploiters that co-occur with mutualists within mixed modules can share rewards generated by their mutualist competitors. We developed a meta-population model to answer how the population dynamics of mutualists and exploiters change when they interact with hosts with different module occupancies (number of colonists per module) and functionally different patterns of allocation into mixed modules. We find that as module occupancy increases, hosts must increase the magnitude of preferentially allocated resources in order to sustain comparable populations of mutualists. Further, we find that mixed colonization can result in the coexistence of mutualist and exploiter partners, but only when preferential allocation follows a saturating function of the number of mutualists in a module. Finally, using published data from the fig-wasp mutualism as an illustrative example, we derive model predictions that approximate the proportion of exploiter, non-pollinating wasps observed in the field.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Keywords:  host sanctions; meta-population dynamics; modularity; preferential allocation; stability of mutualism

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26740613      PMCID: PMC4721098          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  30 in total

1.  Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Carbon dynamics in mycorrhizal symbioses is linked to carbon costs and phosphorus benefits.

Authors:  Pål Axel Olsson; Jannice Rahm; Nasser Aliasgharzad
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.194

3.  Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism.

Authors:  E Toby Kiers; Robert A Rousseau; Stuart A West; R Ford Denison
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Plant species differ in their ability to reduce allocation to non-beneficial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

Authors:  Emily Grman
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  An empirical test of partner choice mechanisms in a wild legume-rhizobium interaction.

Authors:  Ellen L Simms; D Lee Taylor; Joshua Povich; Richard P Shefferson; J L Sachs; M Urbina; Y Tausczik
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Trade-offs between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal competitive ability and host growth promotion in Plantago lanceolata.

Authors:  Alison Elizabeth Bennett; James D Bever
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis.

Authors:  E Toby Kiers; Marie Duhamel; Yugandhar Beesetty; Jerry A Mensah; Oscar Franken; Erik Verbruggen; Carl R Fellbaum; George A Kowalchuk; Miranda M Hart; Alberto Bago; Todd M Palmer; Stuart A West; Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse; Jan Jansa; Heike Bücking
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The coexistence of hosts with different abilities to discriminate against cheater partners: an evolutionary game-theory approach.

Authors:  Brian S Steidinger; James D Bever
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Selection for protection in an ant-plant mutualism: host sanctions, host modularity, and the principal-agent game.

Authors:  David P Edwards; Mark Hassall; William J Sutherland; Douglas W Yu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Toward an evolutionary definition of cheating.

Authors:  Melanie Ghoul; Ashleigh S Griffin; Stuart A West
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  8 in total

1.  Population structure reduces benefits from partner choice in mutualistic symbiosis.

Authors:  Erol Akçay
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Compartmentalization drives the evolution of symbiotic cooperation.

Authors:  Guillaume Chomicki; Gijsbert D A Werner; Stuart A West; E Toby Kiers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Symbiosis and stress: how plant microbiomes affect host evolution.

Authors:  Christine V Hawkes; James J Bull; Jennifer A Lau
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Mechanisms and Impact of Symbiotic Phosphate Acquisition.

Authors:  Chai Hao Chiu; Uta Paszkowski
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Policing the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis: a critical test of partner choice.

Authors:  Annet Westhoek; Elsa Field; Finn Rehling; Geraldine Mulley; Isabel Webb; Philip S Poole; Lindsay A Turnbull
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Genome-wide association analyses reveal the genetic basis of biomass accumulation under symbiotic nitrogen fixation in African soybean.

Authors:  Davoud Torkamaneh; François-P Chalifour; Chantal J Beauchamp; Hesham Agrama; Steve Boahen; Halim Maaroufi; Istvan Rajcan; François Belzile
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Carbon allocation and competition maintain variation in plant root mutualisms.

Authors:  Natalie Christian; James D Bever
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Genetic conflict with a parasitic nematode disrupts the legume-rhizobia mutualism.

Authors:  Corlett W Wood; Bonnie L Pilkington; Priya Vaidya; Caroline Biel; John R Stinchcombe
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2018-04-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.