Literature DB >> 29362995

The Repaired Rotator Cuff: MRI and Ultrasound Evaluation.

Susan C Lee1, Danielle Williams2, Yoshimi Endo2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purposes of this review were to provide an overview of the current practice of evaluating the postoperative rotator cuff on imaging and to review the salient imaging findings of the normal and abnormal postoperative rotator cuff, as well as of postoperative complications. RECENT
FINDINGS: The repaired rotator cuff frequently appears abnormal on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US). Recent studies have shown that while the tendons typically normalize, they can demonstrate clinically insignificant abnormal imaging appearances for longer than 6 months. Features of capsular thickening or subacromial-subdeltoid bursal thickening and fluid distension were found to decrease substantially in the first 6-month postoperative period. MRI and US were found to be highly comparable in the postoperative assessment of the rotator cuff, although they had a lower sensitivity for partial thickness tears. Imaging evaluation of newer techniques such as patch augmentation and superior capsular reconstruction needs to be further investigated. MRI and US are useful in the postoperative assessment of the rotator cuff, not only for evaluation of the integrity of the rotator cuff, but also for detecting hardware complications and other etiologies of shoulder pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; Rotator cuff re-tear; Rotator cuff repair; Ultrasound

Year:  2018        PMID: 29362995      PMCID: PMC5825344          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-018-9463-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  51 in total

Review 1.  MRI of the postoperative shoulder.

Authors:  Michael B Zlatkin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  MR imaging and MR arthrography of the postoperative shoulder: spectrum of normal and abnormal findings.

Authors:  Aurea V R Mohana-Borges; Christine B Chung; Donald Resnick
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  When do rotator cuff repairs fail? Serial ultrasound examination after arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Bruce S Miller; Brian K Downie; Robert B Kohen; Theresa Kijek; Bryson Lesniak; Jon A Jacobson; Richard E Hughes; James E Carpenter
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Factors predicting rotator cuff retears: an analysis of 1000 consecutive rotator cuff repairs.

Authors:  Brian T N Le; Xiao L Wu; Patrick H Lam; George A C Murrell
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Shoulder after rotator cuff repair: MR imaging findings in asymptomatic individuals--initial experience.

Authors:  A L Spielmann; B B Forster; P Kokan; R H Hawkins; D L Janzen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Rotator cuff tears: clinical, radiographic, and US findings.

Authors:  Josh B Moosikasuwan; Theodore T Miller; Brian J Burke
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Case study: failure of superior capsular reconstruction using dermal allograft.

Authors:  J Zerr; J D McDermott; N M Beckmann; R K Fullick; A Chhabra
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Sonography of the postoperative shoulder.

Authors:  L A Mack; D A Nyberg; F R Matsen; R F Kilcoyne; D Harvey
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Magnetic resonance appearance of bioabsorbable anchor screws for double row arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.

Authors:  Aditya C Pawaskar; Aashay Kekatpure; Nam-Su Cho; Yong-Girl Rhee; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 10.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography, MRI and MR arthrography in the characterisation of rotator cuff disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Roy; Caroline Braën; Jean Leblond; François Desmeules; Clermont E Dionne; Joy C MacDermid; Nathalie J Bureau; Pierre Frémont
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Allograft and autograft provide similar retear rates for the management of large and massive rotator cuff tears: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Villatte; Roger Erivan; Geoffroy Nourissat; Pierre-Sylvain Marcheix; Bruno Pereira; Sylvain Aubret; Stéphane Boisgard; Stéphane Descamps
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Five Year Follow up of Retrospective Cohort Comparing Structural and Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Single-row ersus Double-row Suture Bridge Repair of Large Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tear in Patients Less than or Equal to 70 Years.

Authors:  Vivek Pandey; Joseph C J; Naveen J Mathai; Sandesh Madi; Lakshmikanth H Karegowda; Jaap Willems
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-07

3.  Association between functional outcome scores and MRI-based structural integrity after rotator cuff repair: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Souvik Paul; Tarun Goyal; Arvind Kumar Yadav
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Evaluation of Diagnostic Precision of Ultrasound for Rotator Cuff Disorders in Patients with Shoulder Pain.

Authors:  Behzad Aminzadeh; Samane Najafi; Ali Moradi; Bita Abbasi; Donya Farrokh; Maryam Emadzadeh
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-11

5.  Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Superior Capsular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian L Badman; Aaron M Baessler; Molly Moor
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-04-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.