Literature DB >> 22895686

Rotator cuff integrity correlates with clinical and functional results at a minimum 16 years after open repair.

Martti Vastamäki1, Martina Lohman, Niclas Borgmästars.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recurrent or persistent defects in the rotator cuff after its repair are common. Short- and medium-term surveys have revealed, after open repair, patients with an intact rotator cuff have increased function and ROM. However, no long-term studies have verified cuff integrity on MR arthrography or correlated it with clinical and functional outcomes. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We evaluated long-term cuff integrity and fatty infiltration after open repair using MR arthrography and determined whether these findings correlated with clinical and functional results.
METHODS: Using MR arthrography, we retrospectively evaluated 67 patients (48 men, 19 women) who underwent open rotator cuff repair between 1980 and 1989. Their mean age at surgery was 52 years. Minimum followup was 16 years (mean, 20 years; range, 16-25 years).
RESULTS: The retear rate was 94%, and mean size of rerupture was 3.5 × 3.6 cm (ranges, 0.5-5.0 cm × 0.5-5.2 cm; median, 4 × 4 cm). The remaining four patients had a partial supraspinatus tendon tear. Fatty infiltration was marked in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons. Cuff integrity correlated with clinical results: active external rotation and forward flexion, and flexion, abduction, and external rotation strengths, were better in patients with an intact rotator cuff or a small retear of 4 cm(2) or less than in patients with larger tears. Cuff integrity also correlated with functional results.
CONCLUSIONS: Rotator cuff integrity was lost in 94% of patients after a minimum followup of 16 years. Cuff integrity correlates well with clinical and functional results even several years postoperatively. A large retear seems to be the most important factor in deteriorating long-term clinical and functional results after open rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22895686      PMCID: PMC3549157          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2494-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  29 in total

1.  Functional outcome after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears in individuals with pseudoparalysis.

Authors:  Patrick J Denard; Alexandre Lädermann; Alisha Z Jiwani; Stephen S Burkhart
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff.

Authors:  D T Harryman; L A Mack; K Y Wang; S E Jackins; M L Richardson; F A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Prospective evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs at 5 years: part II--prognostic factors for clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Authors:  Lawrence V Gulotta; Shane J Nho; Christopher C Dodson; Ronald S Adler; David W Altchek; John D MacGillivray
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Normalization of the Constant score.

Authors:  Leonid I Katolik; Anthony A Romeo; Brian J Cole; Nikhil N Verma; Jennifer K Hayden; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Fatty infiltration and atrophy of the rotator cuff do not improve after rotator cuff repair and correlate with poor functional outcome.

Authors:  James N Gladstone; Julie Y Bishop; Ian K Y Lo; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  D F Gazielly; P Gleyze; C Montagnon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective functional outcome and repair integrity at minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Brian J Cole; L Pearce McCarty; Richard W Kang; Winslow Alford; Paul B Lewis; Jennifer K Hayden
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Long-term outcome and structural integrity following open repair of massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Christoph Bartl; Pannos Kouloumentas; Konstantin Holzapfel; Stefan Eichhorn; Klaus Wörtler; Andreas Imhoff; Gian M Salzmann
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2012-01

10.  The factors affecting the clinical outcome and integrity of arthroscopically repaired rotator cuff tears of the shoulder.

Authors:  Nam Su Cho; Yong Girl Rhee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-05-30
View more
  18 in total

1.  Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized study with 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Zhenxiang Zhang; Beibei Gu; Wei Zhu; Lixian Zhu; Qingsong Li
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-28

2.  CORR Insights®: Muscle fibers are injured at the time of acute and chronic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Scott G Kaar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Do functional outcomes and cuff integrity correlate after single- versus double-row rotator cuff repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Mohamed H Sobhy; Ahmed Hany Khater; Medhat Ragab Hassan; Ossama El Shazly
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-13

4.  Clinical and anatomic results of surgical repair of chronic rotator cuff tears at ten-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Fanny Elia; Vadim Azoulay; Julie Lebon; Amélie Faraud; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Full-thickness rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 55 years: clinical outcome of arthroscopic repair in comparison with older patients.

Authors:  Tim Dwyer; Helen Razmjou; Richard Holtby
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Clinical and anatomic results of rotator cuff repair at 10 years depend on tear type.

Authors:  Charles Agout; Julien Berhouet; Yves Bouju; Arnaud Godenèche; Philippe Collin; Jean-François Kempf; Luc Favard
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Structural integrity of rotator cuff at 16 years following repair: good long-term outcomes despite recurrent tears.

Authors:  Robert S J Elliott; Yi-Jia Lim; Jennifer Coghlan; John Troupis; Simon Bell
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 8.  The optimal treatment for stage 2-3 Goutallier rotator cuff tears: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Freek Hollman; Nienke Wolterbeek; Petra E Flikweert; Kiem G Auw Yang
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-18

Review 9.  Update on all-arthroscopic vs. mini-open rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seaher Sakha; Safiya Erdogan; Ajaykumar Shanmugaraj; Marcel Betsch; Timothy Leroux; Moin Khan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-27

10.  Association between functional outcome scores and MRI-based structural integrity after rotator cuff repair: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Souvik Paul; Tarun Goyal; Arvind Kumar Yadav
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.