Literature DB >> 16996558

Subjective appearance of ambiguous structure-from-motion can be driven by objective switches of a separate less ambiguous context.

Elliot D Freeman1, Jon Driver.   

Abstract

Two ambiguous transparent structure-from-motion (SFM) stimuli often appear to co-rotate. Grossmann & Dobbins (2003) reported breakdown of such perceptual coupling when one stimulus was made unambiguous (by rendering it opaque), leading them to propose that coupling depends generally on differential stimulus ambiguity. In contrast, we demonstrate robust stimulus-driven coupling even when one SFM stimulus is relatively disambiguated, by using relative-luminance and/or binocular-disparity cues. Such context stimuli could induce stimulus-driven coupling by disambiguating the transparent stimulus, though critically only when the context was clearly non-opaque and coaxial with the ambiguous stimulus. This demonstrates long-range information-sharing between separate stimulus representations, subject to specific constraints.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16996558     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

Review 1.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Does visual attention drive the dynamics of bistable perception?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jan Brascamp; Duje Tadin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Dynamics of temporally interleaved percept-choice sequences: interaction via adaptation in shared neural populations.

Authors:  André J Noest; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Ambiguity is a linking feature for interocular grouping.

Authors:  Sunny M Lee; Emily Slezak; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

5.  Absence of cue-recruitment for extrinsic signals: sounds, spots, and swirling dots fail to influence perceived 3D rotation direction after training.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Stuart Fuller; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The Certainty of Ambiguity in Visual Neural Representations.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 7.745

7.  General validity of Levelt's propositions reveals common computational mechanisms for visual rivalry.

Authors:  P Christiaan Klink; Raymond van Ee; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cue-recruitment for extrinsic signals after training with low information stimuli.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Stuart Fuller; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Change not State: Perceptual coupling in multistable displays reflects transient bias induced by perceptual change.

Authors:  Alexander Pastukhov; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-08-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.