Literature DB >> 25709932

Comparing the intraoperative complication rate of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery to traditional phacoemulsification.

Ming Chen1, Christian Swinney1, Mindy Chen2.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the complication rate of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and traditional phacoemulsification for the first 18mo of FLACS use at a private surgical center in Hawaii.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted from January 2012 to June 2013. The first 273 consecutive eyes receiving FLACS and 553 eyes receiving traditional phacoemulsification were examined. All surgeries were performed at a single surgical center in Hawaii. The presence of intraoperative complications was used as the main outcome measure. Approval was obtained from the institutional review board of the University of Hawaii.
RESULTS: The overall complication rate for FLACS was 1.8%, while that of the traditional procedure was 5.8% (P<0.05). A majority of the surgeons (80%) had a lower complication rate while using FLACS.
CONCLUSION: FLACS is comparable in safety, if not safer, than traditional cataract surgery when performed by qualified cataract surgeons on carefully selected patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cataract surgery; cataract surgery complications; femtosecond laser; phacoemulsification

Year:  2015        PMID: 25709932      PMCID: PMC4325266          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.01.34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of IOL power calculation and refractive outcome after laser refractive cataract surgery with a femtosecond laser versus conventional phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Tamás Filkorn; Illés Kovács; Agnes Takács; Eva Horváth; Michael C Knorz; Zoltán Z Nagy
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Lingmin He; Katrina Sheehy; William Culbertson
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.761

3.  Complications of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Zoltan Z Nagy; Agnes I Takacs; Tamas Filkorn; Kinga Kránitz; Andrea Gyenes; Éva Juhász; Gábor L Sándor; Illes Kovacs; Tibor Juhász; Stephen Slade
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 4.  A review of femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery for Hawai'i.

Authors:  Ming Chen
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2013-05

5.  Laser-phakopuncture in the treatment of soft cataracts.

Authors:  M M Krasnov
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Femtosecond laser capsulotomy and manual continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis parameters and their effects on intraocular lens centration.

Authors:  Kinga Kránitz; Agnes Takacs; Kata Miháltz; Illés Kovács; Michael C Knorz; Zoltán Z Nagy
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Early experience with the femtosecond laser for cataract surgery.

Authors:  Shveta Jindal Bali; Chris Hodge; Michael Lawless; Timothy V Roberts; Gerard Sutton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Surgical outcomes and safety of femtosecond laser cataract surgery: a prospective study of 1500 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Timothy V Roberts; Michael Lawless; Shveta J Bali; Chris Hodge; Gerard Sutton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Initial clinical evaluation of an intraocular femtosecond laser in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Zoltan Nagy; Agnes Takacs; Tamas Filkorn; Melvin Sarayba
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.573

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery performed by surgeons-in-training.

Authors:  Greg Brunin; Khurrum Khan; Kristin S Biggerstaff; Li Wang; Douglas D Koch; Sumitra S Khandelwal
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparative evaluation of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification in white cataract.

Authors:  Jeewan S Titiyal; Manpreet Kaur; Archita Singh; Tarun Arora; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-22

Review 3.  A Meta-Analysis Comparing Postoperative Complications and Outcomes of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification for Cataract.

Authors:  Zi Ye; Zhaohui Li; Shouzhi He
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Risk factors for the occurrence of visual-threatening posterior capsule opacification.

Authors:  Hung-Chi Chen; Chia-Yi Lee; Chi-Chin Sun; Jing-Yang Huang; Hung-Yu Lin; Shun-Fa Yang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  Comparison of the selected parameters of the anterior segment of the eye between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, microincision cataract surgery, and conventional phacoemulsification: A case-control study.

Authors:  Edyta Chlasta-Twardzik; Anna Nowińska; Edward Wylęgała
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Advances in femtosecond laser technology.

Authors:  Thais Pinheiro Callou; Renato Garcia; Adriana Mukai; Natalia T Giacomin; Rodrigo Guimarães de Souza; Samir J Bechara
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-19

7.  Comparing the Curative Effects between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery and Conventional Phacoemulsification Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xinyi Chen; Kailin Chen; Jiliang He; Ke Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Clinical and Surgical Outcomes of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery (FLACS) on Hard Cataracts in the Egyptian Population.

Authors:  Mohamed Gamal Ebidalla Elghobaier; Mohamed Farag Khalil Ibrahiem; Ahmed Shawkat Abdelhalim; Ahmed Mostafa Eid; Khalid Al Said Murad
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.