Literature DB >> 18165389

Uterine artery embolization for treatment of leiomyomata: long-term outcomes from the FIBROID Registry.

Scott C Goodwin1, James B Spies, Robert Worthington-Kirsch, Eric Peterson, Gaylene Pron, Shuang Li, Evan R Myers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term clinical outcomes of uterine artery embolization across a wide variety of practice settings in a large patient cohort.
METHODS: The Fibroid Registry for Outcomes Data (FIBROID) for Uterine Embolization was a 3-year, single-arm, prospective, multi-center longitudinal study of the short- and long-term outcomes of uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. Two thousand one hundred twelve patients with symptomatic leiomyomata were eligible for long-term follow-up at 27 sites representing a geographically diverse set of practices, including academic centers, community hospitals, and closed-panel health maintenance organizations. At 36 months after treatment, 1,916 patients remained in the study, and of these, 1,278 patients completed the survey. The primary measures of outcome were the symptom and health-related quality-of-life scores from the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire.
RESULTS: Mean symptom scores improved 41.41 points (P<.001), and the quality of life scores improved 41.47 points (P<.001), both moving into the normal range for this questionnaire. The improvements were independent of practice setting. During the 3 years of the study, Kaplan-Meier estimates of hysterectomy, myomectomy, or repeat uterine artery embolization were 9.79%, 2.82%, and 1.83% of the patients, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Uterine artery embolization results in a durable improvement in quality of life. These results are achievable when the procedure is performed in any experienced community or academic interventional radiology practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18165389     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000296526.71749.c9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  47 in total

1.  Uterine artery embolisation versus hysterectomy for leiomyomas: primary and 2-year follow-up results of a randomised prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Anu Ruuskanen; Maritta Hippeläinen; Petri Sipola; Hannu Manninen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Imaging before and after uterine artery embolization].

Authors:  T J Kröncke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  [Long-term results after fibroid embolization].

Authors:  S Müller-Hülsbeck
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Proceedings from the Third National Institutes of Health International Congress on Advances in Uterine Leiomyoma Research: comprehensive review, conference summary and future recommendations.

Authors:  James H Segars; Estella C Parrott; Joan D Nagel; Xiaoxiao Catherine Guo; Xiaohua Gao; Linda S Birnbaum; Vivian W Pinn; Darlene Dixon
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 15.610

5.  Uterine artery embolization: a safe and effective, minimally invasive, uterine-sparing treatment option for symptomatic fibroids.

Authors:  Nghia-Jack Vo; R Torrance Andrews
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Three-Dimensional Quantitative Assessment of Uterine Fibroid Response after Uterine Artery Embolization Using Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging.

Authors:  Julius Chapiro; Rafael Duran; MingDe Lin; John D Werner; Zhijun Wang; Rüdiger Schernthaner; Lynn Jeanette Savic; Mark L Lessne; Jean-François Geschwind; Kelvin Hong
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  The effect of uterine fibroid embolization on lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  David Shveiky; Cheryl B Iglesia; Danielle D Antosh; Bela I Kudish; Joanna Peterson; Chun-Chih Huang; Chun-Chin Huang; James B Spies
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Hysterectomy-current methods and alternatives for benign indications.

Authors:  Michail S Papadopoulos; Athanasios C Tolikas; Dimosthenis E Miliaras
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-07-28

9.  Socioeconomic indicators and hysterectomy status in the United States, 2004.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Erekson; Sherry Weitzen; Vivian W Sung; Christina A Raker; Deborah L Myers
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.142

10.  Uterine artery embolization in patients with a large fibroid burden: long-term clinical and MR follow-up.

Authors:  Albert J Smeets; Robbert J Nijenhuis; Willem Jan van Rooij; Emilie A M Weimar; Peter F Boekkooi; Leo E H Lampmann; Harry A M Vervest; Paul N M Lohle
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.