Literature DB >> 15908661

Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial.

C Louvet1, R Labianca, P Hammel, G Lledo, M G Zampino, T André, A Zaniboni, M Ducreux, E Aitini, J Taïeb, R Faroux, C Lepere, A de Gramont.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine (Gem) is the standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Given the promising phase II results obtained with the Gem-oxaliplatin (GemOx) combination, we conducted a phase III study comparing GemOx with Gem alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were stratified according to center, performance status, and type of disease (locally advanced v metastatic) and randomly assigned to either GemOx (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a 100-minute infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks) or Gem (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a weekly 30-minute infusion).
RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled; 313 were eligible, and 157 and 156 were allocated to the GemOx and Gem arms, respectively. GemOx was superior to Gem in terms of response rate (26.8% v 17.3%, respectively; P = .04), progression-free survival (5.8 v 3.7 months, respectively; P = .04), and clinical benefit (38.2% v 26.9%, respectively; P = .03). Median overall survival (OS) for GemOx and Gem was 9.0 and 7.1 months, respectively (P = .13). GemOx was well tolerated overall, although a higher incidence of National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 and 4 toxicity per patient was observed for platelets (14.0% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), vomiting (8.9% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), and neurosensory symptoms (19.1% for GemOx v 0% for Gem).
CONCLUSION: These results confirm the efficacy and safety of GemOx, but this study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant advantage in terms of OS compared with Gem. Because GemOx is the first combined treatment to be superior to Gem alone in terms of clinical benefit, this promising regimen deserves further development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15908661     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  305 in total

1.  Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Complete Histological Response After Palliative Therapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin.

Authors:  A Alexander; A Rehders; R Riediger; M Schmitt; M Anlauf; W T Knoefel
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-09

2.  Second-line therapy for gemcitabine-pretreated advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Romain Altwegg; Marc Ychou; Vanessa Guillaumon; Simon Thezenas; Pierre Senesse; Nicolas Flori; Thibault Mazard; Ludovic Caillo; Stéphanie Faure; Emmanuelle Samalin; Eric Assenat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Developments in metastatic pancreatic cancer: is gemcitabine still the standard?

Authors:  Jie-Er Ying; Li-Ming Zhu; Bi-Xia Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Extended pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Terence C Chua; Akshat Saxena
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  The role of radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Ruchika Gutt; Stanley L Liauw; Ralph R Weichselbaum
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret A Tempero; J Pablo Arnoletti; Stephen Behrman; Edgar Ben-Josef; Al B Benson; Jordan D Berlin; John L Cameron; Ephraim S Casper; Steven J Cohen; Michelle Duff; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; William G Hawkins; John P Hoffman; Boris W Kuvshinoff; Mokenge P Malafa; Peter Muscarella; Eric K Nakakura; Aaron R Sasson; Sarah P Thayer; Douglas S Tyler; Robert S Warren; Samuel Whiting; Christopher Willett; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  Elevated baseline CA19-9 levels correlate with adverse prognosis in patients with early- or advanced-stage pancreas cancer.

Authors:  Ludmila Katherine Martin; Lai Wei; Elizabeth Trolli; Tanios Bekaii-Saab
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  Preclinical Rationale for the Phase III Trials in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Is Wishful Thinking Clouding Successful Drug Development for Pancreatic Cancer?

Authors:  Ramya Thota; Anirban Maitra; Jordan D Berlin
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma With the Introduction of New Chemotherapeutic Drugs: 10-Year Experience of a Single NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Kevin J Zhang; Greg Dyson; Joshua L Gatz; Michael E Silverman; Anteneh A Tesfaye; Anthony F Shields; Philip A Philip
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.339

10.  Combination treatment with TRA-8 anti death receptor 5 antibody and CPT-11 induces tumor regression in an orthotopic model of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Leo Christopher DeRosier; Donald J Buchsbaum; Patsy G Oliver; Zhi-Qiang Huang; Jeffrey C Sellers; William E Grizzle; Wenquan Wang; Tong Zhou; Kurt R Zinn; Joshua W Long; Selwyn M Vickers
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.