Literature DB >> 21718955

MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata: long-term outcomes.

Hyun S Kim1, Jun-Hyun Baik, Luu D Pham, Michael A Jacobs.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance--guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-g HIFU) treatments for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were recruited for a prospective study for MR-g HIFU treatments of symptomatic leiomyomata, with up to 3-year follow-up. The study was approved by the institutional review board and was Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act--compliant. Clinical assessments were obtained at 3 months, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 3 years after MR-g HIFU, as well as uterine fibroid symptom severity scores (SSS) and health-related quality of life questionnaires (UFS-QOL). MR imaging was performed at each follow-up to assess the efficacy of the treatment at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years.
RESULTS: Fifty-one leiomyomata in 40 patients were treated. All patients were treated within the US Food and Drug Administration guidelines with leiomyomata localized on MR and treated with sonication. The mean baseline volume of treated leiomyomata was 336.9 cm(3). The mean improvement scores for transformed SSS was 47.8 (P < .001) and for tUFS-QOL was 39.8 (P < .001) at 3 years. The mean volume decrease in treated leiomyomata was 32.0% (P < .001), and, in the uterus, the volume decrease was 27.7% (P < .001) at 3 years. There were no long-term complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up data from MR-g HIFU treatments show sustained symptomatic relief among enrolled patients. Although the results are preliminary, MR-g HIFU for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata may result in acceptable long-term outcomes at 3 years.
Copyright © 2011 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21718955      PMCID: PMC3401073          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  31 in total

Review 1.  Uterine fibroids: a clinical review.

Authors:  B J Vollenhoven; A S Lawrence; D L Healy
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1990-04

2.  Hysterectomy surveillance--United States, 1980-1993.

Authors:  L A Lepine; S D Hillis; P A Marchbanks; L M Koonin; B Morrow; B A Kieke; L S Wilcox
Journal:  MMWR CDC Surveill Summ       Date:  1997-08-08

3.  Effects of utero-ovarian anastomoses on clinical outcomes and repeat intervention rates after uterine artery embolization.

Authors:  Hyun S Kim; Jason Tsai; Ajanta Patra; Judy M Lee; John G Griffith; Edward E Wallach
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Complications after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas.

Authors:  James B Spies; Amy Spector; Antoinette R Roth; Chandra M Baker; Lauren Mauro; Kerry Murphy-Skrynarz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency thermal ablation for large symptomatic uterine leiomyomata after uterine artery embolization: a feasibility and safety study.

Authors:  Hyun S Kim; Jason Tsai; Michael A Jacobs; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Tolerance, hospital stay, and recovery after uterine artery embolization for fibroids: the Ontario Uterine Fibroid Embolization Trial.

Authors:  Gaylene Pron; Eva Mocarski; John Bennett; George Vilos; Andrew Common; Mukarram Zaidi; Kenneth Sniderman; Murray Asch; Roman Kozak; Martin Simons; Cuong Tran; John Kachura
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Uterine artery embolization for treatment of leiomyomata: long-term outcomes from the FIBROID Registry.

Authors:  Scott C Goodwin; James B Spies; Robert Worthington-Kirsch; Eric Peterson; Gaylene Pron; Shuang Li; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Interventional magnetic resonance imaging cryotherapy of uterine fibroid tumors: preliminary observation.

Authors:  Bryan D Cowan; Patrick E Sewell; Jeffery C Howard; Richard M Arriola; Lynda G Robinette
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  MRI guidance of focused ultrasound therapy of uterine fibroids: early results.

Authors:  Jonathan Hindley; Wladyslaw M Gedroyc; Lesley Regan; Elizabeth Stewart; Clare Tempany; Kullervo Hynyen; Kullervo Hynnen; Nathan Mcdannold; Nathan Macdanold; Yael Inbar; Yacov Itzchak; Jaron Rabinovici; Hyun S Kim; Kevin Kim; Jean-François Geschwind; Gina Hesley; Bobbie Gostout; Brian Gostout; Tillman Ehrenstein; Sylvia Hengst; Miri Sklair-Levy; Asher Shushan; Ferenc Jolesz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for treatment of uterine fibroids.

Authors:  H Zowall; J A Cairns; C Brewer; D L Lamping; W M W Gedroyc; L Regan
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  29 in total

1.  MRI-compatible positioning device for guiding a focused ultrasound system for transrectal treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christos Yiallouras; Nicos Mylonas; Christakis Damianou
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  The role of T1 perfusion-based classification in magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Bilgin Keserci; Nguyen Minh Duc
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Academic radiology in the new health care delivery environment.

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; John-Paul J Yu; Akash P Kansagra; Nathaniel von Fischer; Daniel Costa; Matthew Heller; Stamatis Kantartzis; R Scooter Plowman; Jason Itri
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 4.  Reproductive impact of MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery for fibroids: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Natalie A Clark; Sunni L Mumford; James H Segars
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 5.  Uterine fibroid therapy using interventional radiology mini-invasive treatments: current perspective.

Authors:  Carlo Masciocchi; Francesco Arrigoni; Fabiana Ferrari; Aldo Victor Giordano; Sonia Iafrate; Ilaria Capretti; Ester Cannizzaro; Alfonso Reginelli; Anna Maria Ierardi; Chiara Floridi; Alessio Salvatore Angileri; Luca Brunese; Antonio Barile
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Portable ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound with functions for safe and rapid ablation: prospective clinical trial for uterine fibroids-short-term and long-term results.

Authors:  Jae Young Lee; Hyun Hoon Chung; Soo Yeon Kang; Eun-Joo Park; Dong Hyuk Park; Keonho Son; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids - Potential Impact on Fertility and Pregnancy Outcome.

Authors:  M K Bohlmann; F Hoellen; P Hunold; M David
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 8.  Updates on MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids.

Authors:  Divya Sridhar; Maureen P Kohi
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 9.  Clinical and Technical Aspects of MR-Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids.

Authors:  Laura E Rueff; Steven S Raman
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.513

10.  MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine fibroid treatment: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Chung Y Kong; Lesley Meng; Zehra B Omer; J Shannon Swan; Serene Srouji; G Scott Gazelle; Fiona M Fennessy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.