Literature DB >> 21709185

Phase II trial of cetuximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin followed by chemoradiation with cetuximab for locally advanced (T4) pancreatic adenocarcinoma: correlation of Smad4(Dpc4) immunostaining with pattern of disease progression.

Christopher H Crane1, Gauri R Varadhachary, John S Yordy, Gregg A Staerkel, Milind M Javle, Howard Safran, Waqar Haque, Bridgett D Hobbs, Sunil Krishnan, Jason B Fleming, Prajnan Das, Jeffrey E Lee, James L Abbruzzese, Robert A Wolff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This phase II trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of cetuximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin followed by cetuximab, capecitabine, and radiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment-naive eligible patients (n = 69) received intravenous gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks for four doses, followed by radiation (50.4 Gy to the gross tumor only) with concurrent capecitabine (825 mg/m(2) twice daily on radiation treatment days). Cetuximab (500 mg/m(2)) was started on day 1 of chemotherapy and was continued every 2 weeks during chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. Diagnostic cytology specimens were immunostained for Smad4(Dpc4) expression.
RESULTS: Median overall survival time was 19.2 months (95% CI, 14.2 to 24.2 months), and 1-year, 2-year, and 4-year actuarial overall survival rates were 66.0%, 25.02%, and 11.3%, respectively. Acneiform rash correlated with improved survival (P = .001), but initial CA19-9, borderline resectable initial stage, and surgical resection (n = 7) did not. The 1-year and 2-year radiographic local progression rates were 22.8% and 61.0%, respectively. The worst acute toxic effects were GI toxicity (32% and 10% for grades 2 and 3, respectively); fatigue (26% and 6% for grades 2 and 3, respectively); sensory neuropathy (9% and 1% for grades 2 and 3, respectively); and acneiform rash (54% and 3% for grades 2 and 3, respectively). Smad4(Dpc4) expression correlated with a local rather than a distant dominant pattern of disease progression (P = .016).
CONCLUSION: This regimen appears effective and has acceptable toxicity. The primary end point (1-year overall survival rate > 45%) was met, with encouraging survival duration. Smad4(Dpc4) immunostaining correlated with the pattern of disease progression. Prospective validation of Smad4(Dpc4) expression in cytology specimens as a predictive biomarker is warranted and may lead to personalized treatment strategies for patients with localized pancreatic cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21709185      PMCID: PMC3157965          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.8038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  15 in total

1.  Smad4 is dispensable for normal pancreas development yet critical in progression and tumor biology of pancreas cancer.

Authors:  Nabeel Bardeesy; Kuang-Hung Cheng; Justin H Berger; Gerald C Chu; Jessica Pahler; Peter Olson; Aram F Hezel; James Horner; Gregory Y Lauwers; Douglas Hanahan; Ronald A DePinho
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial.

Authors:  C Louvet; R Labianca; P Hammel; G Lledo; M G Zampino; T André; A Zaniboni; M Ducreux; E Aitini; J Taïeb; R Faroux; C Lepere; A de Gramont
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup trial S0205.

Authors:  Philip A Philip; Jacqueline Benedetti; Christopher L Corless; Ralph Wong; Eileen M O'Reilly; Patrick J Flynn; Kendrith M Rowland; James N Atkins; Barry C Mirtsching; Saul E Rivkin; Alok A Khorana; Bryan Goldman; Cecilia M Fenoglio-Preiser; James L Abbruzzese; Charles D Blanke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Impact of chemoradiotherapy after disease control with chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma in GERCOR phase II and III studies.

Authors:  Florence Huguet; Thierry André; Pascal Hammel; Pascal Artru; Jacques Balosso; Frédéric Selle; Elisabeth Deniaud-Alexandre; Philippe Ruszniewski; Emmanuel Touboul; Roberto Labianca; Aimery de Gramont; Christophe Louvet
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Reporting results of cancer treatment.

Authors:  A B Miller; B Hoogstraten; M Staquet; A Winkler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Preoperative chemoradiation and pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  D B Evans; T A Rich; D R Byrd; K R Cleary; J H Connelly; B Levin; C Charnsangavej; C J Fenoglio; F C Ames
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-11

7.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  David Cunningham; Yves Humblet; Salvatore Siena; David Khayat; Harry Bleiberg; Armando Santoro; Danny Bets; Matthias Mueser; Andreas Harstrick; Chris Verslype; Ian Chau; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Epidermal growth factor receptor and tumor response to radiation: in vivo preclinical studies.

Authors:  Luka Milas; Zhen Fan; Nicolaus H Andratschke; K Kian Ang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study.

Authors:  B Chauffert; F Mornex; F Bonnetain; P Rougier; C Mariette; O Bouché; J F Bosset; T Aparicio; L Mineur; A Azzedine; P Hammel; J Butel; N Stremsdoerfer; P Maingon; L Bedenne
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Induction chemotherapy selects patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer for optimal benefit from consolidative chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Sunil Krishnan; Vishal Rana; Nora A Janjan; Gauri R Varadhachary; James L Abbruzzese; Prajnan Das; Marc E Delclos; Morris S Gould; Douglas B Evans; Robert A Wolff; Christopher H Crane
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  105 in total

1.  Amphiregulin Confers Regulatory T Cell Suppressive Function and Tumor Invasion via the EGFR/GSK-3β/Foxp3 Axis.

Authors:  Sihua Wang; Yuan Zhang; Yan Wang; Ping Ye; Jun Li; Huabin Li; Qingqing Ding; Jiahong Xia
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  [Strategies for preoperative downsizing in patients with local nonresectable pancreatic cancer].

Authors:  S E Combs; D Habermehl; J Werner; M W Büchler; J Debus
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  New possibilities and potential benefits for local control in locally recurrent pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Shane Lloyd; Bryan W Chang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-12

4.  Intensifying local radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer-who benefits and how do we select them?

Authors:  Sunil Krishnan; Mediha Ahmad
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-12

5.  The controversial role of chemoradiation for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jason E Faris; Jennifer Y Wo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-09-10

6.  Tumor-Derived CCL2 Mediates Resistance to Radiotherapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Anusha Kalbasi; Chad Komar; Graham M Tooker; Mingen Liu; Jae W Lee; Whitney L Gladney; Edgar Ben-Josef; Gregory L Beatty
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Advances in chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Bhawna Sirohi; Ashish Singh; Shaheenah Dawood; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-13

8.  Phase II Trial of Cetuximab and Conformal Radiotherapy Only in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer with Concurrent Tissue Sampling Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Agata I Rembielak; Pooja Jain; Andrew S Jackson; Melanie M Green; Gillian R Santorelli; Gillian A Whitfield; Adrian Crellin; Angel Garcia-Alonso; Ganesh Radhakrishna; James Cullen; M Ben Taylor; Ric Swindell; Catharine M West; Juan Valle; Azeem Saleem; Patricia M Price
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Identifying Clinical Factors Which Predict for Early Failure Patterns Following Resection for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in Patients Who Received Adjuvant Chemotherapy Without Chemoradiation.

Authors:  Steve Walston; Joseph Salloum; Carmine Grieco; Evan Wuthrick; Dayssy A Diaz; Christian Barney; Andrei Manilchuk; Carl Schmidt; Mary Dillhoff; Timothy M Pawlik; Terence M Williams
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 10.  Solutions that enable ablative radiotherapy for large liver tumors: Fractionated dose painting, simultaneous integrated protection, motion management, and computed tomography image guidance.

Authors:  Christopher H Crane; Eugene J Koay
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.